메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 12, Issue 12, 2014, Pages

Guidance on Statistical Reporting
[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

guidance; sampling; statistical reporting; statistics; study design

Indexed keywords


EID: 85021717583     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3908     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (23)

References (15)
  • 1
    • 85062010701 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments carried out by EFSA
    • Part 2 General Principles., 2009
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2009. Guidance of the Scientific Committee on Transparency in the Scientific Aspects of Risk Assessments carried out by EFSA. Part 2: General Principles. EFSA Journal 2009, 1051, 1–22.
    • (2009) EFSA Journal , vol.1051 , pp. 1-22
  • 2
    • 85078380150 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making
    • 2010;,)1637
    • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010. Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA Journal 2010;8(6):1637. 90 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1637.
    • (2010) EFSA Journal , vol.8 , Issue.6 , pp. 90
  • 3
    • 85078378684 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance on Expert Knowledge Elicitation in Food and Feed Safety Risk Assessment
    • 2014;,)3734
    • European Food Safety Authority, 2014. Guidance on Expert Knowledge Elicitation in Food and Feed Safety Risk Assessment. EFSA Journal 2014;12(6):3734, 278 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3734.
    • (2014) EFSA Journal , vol.12 , Issue.6 , pp. 278
  • 4
    • 85029364146 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidance on the Use of Probabilistic Methodology for Modelling Dietary Exposure to Pesticide Residues
    • 2012;,)2839
    • EFSA Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR), 2012. Guidance on the Use of Probabilistic Methodology for Modelling Dietary Exposure to Pesticide Residues. EFSA Journal 2012;10(10):2839, 95 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2839.
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.10 , pp. 95
  • 5
    • 85053203545 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistical Significance and Biological Relevance
    • 2011;,)2372
    • EFSA Scientific Committee (SC), 2011. Statistical Significance and Biological Relevance. EFSA Journal 2011;9(9):2372, 17 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2372.
    • (2011) EFSA Journal , vol.9 , Issue.9 , pp. 17
  • 6
    • 85026296547 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology
    • 2012;,)2664
    • EFSA Scientific Committee (SC), 2012. Scientific Opinion on Risk Assessment Terminology. EFSA Journal 2012;10(5):2664, 43 pp. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2664.
    • (2012) EFSA Journal , vol.10 , Issue.5 , pp. 43
  • 7
    • 84885996540 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Available online
    • Eurostat, 2007. Handbook on Data Quality Assessment Methods and Tools. Available online: epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/quality/documents/HANDBOOK%20ON%20DATA%20QUALITY%20ASSESSMENT%20METHODS%20AND%20TOOLS%20%20I.pdf.
    • (2007) Handbook on Data Quality Assessment Methods and Tools
  • 10
    • 84885036115 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: the SAMPL Guidelines
    • Smart P, Maisonneuve H, Polderman A, (Eds)., European Association of Science Editors
    • Lang TA and Altman DG, 2013. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in biomedical journals: the SAMPL Guidelines. In: Smart P, Maisonneuve H, Polderman A (Eds). Science Editors' Handbook, European Association of Science Editors.
    • (2013) Science Editors' Handbook
    • Lang, T.A.1    Altman, D.G.2
  • 11
    • 68049137869 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration
    • et al, volume, issue
    • Liberati et al 2009. The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration. PloS Medicine, volume 6, issue 7, e1000100.
    • (2009) PloS Medicine , vol.6 , Issue.7
  • 12
    • 7244238543 scopus 로고
    • ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Available online
    • ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use), 1995. Structure and Contents of Clinical Study Reports, E3. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Available online: www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E3/E3_Guideline.pdf.
    • (1995) Structure and Contents of Clinical Study Reports, E3
  • 13
    • 0003875319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Available online
    • ICH (International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use), 1998. Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials, E9. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Available online: www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E9/Step4/E9_Guideline.pdf.
    • (1998) Statistical Principles for Clinical Trials, E9
  • 14
    • 77953395873 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials
    • 2010
    • Schulz KF, Altman DG and Moher D, 2010. CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials. Annals Internal Medicine 2010;152:726–732.
    • (2010) Annals Internal Medicine , vol.152 , pp. 726-732
    • Schulz, K.F.1    Altman, D.G.2    Moher, D.3
  • 15
    • 84887408480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Available online
    • SDMX (Statistical Data and Metadata eXchange), 2009. SDMX Content-oriented Guidelines. Available online: sdmx.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/00_sdmx_content-oriented_guidelines_2009.pdf.
    • (2009) SDMX Content-oriented Guidelines


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.