Preimplantation genetic screening: what is the clinical efficiency?

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 228-230

  Paulson, Richard J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

CRYOPRESERVATION; EDITORIAL; EMBRYO TRANSFER; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; LIVE BIRTH; MOSAICISM; NIDATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION EMBRYO; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTIFACTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85021888056     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.023     Document Type: Editorial

References (5)

1. Scott, R.T. Jr., Ferry, K., Su, J., Tao, X., Scott, K., Treff, N.R., Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril 97 (2012), 870–875.
2. Scott, R.T. Jr., Upham, K.M., Forman, E.J., Zhao, T., Treff, N.R., Cleavage-stage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril 100 (2013), 624–630.
3. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Final CSR for 2014. Available at: https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?reportingYear=2014. Accessed June 7, 2017.
4. Kang, H.-J., Melnick, A.P., Stewart, J.D., Xu, K., Rosenwaks, Z., Preimplantation genetic screening: who benefits?. Fertil Steril 106 (2016), 597–602.
5. Ata, B., Kaplan, B., Danzer, H., Glassner, M., Opsahl, M., Tan, S.L., et al. Array CGH analysis shows that aneuploidy is not related to the number of embryos generated. Reprod Biomed Online 24 (2012), 614–620.