Defending Dramatism as ontological and literal

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 323-342

  Crable, Bryan ^a  

^a VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dramatism; Epistemology; K. Burke; Literality; Metaphor; Ontology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023687851     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370009385602     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bentz, Valeria Malhotra, and Kenny, Wade. 1997. “'Body‐as‐World’: Kenneth Burke's Answer to the Postmodernist Charges Against Sociology.”. Sociological Theory, 15: 81-96.
2. Brock, Bernard L., 1985. “Epistemology and Ontology in Kenneth Burke's Dramatism.”. Communication Quarterly, 33: 94-104.
3. Brock, Bernard L., 1993. “The Evolution of Kenneth Burke's Philosophy of Rhetoric: Dialectic Between Epistemology and Ontology.”. In Extensions of the Burkeian System, Edited by: Chesebro, James W., 309-328. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P.
4. Brock, Bernard L., Burke, Kenneth, Burgess, Parke G., and Simons, Herbert W., 1985. “Dramatism as Ontology or Epistemology: A Symposium.”. Communication Quarterly, 33: 17-33.
5. Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Attitudes Toward History., 3rd ed., Berkeley: U of California P.
6. Burke, Kenneth. 1967. “Dramatism.”. In Communication: Concepts and Perspectives, Edited by: Thayer, Lee. 327-360. Washington, DC: Spartan.
7. Burke, Kenneth. 1968. “Dramatism.”. In International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Edited by: Sills, David L., Vol. VII, 445-452. New York: The Macmillan Company and Free Press.
8. Burke, Kenneth. 1985. “Dramatism and Logology.”. Communication Quarterly, 33: 89-93.
9. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives., Berkeley: U of California P.
10. Burke, Kenneth. 1969. Language as Symbolic Action., Berkeley: U of California P.
11. Burke, Kenneth. 1955. “Linguistic Approach to Problems of Education.”. In Modern Philosophies and Education, Edited by: Henry, Nelson B., 259-303. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
12. Burke, Kenneth. 1984. Permanence and Change: An Anatomy of Purpose., 3rd ed., Berkeley: U of California P.
13. Burke, Kenneth. 1973. The Philosophy of Literary Form., 3rd ed., Berkeley: U of California P.
14. Burke, Kenneth. 1978. “Questions and Answers about the Pentad.”. College Composition and Communication, 19: 330-335.
15. Burke, Kenneth. 1970. The Rhetoric of Religion: Studies in Logology., Berkeley: U of California P.
16. Burke, Kenneth. 1978. “Rhetoric, Poetics, and Philosophy.”. In Rhetoric, Philosophy, and Literature: An Exploration, Edited by: Burks, Don M., 5-33. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue UP.
17. Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”, New York: Routledge.
18. Chesebro, James W., 1988. “Epistemology and Ontology as Dialectical Modes in the Writings of Kenneth Burke.”. Communication Quarterly, 36: 175-191.
19. Crable, Bryan. 2000. “Burke's Perspective on Perspectives: Grounding Dramatism in the Representative Anecdote.”. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 86: 318-333.
20. Deleuze, Gilles, and Parnet, Claire. 1987. Dialogues., Edited by: Tomlinson, Hugh, and Habberjam, Barbara. New York: Columbia UP.
21. Derrida, Jacques. 1982. Margins of Philosophy., Edited by: Bass, Alan. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
22. Dewey, John. 1988. The Quest for Certainty. Vol. 4 of The Later Works, 1925-1953., Edited by: Boydston, JoAnn. Vol. 4, Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
23. Fisher, Walter R., and Brockriede, Wayne. 1984. “Kenneth Burke's Realism.”. Central States Speech Journal, 35: 35-42.
24. Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language., Edited by: Smith, A. M. Sheridan. New York: Barnes & Noble Books.
25. Hyde, Michael J, and Smith, Craig R., 1979. “Hermeneutics and Rhetoric: A Seen but Unobserved Relationship.”. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 65: 347-363.
26. Kenny, Robert Wade. 2000. “The Constitutional Dialectic.”. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 86: 455-464.
27. Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By., U of Chicago P.
28. McKerrow, Raymie E., 1989. “Critical Rhetoric: Theory and Praxis.”. Communication Monographs, 56: 91-111.
29. Murray, Jeffrey W., 1998. “Kenneth Burke's Dramatistic Existentialism: Symbolic Action or Symbolic Becoming.”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association. 1998, New York, NY.
30. Nelson, John S., Megill, Allan, and McCloskey, Donald N., eds. 1991. The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affairs., Madison: U of Wisconsin P.
31. Ono, Kent A., and Sloop, John M., 1992. “Commitment to Telos—A Sustained Critical Rhetoric.”. Communication Monographs, 59: 48-60.
32. Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature., Princeton: Princeton UP.
33. Schrag, Calvin O., 1986. Communicative Praxis and the Space of Subjectivity., Bloomington: Indiana UP.
34. Schrag, Calvin O., 1997. The Self After Postmodernity., New Haven: Yale UP.
35. Scott, Robert L., 1967. “On Viewing Rhetoric as Epistemic.”. Central States Speech Journal, 18: 9-17.
36. Smith, Craig R., 1972. “The Coming of a Transcendent Rhetoric.”. Today's Speech, 20: 19-24.
37. Smith, Craig R., 1972. “The Medieval Subjugation and the Existential Elevation of Rhetoric.”. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 5: 159-174.
38. Southwell, Samuel B., 1987. Kenneth Burke and Martin Heidegger, With a Note Against Deconstruction., Gainsville: U of Florida P.
39. Stewart, John. 1994. “Structural Implications of the Symbol Model for Communication Theory: Language as Constitutive Articulate Contact.”. In Uses of ‘STRUCTURE’ in Communication Studies, Edited by: Conville, Richard L., 125-153. Westport, CT: Praeger.
40. Weimer, Walter B., 1984. “Why All Knowing is Rhetorical.”. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 20: 63-71.