An underspecified segmented discourse representation theory (USDRT)

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2, Issue , 1998, Pages 1188-1192

  Schilder, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAMBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCOURSE REPRESENTATION THEORY;

EID: 85023081298     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. N. Asher and M. Morreau. 1991. What some generic sentences mean. In Hans Kamp, editor, Default Logics for Linguistic Analysis, number R.2.5.B in DYANA Deliverable, pages 5-32. Centre for Cognitive Science, Edinburgh, Scotland.
2. Nicholas Asher. 1996. Mathematical treatments of discourse contexts. In Paul Dekker and Martin Stokhof, editors, Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium, pages 21-40. ILLC/Department of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.
3. Laura Kallmeyer. 1996. Underspecification in Tree Description Grammars. Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340 81, University of Tubingen, Tubingen, December.
4. Hans Kamp and Uwe Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, volume 42 of Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
5. th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin.
6. Frank Schilder. 1997. Temporal Relations in English and German Narrative Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh, Centre for Cognitive Science.
7. K. Vijay-Shanker. 1992. Using descriptions of trees in a tree adjoining grammar. Computational Linguistics, 18(4):481-517.
8. Bonnie L. Webber. 1991. Structure and ostension in the interpretation of discourse deixis. Language and Cognitive Processes, 6(2): 107-135.