Designing for conversational interaction

Proceedings of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 207-212

  Johnston, Andrew ^a   Candy, Linda ^a   Edmonds, Ernest ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Instruments; Interaction; Music

Indexed keywords

CONVERSATIONAL INTERACTION; INTERACTION; INTERACTION FRAMEWORK; INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE; PARTIAL REFLECTION; PERFORMANCE; PHYSICAL MODELLING; SOFTWARE USE; SOUND SCULPTURES; VIRTUAL SOUND;

MUSIC;

EID: 85022068214     PISSN: 22204792     EISSN: 22204806     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Momeni and C. Henry, “Dynamic independent mapping layers for concurrent control of audio and video synthesis,” Computer Music Journal, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 49–66, 2006.
2. I. Choi, “A manifold interface for kinesthetic notation in high-dimensional systems,” in Trends in Gestural Control of Music (M. Wanderley and M. Battier, eds.), pp. 115–138, Paris: Ircam, 2000.
3. J. Rovan, M. Wanderley, S. Dubnov, and P. Depalle, “Instru-mental gestural mapping strategies as expressivity determinants in computer music performance,” in Proceedings of the AIMI International Workshop KANSEI-The Technology of Emotion, Genova, pp. 68–73, 1997.
4. A. Hunt, M. M. Wanderley, and R. Kirk, “Towards a model for instrumental mapping in expert musical interaction,” in Proc. International Computer Music Conference, 2000.
5. V. Krefeld and M. Waisvisz, “The hand in the web: An interview with Michel Waisvisz,” Computer Music Journal, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 28–33, 1990.
6. B. Bongers, Interactivation: Towards an e-cology of people, our technological environment, and the arts. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2006.
7. J. Chadabe, “The limitations of mapping as a structural descriptive in electronic instruments,” in NIME ’02: Proceedings of the 2002 conference on New interfaces for musical expression, (Singapore, Singapore), pp. 1–5, National University of Singapore, 2002.
8. P. Mogensen, “Towards a provotyping approach in systems development,” Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, vol. 4, pp. 31–53, 1992.
9. A. Johnston, B. Marks, and L. Candy, “Sound controlled musical instruments based on physical models,” in Proceedings of the 2007 International Computer Music Conference, pp. vol1: 232–239, 2007.
10. B. G. Glaser and A. L. Strauss, The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter, 1967.
11. B. G. Glaser, Theoretical Sensitivity. The Sociology Press, 1978.
12. A. Johnston, L. Candy, and E. Edmonds, “Designing and evaluating virtual musical instruments: facilitating conversational user interaction,” Design Studies, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 556–571, 2008.
13. R. Rowe, Interactive Music Systems. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1993.
14. T. Winkler, Composing Interactive Music: Techniques and Ideas Using Max. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1998.
15. M. S. Puckette, “Pure data,” in Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 224–227, 1997.
16. M. Danks, “The graphics environment for max,” in Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference, pp. 67–70, 1996.
17. M. S. Puckette, T. Apel, and D. D. Zicarelli, “Real-time audio analysis tools for pd and msp,” in International Computer Music Conference, (San Francisco), pp. 109–112, International Computer Music Association, 1998.
18. C. Roads, The Computer Music Tutorial. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 1996.