Two principles of end-user software engineering research

Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on End-User Software Engineering, WEUSE 2005

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages

  Segal, Judith ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Field studies; Professional end user developers; Software development practice

Indexed keywords

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

END USER DEVELOPMENT; END-USER DEVELOPERS; END-USER SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; FIELD STUDIES; IN-FIELD; PROFESSIONAL END-USER DEVELOPERS; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PRACTICES;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 85022142702     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1083231.1083240     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Beck, K. eXtreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison Wesley, 2000.
2. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P. The Social Life of Information. Harvard Business School Press, 2000.
3. Burnett, B., Cook, C., Rothermel, G. End user software engineering. Comm ACM, 47(9), 53-58, 2004.
4. Clements, P., Northrop, L. Software Products: Patterns and Practice. Addison Wesley, Reading Ma., 2001
5. Cockburn, A. Agile Software Development. Addison Wesley, 2002.
6. Fischer, G., Ostwald, J. Knowledge management: problems, promises, realities and challenges. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 16(1), 60-72, 2001.
7. Henninger, S. Organizational Learning in Dynamic Domains. In Advances in Learning Software Organizations. Althoff K-D, Feldmann R.L., Muller W (eds.). LNCS 2176, Springer-Verlag, pp 8-16, 2001
8. McBride, N., Wood-Harper, A.T. Towards user-oriented control of end user computing in large organizations. Journal of End user Computing, 14(1), 33-44, 2002
9. Morch, A.I., Stevens, G., Won, M., Klann, M., Dittrich, Y., Wulf, V. Component-based technologies for end user development. Comm ACM, 47(9), 59-62, 2004.
10. Morisio, M., Ezran, M., Tully, C. 2002. 'Success and failure factors in software reuse. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 28(4), 340-357
11. Nardi, B.A. A Small Matter of Programming: Perspectives on End User Computing. MIT Press, 1993.
12. Panko, R What we know about spreadsheet errors. Journal of End User Computing. 10(2), 15-21, 1998.
13. Robinson, H., Segal, J. and Sharp, H. The case for empirical studies of the practice of software development. Proceedings of the 2nd workshop in the Workshop Series on Empirical Studies in Empirical Software Engineering, Jedlitscha A and Ciolkowski M. (eds.), 99-108, 2003.
14. Seaman, C. Methods in empirical studies of software engineering IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 25(4), 557-572, 1999.
15. Segal, J. Organizational learning and software process improvement: a case study. Advances in Learning Software Orgnizations, LSO 2001. Springer-Verlag LNCS 2176, 68-82.
16. Segal, J. When software engineers met research scientists: a field study. Technical report 2003-14, Department of Computing, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK. http://computing-reports.open.ac.uk/index.php/2003/200314, 2003.
17. Segal, J. The nature of evidence in empirical software engineering. Proc. Intl. Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice (STEP 2003), IEEE Computer Society Press, 40-47, 2003.
18. Segal, J. Professional end user developers and software development knowledge. Technical report 2004-25, Department of Computing, Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK. http://computing-reports.open.ac.uk/index.php/2004/200425, 2004.
19. Sutcliffe, A. and Mehandjiev, N., End-User Development. CommACM, 47(9), 2004, 31-2
20. Taylor, M.P., Moyniham, E.P., Wood-Harper, A.T. End user computing and information systems methodologies. Information Systems Journal, 8, 85-96, 1998.