A profile of North American wildlife agencies’ viewing programs

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 27-41

  Pierce, Cynthia L ^a   Manfredo, Michael J ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

Author keywords

North American wildlife agencies; Viewing programs; Watchable wildlife; Wildlife viewing

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023826207     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871209709359100     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Applegate, J. E. (1984). Nongame tax check-off programs: A survey of New Jersey residents following the first year of contributions. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 12(2), 122-128.
2. Arrandale, T. (1990). Can game departments cash in on that warm and fuzzy feeling? Governing, 3(10), 48-52.
3. Bayless, D. S., Bergstrom, J. C., Messonnier, M. L., & Cordell, H. K. (1994). Assessing the demand for designated wildlife viewing sites. Journal of Hospitality and Leisure Marketing, 2(3), 75-93.
4. Berger, M. E. (1994). Perspectives of traditional constituents on changing resource management agencies. Transactions of the North American and Natural Resources Conference, 49, 508-511.
5. Boggis, C. J., & Hamilton, M.S. (1984). Budgeting wildlife checkoff funds: Twenty states’ priorities, problems and prospects. Transactions of the 49b North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp. 222-232. Washington, D.C.: Wildlife Management.
6. Boxall, P. C., & McFarlane, B. L. (1993). Human dimensions of Christmas bird counts: Implications for nonconsumptive wildlife recreation programs. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21(4), 390-396.
7. Bullis, C. A., & Kennedy, J. J. (1991). Value conflicts and policy interpretation: Changes in the case of fisheries and wildlife managers in multiple use agencies. Policy Studies Journal, 19 (3-4), 542-552.
8. Carothers, K., & Knight, K. B. (1984). A profile of contributors to the West Virginia nongame wildlife program. Transactions of the 49h North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp. 190-198. Washington, D.C.: Wildlife Management.
9. Duda, M. D., & Young, K. C. (1994). Americans and diversity: Public opinion, attitudes, interest and participation in wildlife viewing and wildlife diversity programs. Harrisonburg, VA: Responsive Management.
10. Duffus, D. A., & Dearden, P. (1990). Nonconsumptive wildlife-oriented recreation: A conceptual framework. Biological Conservation, 53, 213-231.
11. Federal Reserve Database. Foreign Exchange Rates [On-line], Available at: http://www.stls.frb.org/fred/data/exhange/excaus.
12. Filion, F. L., DuWors, E., Boxall, P., Bouchard, P., Reid, R., Gray, P. A., Bath, A., Jacquemot, A., Legare, G. (1993). The importance of wildlife to Canadians: Highlights of the 1991 survey. Ottawa, Canada: Canadian Wildlife Service.
13. Gill, R. B. (1996). The wildlife professional subculture: The case of the crazy aunt. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2(1), 60-69.
14. Hammitt, W. E., Dulin, J. N., Wells, G. R. (1993). Determinants of quality wildlife viewing in Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21(1), 21-30.
15. Harris, C. C., Jr., Miller, T. A., Reese, K. (1992). Possible influences on donation behavior: The case of Idaho’s nongame wildlife and endangered species tax checkoff fund. Society and Natural Resources, 5, 53-66.
16. Henderson, C. L. (1984). Publicity strategies and techniques for Minnesota’s nongame wildlife checkoff. Transactions of the 49h North American Wildlife and Natural Resources Conference, pp. 181-189. Washington, D.C.: Wildlife Management Institute.
17. HLA Consultants, GAIA Consultants, & Cottonwood Consultants. (1990). Marketing watchable wildlife tourism in Alberta (Markets/opportunities/marketing). Alberta, Canada: Alberta Tourism and Alberta Forestry, Lands, & Wildlife.
18. Kellert, S. R. (1985). Birdwatching in American society. Leisure Sciences, 7(3), 343-360.
19. Lyons, J. R. (1982). Nonconsumptive wildlife-associated recreation in the U.S.: Identifying the other constituency. Transactions of the North American Wildlife and Natural Resource Conference, 47, 677-685.
20. Magill, A. W. (1988). Natural resource professionals: The reluctant public servants. The Environmental Professional, 10, 295-303.
21. Manfredo, M. J. (1988). Second-year analysis of donors to Oregon’s nongame tax checkoff. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 16(2), 221-224.
22. Manfredo, M. J., & Haight, B. (1986). Oregon’s nongame tax checkoff: A comparison of donors and nondonors. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 14(2), 121-126.
23. Manfredo, M. J., & Larson, R. A. (1993). Managing for wildlife viewing recreation experiences: An application in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 21(3), 226-236.
24. Missouri Department of Conservation. (1992, July). Missourians’ interests in fish, forest, and wildlife: Results of a statewide citizen survey 1989-1990. (Public Profile 3-92) Missouri Department of Conservation, Planning Division.
25. Richie, D. (1995). Changing the face of watchable wildlife. Nature Network, 2(1), 1, 3.
26. Twight, B. W., & Lyden, F. J. (1989). Measuring Forest Service bias. Journal of Forestry, 87(5), 35-41
27. U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service. (1977). 1975 National survey of hunting, fishing, and wildlife-associated recreation. Washington, D.C.
28. U. S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service & U. S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. (1993). 1990 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Government Printing Office.
29. U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. (1997). 1995 National survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation. Manuscript in preparation.