The Victorian experience of administering donor birth registers

International Congress Series

Volumn 1271, Issue C, 2004, Pages 357-360

  Szoke, Helen ^a  

^a Infertility Treatment Authority   (Australia)

Author keywords

Donor treatment; Donors; Legal; Offspring; Recruitment of donors; Regulation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85023024901     PISSN: 05315131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2004.05.021     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. John McBain v The State of Victoria & Ors. John Mc Bain v State of Victoria, Minister for Health of the State of Victoria, Infertility Treatment Authority and Lisa Meldrum. J. Sundberg. V 673 of 1999, McBain v State of Victoria [2000] FCA 1009. The effect of this case was that the Infertility Treatment Authority could no longer impose a ‘marriage requirement’ on women seeking treatment, 2000.
2. Blood, J., Unpublished Study, 2003, Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne.
3. Rumball, A., Telling the story: parents' scripts for donor offspring. Human Reproduction 14:5 (1999), 1392–1399.
4. Rumball, A., The Experience of Parents telling their children about their conception., FSA XV Annual Scientific Meeting, Queenstown, New Zealand, 1996.
5. Garrett, D., Donor insemination: effects on parents. Medical Journal of Australia 163 (1995), 248–250.
6. Purdie, A., et al. Attitudes of parents of young children to sperm donation—implications for donor recruitment. Human Reproduction 9:7 (1994), 1355–1358.
7. Daniels, K., Attitudes to donor insemination and invitro fertilisation: a community perspective. New Zealand Social Review 1 (1988), 4–10.
8. Rowland, R., The social and psychological consequences of secrecy in artificial insemination by donor programmes. Social Science & Medicine 21 (1985), 391–396.
9. Durna, E., et al. AID Offspring. Medical Journal of Australia 1 (1982), 338–339 Adair, V; Adair, V.