Vision for SLR tooling infrastructure: Prioritizing value-added requirements

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 91, Issue , 2017, Pages 72-81

  Al Zubidy, Ahmed ^a   Carver, Jeffrey C ^a   Hale, David P ^a   Hassler, Edgar E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA   (United States)

^b APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical software engineering; Systematic literature review; Tooling infrastructure

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EMPIRICAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; FEATURE ANALYSIS; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; SUPPORT TOOL; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW (SLR); TOOL REQUIREMENTS; TOOLING INFRASTRUCTURE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 85021798809     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2017.06.007     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Kitchenham, B., Charters, S., Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report EBSE-2007-01, 2007.
2. Kitchenham, B., Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Technical Report TR/SE-0401, 2004.
3. Kitchenham, B.A., Dyba, T., Jorgensen, M., Evidence-based software engineering. 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2004, IEEE Computer Society, 273–281.
4. Imtiaz, S., Bano, M., Ikram, N., Niazi, M., A tertiary study: experiences of conducting systematic literature reviews in software engineering. 17th International Conference on Evidence-Based Software Engineering on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering, 2013, ACM, 177–182.
5. Kitchenham, B., Brereton, P., A systematic review of systematic review process research in software engineering. Inf. Softw. Technol. 55:12 (2013), 2049–2075.
6. Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O.P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., Linkman, S., Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a tertiary study. Inf. Softw. Technol. 52:8 (2010), 792–805.
7. Da Silva, F., Santos, A., Soares, S., França, A., Monteiro, C., Maciel, F., Six years of systematic literature reviews in software engineering: an updated tertiary study. J. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53:9 (2011), 899–913.
8. Carver, J.C., Hassler, E., Hernandes, E., Kraft, N.A., Identifying barriers to the systematic literature review process. 7th International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013, IEEE, 203–212.
9. Hassler, E., Carver, J.C., Kraft, N.A., Hale, D., Outcomes of a community workshop to identify and rank barriers to the systematic literature review process. 18th International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering, 2014, ACM, 31.
10. Babar, M.A., Zhang, H., Systematic literature reviews in software engineering: preliminary results from interviews with researchers. 3rd International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2009, IEEE Computer Society, 346–355.
11. Riaz, M., Sulayman, M., Salleh, N., Mendes, E., Experiences conducting systematic reviews from novices' perspective. 14th International Conference on Evaluation & Assessment in Software Engineering, 2010.
12. Penzenstadler, B., Raturi, A., Richardson, D., Calero, C., Femmer, H., Franch, X., Systematic mapping study on software engineering for sustainability (se4s). Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2014, ACM, 14.
13. Ramampiaro, H., Cruzes, D., Conradi, R., Mendona, M., Supporting evidence-based software engineering with collaborative information retrieval. Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing (CollaborateCom), 2010 6th International Conference on, 2010, IEEE, 1–5.
14. Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B.A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Khalil, M., Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. J. Syst. Softw. 80:4 (2007), 571–583.
15. de Almeida Biolchini, J.C., Mian, P.G., Natali, A.C.C., Conte, T.U., Travassos, G.H., Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Adv. Eng. Inform. 21:2 (2007), 133–151.
16. Dieste, O., Padua, A.G., Developing search strategies for detecting relevant experiments for systematic reviews. First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM 2007), 2007, IEEE, 215–224.
17. Hassler, E., Carver, J.C., Hale, D., Al-Zubidy, A., Identification of SLR tool needs–results of a community workshop. J. Inf. Softw. Technol. 70 (2016), 122–129.
18. Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Tools to support systematic literature reviews in software engineering: a mapping study. 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, 2013, IEEE, 296–299.
19. Hernandes, E., Zamboni, A., Fabbri, S., Thommazo, A.D., Using gqm and tam to evaluate start-a tool that supports systematic review. CLEI Electron. J., 15(1), 2012 3–3.
20. Bowes, D., Hall, T., Beecham, S., Slurp: a tool to help large complex systematic literature reviews deliver valid and rigorous results. Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evidential Assessment of Software Technologies, 2012, ACM, 33–36.
21. Fernández-Sáez, A.M., Bocco, M.G., Romero, F.P., Slr-tool: a tool for performing systematic literature reviews. ICSOFT (2), 2010, 157–166.
22. Barn, B., Raimondi, F., Athiappan, L., Clark, T., Slrtool: a tool to support collaborative systematic literature reviews. 2014.
23. Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a feature analysis. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2014, ACM, 13.
24. Marshall, C., Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B., Tools to support systematic reviews in software engineering: a cross-domain survey using semi-structured interviews. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2015, ACM, 26.
25. Parsifal systematic literature review tool, ( https://parsif.al/) [Online; accessed 1-December-2016].
26. Molléri, J.S., Benitti, F.B.V., Sesra: a web-based automated tool to support the systematic literature review process. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2015, ACM, 24.
27. Fabbri, S., Silva, C., Hernandes, E., Octaviano, F., Di Thommazo, A., Belgamo, A., Improvements in the start tool to better support the systematic review process. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, 2016, ACM, 21.
28. Kitchenham, B.A., Evaluating software engineering methods and tools, part 7: planning feature analysis evaluation. ACM SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 22:4 (1997), 21–24.
29. Kitchenham, B., Linkman, S., Law, D., Desmet: a methodology for evaluating software engineering methods and tools. Comput. Control Eng. J. 8:3 (1997), 120–126.
30. Grimán, A., Pérez, M., Mendoza, L., Losavio, F., Feature analysis for architectural evaluation methods. J. Syst. Softw. 79:6 (2006), 871–888.
31. Hedberg, H., Lappalainen, J., A preliminary evaluation of software inspection tools, with the desmet method. Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC'05), 2005, IEEE, 45–52.