Using a pregnancy decision support program for women choosing birth after a previous caesarean in Japan: A mixed methods study

Women and Birth

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2018, Pages e9-e19

  Torigoe, Ikuyo ^a   Shorten, Allison ^b  

^a FUKUOKA PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; JAPAN; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMAN; PREMATURE FETUS MEMBRANE RUPTURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGRAM FEASIBILITY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SHARED DECISION MAKING; UTERUS RUPTURE; VAGINAL DELIVERY; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; PSYCHOLOGY; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT TECHNIQUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JAPAN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANT WOMEN; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 85022044151     PISSN: 18715192     EISSN: 18781799     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Kennare, R., Why is the caesarean section rate rising?. Midwifery Dig 13 (2003), 503–508.
2. Niino, Y., The increasing cesarean rate globally and what we can do about it. Biosci Trends 5 (2011), 139–150.
3. Mother's & Children's Health & Welfare Association, Boshi Hoken no Omonaru Toukei (Maternal and child health statistics of Japan). 2015, Mother's Children's Health Organization 2016. 127p. Japanese.
4. Menacker, F., Declercq, E., Macdorman, M.F., Cesarean delivery background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 30 (2006), 235–241.
5. Fenwick, J., Staff, L., Gamble, J., Creedy, D.K., Bayes, S., Why do women request caesarean section in a normal health first pregnancy?. Midwifery 26 (2010), 394–400.
6. Guise, J.M., Eden, K., Emeis, C., Denman, M.A., Marshall, N., Fu, R.R., et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. Evid Report/Technol Assess 191 (2010), 1–397.
7. Armstrong, C., Practice guideline ACOG updates recommendations on vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Am Fam Phys 83:2 (2010), 215–217.
8. Cunningham, F.G., Bangdiwala, S.I., Brown, S.S., Dean, T.M., Frederiksen, M., Rowland Hogue, C.J., et al. NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights. NIH Consens States Sci Statements 27:3 (2010), 1–42.
9. Roberts, R.G., Deutchman, M., King, V.J., Fryer, G.E., Miyoshi, T.J., Changing policies on vaginal birth after cesarean: impact on access. Birth 34:4 (2007), 316–322.
10. Foureur, M., Ryan, C.L., Nicholl, M., Homer, C., Inconsistent evidence: analysis of six national guidelines for vaginal birth after cesarean section. Birth 37:1 (2010), 3–10.
11. MacDorman, M., Declercq Menacker, F., Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States. Clin Perinatal 38 (2011), 179–192.
12. Minakami, H., Hiramatsu, Y., Koresawa, M., Fujii, T., Hamada, H., Iitsuka, Y., et al. Guidelines for obstetrical practice in Japan. J Obstet Gynecol Res 37:9 (2011), 1174–1197.
13. Torigoe, I., Shorten, B., Yoshida, S., Shorten, A., Trends in birth choices after caesarean section in Japan: a national survey examining information and access to vaginal birth after caesarean. Midwifery 37 (2016), 49–56.
14. Gamble, J., Creedy, D., Women's preference for a cesarean section: incidence and associated factors. Birth 28 (2001), 101–110.
15. Eden, B.K., Hashima, N.J., Osterweil, P., Nygren, P., Guise, J.M., Childbirth preference after cesarean birth: a review of the evidence. Birth 31 (2004), 49–60.
16. Shorten, A., Shorten, B., Kennedy, H.P., Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis. Birth 41 (2014), 178–184.
17. Shafir, A., Rosenthal, J., Shared decision-making: advancing patient centered care through state and federal implementation., 2012, National Academy for State Health Policy, Washington DC: Informed Medical Decisions Foundation Available from: http://www.nashp.org/sites/default/files/shared.decision.making.report.pdf.
18. Behruzi, R., Hatem, M., Fraser, W., Goulet, L., Ii, M., Misago, C., Facilitators and barriers in the humanization of childbirth practice in Japan. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 10, 2010, 25, 10.1186/1471-2393-10-25.
19. Shorten, A., Shorten, B., Keogh, J., West, S., Moris, J., Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean. Birth 32 (2005), 252–261.
20. Cox, K.J., Counseling women with a previous cesarean birth: toward a shared decision-making partnership. J Midwifery Womens Health 59:3 (2014), 237–245.
21. Shorten, A., Fagerlin, A., Illuzzi, J., Kennedy, H.P., Lakehomer, H., Pettker, C.M., et al. Developing an internet-based decision aid for women choosing between vaginal birth after cesarean and planned repeat cesarean. J Midwifery Womens Health 60:4 (2015), 390–400.
22. Stacey, D., Légaré, F., Col, N.F., Bennett, C.L., Barry, M.J., Eden, K.B., Holmes-Rovner, M., et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 28(1), 2014, 10.1002/14651858 CD001431. pub4.
23. Montgomery, A.A., Emmet, C.L., Fahey, T., Jones, C., Ricketts, I., Patel, R.R., et al. Two decision aids for mode of delivery among women with previous caesarean section: randomized controlled trial. Br Med J, 334, 2007, 1305, 10.1136/bmj.39217.671019.55 (Published 21 June 2007).
24. Farnworth, A., Robson, S.C., Thomson, R.G., Watson, D.B., Murtagh, M.J., Decision Support for women choosing mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: a developmental study. Patient Educ Counsel 71 (2008), 116–124.
25. Shorten, A., Birth choices. What is best for you. Vaginal or Caesarean Birth?. 2006, University of Wollongong Printery.
26. O'Connor, A.M., Tugwell, P., Wells, G.A., Elmslie, T., Jolly, E., Hollingworth, G., et al. A decision aid for women considering hormone therapy after menopause: decision support framework and evaluation. Patient Educ Counsel 33 (1998), 267–279.
27. O'Connor, A.M., Jacobsen, M.J., Stacey, D., An evidence-based approach to managing women's decisional conflict. J Obstet Gynecol Neonat Nurs 31 (2002), 570–581.
28. Saito, K., VBAC no shinri katei wo nozoku (Exploring psychological process of VBAC). Obstet Gynecol Pract 52:2 (2003), 207–212 Japanese.
29. Yoshida, R., Irie, A., Amano, K., Teiousekkai (cesarean section). Perinat Med 36:5 (2006), 639–642 Japanese.
30. Okuomi, T., Saikin no bunbenjimasui oyobi teiousekkaijimasui no doukou (recent trends regarding obstetrical anesthesia and anesthesia in caesarean section). Obstet Gynecol Pract 53:13 (2004), 1969–1978 Japanese.
31. Kimura, S., Sugimura, M., Kaneyama, N., Teiousekkaijutsu (caesarean section). Obstet Gynecol Pract 54:11 (2005), 1723–1734 Japanese.
32. Matsumoto, M., Murakami, T., Tojyo, Y., Nakayama, O., Narise, H., Torii, Y., Seireihamamtsu byouin ni okeru kiouteiousekkai syourei no shiken bunben (Trial of labor in cases of previous caesarean section in Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital). Med J Seirei Hamamatsu Gen Hosp 3:2 (2003), 8–11 Japanese.
33. Takemura, H., Satogaeri to VBAC (Returning to parents’ home to and VBAC). Obstet Gynecol Pract 52 (2003), 199–205 Japanese.
34. Watariba, T., Okamura, N., Nishio, Y., Kakizaki, K., Suehara, N., Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery syourei no rinshouteki kentou to sono kanri taisei (Clinical examination of VBAC case and the medical management system). J Kushiro City Gen Hosp 16:1 (2004), 47–50 Japanese.
35. Fujimori, N., Sato, A., Teiousekkai kiou keichitsubunben (VBAC)(Vaginal birth after cesarean). Obstet Gynecol 73 (2006), 49–55 Japanese.
36. Arimori, N., Randomized controlled trial of decision aids for women considering prenatal testing: the effect of the Ottawa Personal Decision Guide on decisional conflict. Jpn J Nurs Sci 3 (2006), 119–130.
37. Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., Analyzing qualitative data. Essentials of nursing research. methods, appraisal, and utilization, 6th ed., 2010, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA, 396–425.
38. Moffat, M.A., Bell, J.S., Porter, M.A., Lawton, S., Hundley, V., Danielian, P., et al. Decision making about mode of delivery among pregnant women who have previously had a caesarean section: a qualitative study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 114 (2006), 86–93.
39. Emmett, C.L., Shaw, A.R.G., Montgomery, A.A., Murphy, D.J., DiAMOND study group, Women's experience of decision making about mode of delivery after a previous caesarean section: the role of health professionals and information about health risks. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 113 (2006), 1438–1445.
40. Shorten, A., Shorten, B., Kennedy, H., Complexities of choice after prior cesarean: a narrative analysis. Birth 41 (2014), 178–184.
41. Frost, J., Shaw, A., Montgomery, A., Murphy, D.J., Women's views on the use of decision aids for decision making about the method of delivery following a previous caesarean section: qualitative interview study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 116 (2009), 896–905.
42. Saxell, L., Risk: theoretical or actual. Page, L.A., (eds.) The new midwifery: science and sensitivity in practice, 2000, Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 87–104.
43. Brooks, J., Risk and choices: a US midwifery perspective. Symon, A., (eds.) Risk and choice in maternity care. An international perspective, 2006, Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, 149–166.
44. Munro, S., Janssen, P., Corbett, K., Wilcox, W., Bansback, N., Kornelsen, J., Seeking control in the midst of uncertainty: Women's experience of choosing mode of birth after caesarean. Women Birth 30:2 (2017), 129–136, 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.10.005 [Epub ahead of print].
45. Eden, K.B., Perrin, N.A., Vesco, K.K., Guise, J.M., Randomized comparative trial of two decision tools for pregnant women with prior cesareans. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 43:September–October (5) (2014), 568–779, 10.1111/1552-6909.12485 Epub.