Improving the identification of phenotypic abnormalities and sexual dimorphism in mice when studying rare event categorical characteristics

Genetics

Volumn 205, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 491-501

  Karp, Natasha A ^a   Heller, Ruth ^b   Yaacoby, Shay ^b   White, Jacqueline K ^a   Benjamini, Yoav ^b  

^a WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Gene phenotype map; Mouse models; Multiple testing; Rare events; Sexual dimorphism

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BINOMIAL DISTRIBUTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS; GENETIC BACKGROUND; GENETIC SCREENING; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE PHENOTYPE CORRELATION; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PENETRANCE; PHENOTYPE; PHENOTYPIC VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEX DIFFERENCE; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; PROBABILITY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENOTYPE; MALE; MICE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PROBABILITY; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 85021448132     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.116.195388     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Aharoni, E., and R. Saharon, 2014 Generalized a‐investing: definitions, optimality results and application to public databases. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 76: 771-794.
2. Ahmed, I., C. Dalmasso, F. Haramburu, F. Thiessard, P. Broet et al., 2010 False discovery rate estimation for frequentist pharmacovigilance signal detection methods. Biometrics 66: 301-309.
3. Benjamini, Y., and M. Bogomolov, 2014 Selective inference on multiple families of hypotheses. J. R. Stat. Soc. Series B Stat. Methodol. 76: 297-318.
4. Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg, 1995 Controlling the false discovery rate-a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 57: 289-300.
5. Benjamini, Y., and D. Yekutieli, 2005 False discovery rate-adjusted multiple confidence intervals for selected parameters. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100: 71-81.
6. Bourgon, R., R. Gentleman, and W. Huber, 2010 Independent filtering increases detection power for high-throughput experiments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 9546-9551.
7. Brown, S. D., and M. W. Moore, 2012 Towards an encyclopaedia of mammalian gene function: the International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium. Dis. Model. Mech. 5: 289-292.
8. Flanagan, K. L., 2014 Sexual dimorphism in biomedical research: a call to analyse by sex. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 108: 385-387.
9. Gilbert, P. B., 2005 A modified false discovery rate multiplecomparisons procedure for discrete data, applied to human immunodeficiency virus genetics. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. C Appl. Stat. 54: 143-158.
10. Greenland, S., 1983 Tests for interaction in epidemiologic studies: a review and a study of power. Stat. Med. 2: 243-251.
11. Heinze, G., 2006 A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data. Stat. Med. 25: 4216-4226.
12. Heinze, G., and M. Schemper, 2002 A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression. Stat. Med. 21: 2409-2419.
13. Heyse, J., 2011 A false discovery rate procedure for categorical data, pp. 43-58 in Recent Advances in Biostatistics: False Discovery Rates, Survival Analysis, and Related Topics. World Scientific, New Jersey.
14. Hollander, M., D. Wolfe, and E. Chicken, 2014 Nonparametric Statistical Methods, Wiley, New Jersey.
15. Hwang, J. T. G., and M. C. Yang, 2001 An optimality theory for mid p-values in 2 x 2 contingency tables. Stat. Sin. 11: 807-826.
16. Javanmard, A., and A. Montanari, 2016 Online rules for control of false discovery rate and false discovery exceedance. arXiv. Available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.09000.
17. Karp, N. A., D. Melvin Sanger Mouse Genetics Project, and R. F. Mott, 2012 Robust and sensitive analysis of mouse knockout phenotypes. PLoS One 7: e52410.
18. Karst, S. Y., B. Chang, B. FitzMaurice, H. E. Fairfield, L. G. Reinholdt et al., 2014 A spontaneous mutation in mouse Myo10. MGI Direct Data Submission. Available at: http://www.informatics.jax.org/reference/J:214794. Accessed: June 2, 2016.
19. Kim, A. M., C. M. Tingen, and T. K. Woodruff, 2010 Sex bias in trials and treatment must end. Nature 465: 688-689.
20. Koscielny, G., G. Yaikhom, V. Iyer, T. F. Meehan, H. Morgan et al., 2013 The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium Web Portal, a unified point of access for knockout mice and related phenotyping data. Nucleic Acids Res. 42: D802-D809.
21. Kulinskaya, E., and A. Lewin, 2009 On fuzzy familywise error rate and false discovery rate procedures for discrete distributions. Biometrika 96: 201-211.
22. Kurbatova, N., J. C. Mason, H. Morgan, T. F. Meehan, and N. A. Karp, 2015 PhenStat: a tool kit for standardized analysis of high throughput phenotypic data. PLoS One 10: e0131274.
23. Lancaster, H., 1961 Significance tests in discrete distributions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 56: 223-234.
24. Newcombe, R. G., 1998 Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat. Med. 17: 873-890.
25. Ober, C., D. A. Loisel, and Y. Gilad, 2008 Sex-specific genetic architecture of human disease. Nat. Rev. Genet. 9: 911-922.
26. Prendergast, L. A., and R. G. Staudte, 2014 Better than you think: interval estimators of the difference of binomial proportions. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 148: 38-48.
27. Reiner, A., D. Yekutieli, and Y. Benjamini, 2003 Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures. Bioinformatics 19: 368-375.
28. Rothman, K., S. Greenland, and T. Lash, 1998 Modern Epidemiology, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Press, Philadephia, PA.
29. Tarone, R. E., 1990 A modified Bonferroni method for discretedata. Biometrics 46: 515-522.
30. White, J. K., A. K. Gerdin, N. A. Karp, E. Ryder, M. Buljan et al., 2013 Genome-wide generation and systematic phenotyping of knockout mice reveals new roles for many genes. Cell 154: 452-464.
31. Woodruff, T. K., 2014 Sex, equity, and science. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 5063-5064.
32. Yang, X., E. E. Schadt, S. Wang, H. Wang, A. P. Arnold et al., 2006 Tissue-specific expression and regulation of sexually dimorphic genes in mice. Genome Res. 16: 995-1004.
33. Zelen, M., 1971 The analysis of several 2×2 contingency tables. Biometrika 58: 129-137.