Where Next in Victorian Literary Studies? – Revising the Canon, Extending Cultural Boundaries, and the Challenge of Interdisciplinarity

Literature Compass

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 1280-1291

  Shattock, Joanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023072725     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17414113     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2007.00468.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Anderson, Amanda. ‘Victorian Studies and the Two Modernities’. Victorian Studies 47.2 (Winter 2005): 195–203.
2. Flint, Kate. ‘Why Victorian: Response’. Victorian Studies 47.2 (Winter 2005): 230–9.
3. Hewitt, Martin. ‘Victorian Studies: Problems and Prospects?’. Journal of Victorian Culture 6.1 (Spring 2001): 137–61.
4. Hewitt, Martin. ‘Why the Notion of Victorian Studies Does Make Sense’. Victorian Studies 48.3 (Spring 2006): 395–438.
5. Marcus, Sharon. ‘Same Difference? Transnationalism, Comparative Literature and Victorian Studies’. Victorian Studies 45.4 (Summer 2003): 677–86.
6. Victorian Literature and Culture 27 (1999). See introduction by Carolyn Williams, 355–63; contributions by Regenia Gagnier, 465–72; John Kucich, 477–80; Linda Shires, 481–6; Isobel Armstrong, 513–6.
7. Victorian Poetry 41 (Winter 2003); 42 (Spring 2004).
8. ‘Victorian Studies 1957–87: An Editorial Birthday Party’. Victorian Studies 31 (1987–8): 79–102.