Appellate review of judicial fact-finding processes and decisions

Israel Law Review

Volumn 31, Issue 1-3, 1997, Pages 690-701

  Jung, Heike ^a  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85022350210     PISSN: 00212237     EISSN: 20479336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0021223700015442     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. For a comparison of both models cf. Goldstein, “Reflections on Two Models: Inquisitorial Schemes in American Criminal Procedure” (1974) 26 Stan. L.R. 1009;
2. Herrmann, “Various Models of Criminal Proceeedings”, (1978) South African J. of Criminal L. and Crimin. 3;
3. Nijboer, “Common Law Tradition in Evidence Scholarship Observed from a Continental Perspective”, (1993) 41 Am. J. Comp. L. 299;
4. Doran, Jackson and Seigel, “Rethinking Adversariness in Nonjury Criminal Trials”, (1995) 43 Am. J. Crim. L. 1, at 13.
5. Cf. BGHSt 14, 358 (365).
6. For a more detailed discussion of the origin and the scope of the principle cf. Meurer, “Beweiserhebung und Beweiswiirdigung”, in Gedachtnisschrift für Hilde Kaufmann (Berlin, 1986) 947;
7. Jerouschek, Wie frei ist die freie Beweiswiirdigung (Goltdammer's Archiv, 1992) 493.
8. Cf. my overview, “The Victim in the Criminal Justice System”, in Miyazawa and Ohya, eds., Victimology in Comparative Perspective (Tokyo, 1986) 349.
9. For a comparison e.g., Perron, ed., Die Beweisaufnahme im Strafverfahrensrecht des Auslands (Freiburg, 1995)
10. Spencer, “La preuve” in Delmas-Marty, ed., Procedures pénales d'Europe (Paris, 1995) 512.
11. P. Linell and L. Jonssen, “Suspect Stories: On Perspective Setting in an Asymmetrical Situation”. Paper presented at the Conference on Dialogical and Contextual Dominance (Bad Homburg, 23–25 Nov. 1989).
12. Cf. Jung, “Le ministere public: portrait d'une institution”, (1993) Archives de politique criminelle 15, at 24.
13. BGHSt 38, 372.
14. Luhmann, Legitimation durch Verfahren (Frankfurt a.M., 2nd ed., 1975) 114 s., 121.
15. Commission Justice Penale et Droits de l'homme, La mise en état des affaires pénales (Paris, 1991) 13.
16. Cf. Herrmann, “The Independence of the Judge in the Federal Republic of Germany”, in Contemporary Problems in Criminal Justice, (Tokyo, 1983) 75 s.
17. E.g., Twining, Rethinking Evidence (Oxford, 1990) as well as issue no. 23 (1996) of the French legal periodical Droit consecrated to “La Preuve”.