Green to gray: Silicon Valley of India

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 206, Issue , 2018, Pages 1287-1295

  Bharath, H A ^a,b   Vinay, S ^b   Chandan, M C ^a   Gouri, B A ^b   Ramachandra, T V ^b  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

^b INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (India)

Author keywords

Bangalore; Image fusion; Land use; Tree cover

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; IMAGE FUSION; LAND USE; POPULATION STATISTICS; SILICON; VEGETATION;

BANGALORE; RAPID GROWTH; SILICON VALLEY; SPATIAL DATA; TREE COVER; URBAN AREAS; URBAN ECOLOGY; URBAN REGIONS; URBAN STRUCTURE; VEGETATION COVER;

URBAN GROWTH;

GPS; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LAND COVER; LAND USE; PERIURBAN AREA; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DATA; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN GROWTH; URBAN SPRAWL; VEGETATION COVER;

ARTICLE; ECOLOGY; INDIA; LANDSCAPE; NONHUMAN; TREE; TREE GROWTH; URBAN AREA; VEGETATION; CITY; ENVIRONMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; HUMAN;

BENGALURU; INDIA; KARNATAKA;

CITIES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; INDIA; TREES;

EID: 85021818032     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.072     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alparone, L., Wald, L., Chanussot, J., Thomas, C., Gamba, P., Bruce, L.M., Comparison of pansharpening algorithms: outcome of the 2006 GRS-S data-fusion contest. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 45:10 (2007), 3012–3021, 10.1109/tgrs.2007.904923.
2. Bharath, H.A., Ramachandra, T.V., Visualization of urban growth pattern in Chennai using geoinformatics and spatial metrics. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 44 (2016), 617–633, 10.1007/s12524-015-0482-0.
3. Bharath, H.A., Vinay, S., Ramachandra, T.V., Landscape dynamics modeling through integrated Markov, Fuzzy-AHP and cellular automata. 2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 2014, 3160–3163, 10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947148.
4. Bhuvan, virtual globe. Available at: http://bhuvan.nrsc.gov.in, (Accessed on 1 August 2017).
5. Brandtberg, T., Automatic individual tree based analysis of high spatial resolution aerial images on naturally regenerated boreal forests. Can. J. For. Res. 29 (1999), 1464–1478.
6. Chen, F., Guan, Z., Yang, X., Cui, W., A novel remote sensing image fusion method based on independent component analysis. Int. J. Remote Sens. 32:10 (2011), 2745–2763, 10.1080/01431161003743207.
7. Choi, M., A new intensity-hue-saturation fusion approach to image fusion with a tradeoff parameter. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 44 (2006), 1672–1682, 10.1109/TGRS.2006.869923.
8. Dong, Z., Wang, Z., Liu, D., Zhang, B., Zhao, P., Tang, X., Jia, M., SPOT5 multi-spectral (MS) and panchromatic (PAN) image fusion using an improved wavelet method based on local algorithm. Comput. Geosci. 60 (2013), 134–141, 10.1016/j.cageo.2013.07.002.
9. Duda, R.O., Hart, P.E., Stork, D.G., Pattern Classification. 2000, 10.1038/npp.2011.9 New York John Wiley, Sect.
10. Enquist, B.J., West, G.B., Brown, J.H., Extension and evaluations of a generalquantitative theory of forest structure and dynamics. PNAS 106:17 (2009), 7046–7051.
11. Gerland, P., Raftery, A.E., ev ikova, H., Li, N., Gu, D., Spoorenberg, T., Alkema, L., Fosdick, B.K., Chunn, J., Lalic, N., Bay, G., Buettner, T., Heilig, G.K., Wilmoth, J., World population stabilization unlikely this century. Science (80) 346 (2014), 234–237, 10.1126/science.1257469.
12. Gonzalez-Audicana, M., Saleta, J.L., Catalan, R.G., Garcia, R., Fusion of multispectral and panchromatic images using improved IHS and PCA mergers based on wavelet decomposition. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 42:6 (2004), 1291–1299, 10.1109/tgrs.2004.825593.
13. Google earth. A virtual Globe. www.earth.google.com, (Accessed on 4 March 2017).
14. Gougeon, F.A., Leckie, D.G., The individual tree crown approach applied to ikonos images of a coniferous plantation area. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 72:11 (2006), 1287–1297.
15. Government of India,. Census of India 2011, State of Literacy. 1991, 2001, 2011, 10.2105/AJPH.2010.193276.
16. Hirschmugl, M., Ofner, M., Raggam, J., Schardt, M., Single tree detection in very high resolution remote sensing data. Remote Sens. Environ 110 (2007), 533–544, 10.1016/j.rse.2007.02.029.
17. Karnataka State, Bangalore District Gazetteer. first ed., 1981, State publication, India.
18. Konijnendijk, C.C., A decade of urban forestry in Europe. For. Policy Econ. 5:2 (2003), 173–186, 10.1016/s1389-9341(03)00023-6.
19. Kumar, U., Mukhopadhyay, C., Ramachandra, T.V., Fusion of multisensor data: review and comparative analysis. Global Congress on Intelligent Systems, 2009, 418–422, 10.1109/GCIS.2009.457.
20. Kumar, U., Dasgupta, A., Mukhopadhyay, C., Ramachandra, T.V., Advanced machine learning algorithms based free and open source packages for landsat ETM+ data classification. OSGEO-India: FOSS4G, 2012.
21. Larsen, M., Finding an optimal match window for spruce top detection based on an optical tree model. Proc. Int. Forum Autom. Interpret. High Spat. Resolut. Digit. Imag. For., 1998, 55–66.
22. Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R.W., Chipman, J., Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation. seventh ed., 2015, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
23. McHale, M.R., Burke, I.C., Lefsky, M.A., Peper, P.J., McPherson, E.G., Urban forest biomass estimates: is it important to use allometric relationships developed specifically for urban trees?. Urban Ecosyst. 12:1 (2009), 95–113, 10.1007/s11252-009-0081-3.
24. Nikolakopoulos, K.G., Comparison of nine fusion techniques for very high resolution data. Photogramm. Eng. remote Sens. 74:5 (2008), 647–659, 10.14358/pers.74.5.647.
25. Padwick, C., Scientist, P., Deskevich, M., Pacifici, F., Smallwood, S., WorldView-2 pan-sharpening. Asprs 2010:48 (2010), 26–30.
26. Parker, G.G., Structure and microclimate of forest canopies. Lowman, M., Nadkarni, N., (eds.) Forest Canopies, 1995, Academic Press, California, USA, 73–106.
27. Petrović V.S., Xydeas, C.S., Gradient-based multiresolution image fusion. IEEE Trans. Image Process 13 (2004), 228–237, 10.1109/TIP.2004.823821.
28. Preto, G., Past and present of inventorying and monitoring systems. In Forest resource inventory and monitoring and remote sensing Technology. Proceedings of the IUFRO Centennial Meeting, Berlin, 1992, 1–10.
29. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H.A., Bengaluru's reality: towards unlivable status with unplanned urban trajectory. Curr. Sci., 110, 2016.
30. Ramachandra, T.V., Vishnu, B., Bharath, H.A., Bharath, S., Kumar, U., Exposition of urban structure and dynamics through gradient landscape metrics for sustainable management of greater Bangalore. FIIB Bus. Rev. 1 (2011), 17–34.
31. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H.A., Sanna, D.D., Insights to urban dynamics through landscape spatial pattern analysis. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 2012, 10.1016/j.jag.2012.03.005.
32. Ramachandra, T.V., Setturu, B., Bharath, H.A., Peri-urban to urban landscape patterns elucidation through spatial metrics. Int. J. Eng. Res. Dev., 2012, 58–81.
33. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, H.A., Vinay, S., Comprehension of temporal land use dynamics in urbanising landscape. Proceedings of User Interaction Meet-2013, Balanagar, Hyderabad, 2013, 21–22.
34. Ramachandra, T.V., Bharath, A.H., Sowmyashree, M.V., Monitoring urbanization and its implications in a mega city from space: spatiotemporal patterns and its indicators. J. Environ. Manage. 148 (2015), 67–81, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.015.
35. Sekhar, M., Kumar, M.M., Geo-hydrological Studies along the Metro Rail Alignment in Bangalore. Technical report, 2009, Indian Institute of Science, India http://bmrc.co.in/pdf/news/IISc-Report.pdf (Accessed on 4 August 2017).
36. Siddiqui, Y., The modified IHS method for fusing satellite imagery. ASPRS 2003 Annual Conference Proceedings. Anchorage, Alaska, 2003.
37. Sudhira, H.S., Ramachandra, T.V., Subrahmanya, M.H.B., Bangalore cities., 24(5), 2007, 379–390, 10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.003.
38. Vishwanath, B., Bharath, H.A., Ramachandra, T.V., Spatial patterns of urban growth with globalisation in India's Silicon Valley. OSGIS 2015, 2015, Indian Institute of Technology (BHU), Varanasi, India.
39. Walsworth, N.A., King, D.J., Image modelling of forest changes associated with acid mine drainage. Comput. Geosci. 25:5 (1999), 567–580, 10.1016/s0098-3004(98)00169-1.
40. Ward, K.T., Johnson, G.R., Geospatial methods provide timely and comprehensive urban forest information. Urban For. Urban Green. 6:1 (2007), 15–22, 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.11.002.
41. West, G.B., Enquist, B.J., Brown, J.H., Ageneral quantitative theory of foreststructure and dynamics. PNAS 106:17 (2009), 7040–7045.
42. Yakhdani, M.F., Azizi, A., Quality assessment of image fusion techniques for multisensor high resolution satellite images (Case study: IRS-P5 AND IRS-P6 satellite images). Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. - ISPRS Arch. 38 (2010), 204–209.