“Political co-authorships” in medical science journals

Clinical Anatomy

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 831-834

  Johal, Jaspreet ^a   Loukas, Marios ^a   Oskouian, Rod J ^b   Tubbs, R Shane ^a,b  

^a ST GEORGE S UNIVERSITY   (Grenada)

^b SEATTLE SCIENCE FOUNDATION   (United States)

Author keywords

authors; department; journals; medical education; promotions; seniority

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FRAUD; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; POLITICS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; ETHICS; HUMAN; STANDARDS; WRITING;

AUTHORSHIP; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; POLITICS; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 85021799198     PISSN: 08973806     EISSN: 10982353     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ca.22932     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bales ME, Dine DC, Merrill JA, Johnson SB, Bakken S, Weng C. 2014. Associating co-authorship patterns with publications in high-impact journals. J Biomed Inform 52:311–318.
2. Biglu MH, Abotalebi P, Ghavami M. 2016. Breast cancer publication network: Profile of co-authorship and co-organization. Bioimpacts 6:211–217.
3. Bozeman B, Youtie J. 2016. Trouble in paradise: Problems in academic research co-authoring. Sci Eng Ethics 22:1717–1743.
4. Conn VS, Ward S, Herrick L, Topp R, Alexander GL, Anderson CM, Smith CE, Benefield LE, Given B, Titler M, Larson JL, Fahrenwald NL, Cohen MZ, Georgesen S. 2015. Managing opportunities and challenges of co-authorship. West J Nurs Res 37:134–163.
5. Dance A. 2012. Authorship: Who's on first?. Nature 489:591–593.
6. Fonseca Bde P, Sampaio RB, Fonseca MV, Zicker F. 2016. Co-authorship network analysis in health network: Method and potential use. Health Res Policy Syst 14:34.
7. Guraya SY, Norman RI, Khoshhal KI, Guraya SS, Forgione A. 2016. Publish or perish mantra in the medical field: A systematic review of the reasons, consequences and remedies. Pak J Med Sci 32:1562–1567.
8. Hasan SS, Ahmadi K. 2017. Publish or perish: A mandate with negative collateral consequences. Acad Med 92:140.
9. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. 2004. ICMJE Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals. Haematologica 89:264.
10. Ioannidis JP. 2008. Measuring co-authorship and network-adjusted scientific impact. PLoS One 3:e2778.
11. Kakuk P. 2014. Beyond the IF boycott: Let's think about counter-incentives against illegitimate co-authorship. EMBO Rep 15:1104–1105.
12. Khor KA, Yu LG. 2016. Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities. Scientometrics 107:1095–1110.
13. Newman A, Jones R. 2006. Authorship of research papers: Ethical and professional issues for short-term researchers. J Med Ethics 32:420–423.
14. Nye MJ. 2014. Mine, thine, and ours: Collaboration and co-authorship in the material culture of the mid-twentieth century chemical laboratory. Ambix 61:211–235.
15. Scott T. 1997. Changing authorship system might be counterproductive. bmj 315:744.
16. Shaw D. 2014. The prisoners' dilemma. EMBO Rep 15:635–637.
17. Tol RS. 2011. Credit where credit's due: Accounting for co-authorship in citation counts. Scientometrics 89:291–299.