Pulling out the stops: Rethinking stopword removal for topic models

15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, EACL 2017 - Proceedings of Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2017, Pages 432-436

  Schofield, Alexandra ^a   Magnusson, Mans ^b   Mimno, David ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MODEL INFERENCE; PULLING OUT; TOPIC MODEL;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85021648547     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.18653/v1/e17-2069     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (10)

1. Nikolaos Aletras and Mark Stevenson. 2013. Evaluating topic coherence using distributional semantics. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Semantics (IWCS 2013)-Long Papers, pages 13-22, Potsdam, Germany, March. Association for Computational Linguistics
2. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. N, and Michael I. Jordan. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3:993-1022, March
3. Jonathan Chang, Sean Gerrish, ChongWang, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber, and David M. Blei. 2009. Reading tea leaves: How humans interpret topic models. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, and A. Culotta, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22, pages 288-296. Curran Associates, Inc
4. Mark Dredze, Hanna M. Wallach, Danny Puller, and Fernando Pereira. 2008. Generating summary keywords for emails using topics. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '08, pages 199-206, New York, NY, USA. ACM
5. Jey Han Lau, David Newman, and Timothy Baldwin. 2014. Machine reading tea leaves: Automatically evaluating topic coherence and topic model quality. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 530-539, Gothenburg, Sweden, April. Association for Computational Linguistics
6. Andrew K. M. 2002. MALLET: A machine learning for language toolkit. Available at: http://mallet.cs.umass.edu
7. David Mimno, Hanna Wallach, Edmund Talley, Miriam Leenders, and Andrew McCallum. 2011. Optimizing semantic coherence in topic models. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 262-272, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK., July. Association for Computational Linguistics
8. Evan Sandhaus. 2008. The New York Times annotated corpus. Linguistic Data Consortium, DVD: LDC2009T19
9. Hanna M.Wallach, David M. Mimno, and Andrew Mc-Callum. 2009a. Rethinking LDA: Why priors matter. In Y. Bengio, D. Schuurmans, J. D. Lafferty, C. K. I. Williams, and A. Culotta, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 22, pages 1973-1981. Curran Associates, Inc
10. Hanna M. Wallach, Iain Murray, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, and David Mimno. 2009b. Evaluation methods for topic models. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '09, pages 1105-1112, New York, NY, USA. ACM