Examining Provisions Related to Consent in the Revised Common Rule

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 22-26

  Sugarman, Jeremy ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

consent; regulation; research ethics

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED STATES; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH SUBJECT;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FEDERAL GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85021756145     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1329483     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Corneli, A., E., Namey, M. P., Mueller, J., Tharaldson, S., Sortijas, T., Grey, and J., Sugarman. 2017. Evidence-based strategies for shortening informed consent forms in clinical research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12 (1):14–25.
2. Corneli, A., and J., Sugarman. 2017. Reducing consent form length:Stakeholder support, evidence-based strategies, and regulatory requirements. IRB:Ethics & Human Research 39 (2):18–20.
3. Dasgupta, I., J., Bollinger, D. J. H., Mathews, N., Neumann, A., Rattani, and J., Sugarman. 2014. Patients’ attitudes toward the donation of biological materials for the derivation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14:9–12.
4. Eder, M. L., A. D., Yamokoski, P. W., Wittmann, and E. D., Kodish. 2007. Improving informed consent:suggestions from parents of children with leukemia. Pediatrics 119 (4):e849–59.
5. Flory, J., and E., Emanuel. 2004. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research:A systematic review. Review. Journal of the American Medical Association 292 (13):1593–601.
6. IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2015. Informed consent and health literacy:Workshop summary. Washington, DC:National Academies Press. Available at:http://www.nationalacademies.org/hmd/Reports/2015/Informed-Consent-Health-Literacy.aspx
7. Kass, N., H., Taylor, L., Fogarty, J., Sugarman, S. N., Goodman, A., Goodwin-Landher, M., Carducci, and H., Hurwitz. 2008. Purpose and benefits of early phase cancer trials:What do oncologists say? What do patients hear? Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 3:57–68.
8. Lavori, P. W., J., Sugarman, M. T., Hays, and J. R., Feussner. 1999. Improving informed consent in clinical trials:A duty to experiment. Controlled Clinical Trials 20 (2):187–93.
9. McKinney, R. E., Jr., L. M., Beskow, D. E., Ford, et al. 2015. Use of altered informed consent in pragmatic clinical research. Clinical Trials 12:494–502.
10. Office of Human Research Protections. 2017. Federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Federal Register 82 (12):7149–7274.
11. Sugarman, J., D. C., McCrory, D., Powell, et al. 1999. Empirical research on informed consent. Hastings Center Report 29:S1–S42.
12. Taylor, H. A., J., Sugarman, D. S., Pisetsky, and J., Bathon. 2007. Formative research in clinical trial development:Attitudes of patients with arthritis in enhancing prevention trials. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 66 (4):542–4.
13. US Congress. H.R. 34–1114th Congress (2015–2016). 21st Century Cures Act. Title II, Subtitle C, Section 3023. Protection of Human Subjects. Available at:https://www.congress.gov/114/bills/hr34/BILLS-114hr34enr.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).
14. Zarin, D. A., T., Tse, R. J., Williams, and S., Carr. 2016. Trial reporting in clinicaltrials.gov—The final rule. New England Journal of Medicine 375 (20):1998–2004.