Utility of 1% Tropicamide in Improving the Quality of Images for Tele-Screening of Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients with Dark Irides

Ophthalmic Epidemiology

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 217-221

  Banaee, Touka ^a,b   Ansari Astaneh, Mohammad Reza ^a   Pourreza, Hamidreza ^c   Faal Hosseini, Fatemeh ^c   Vatanparast, Maryam ^c   Shoeibi, Nasser ^a,b   Jami, Vajihe ^c  

^a MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^b MASHHAD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

^c FERDOWSI UNIVERSITY OF MASHHAD   (Iran)

Author keywords

Diabetic retinopathy; fundus photography; mydriasis; non mydriatic fundus camera; tele ophthalmology; tele screening

Indexed keywords

TROPICAMIDE; EYE DROPS; MYDRIATIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETIC PATIENT; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; EYE FUNDUS; EYE PHOTOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FUNDUS CAMERA; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT REPEATABILITY; MYDRIASIS; OPTIC DISK; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; SCREENING; TELEMEDICINE; TELESCREENING; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; DOSE RESPONSE; FLUORESCENCE ANGIOGRAPHY; IRIS; MASS SCREENING; PATHOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; RETINA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TELEMETRY;

ADULT; DIABETIC RETINOPATHY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; FLUORESCEIN ANGIOGRAPHY; FUNDUS OCULI; HUMANS; IRIS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MYDRIATICS; OPHTHALMIC SOLUTIONS; PHOTOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETINA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TELEMETRY; TROPICAMIDE;

EID: 85021412068     PISSN: 09286586     EISSN: 17445086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09286586.2016.1274039     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Hatef E, Fotouhi A, Hashemi H, et al. Prevalence of retinal diseases and their pattern in Tehran:the Tehran Eye Study. Retina 2008;28:755–762.
2. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes:estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 2004;27:1047–1053.
3. Hartnett ME, Key IJ, Loyacano NM, et al. Perceived barriers to diabetic eye care:qualitative study of patients and physicians. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:387–391.
4. Marks JB., Nonmydriatic fundus photography in screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Complications 1992;6:247–253.
5. Patel KH, Javitt JC, Tielsch JM, Street DA, Katz J, Quigley HA, Sommer A., Incidence of acute angle-closure glaucoma after pharmacologic mydriasis. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;120(6):709–17.
6. Higgs ER, Harney BA, Kelleher A, et al. Detection of diabetic retinopathy in the community using a non-mydriatic camera. Diabetic Med 1991;6:551–555.
7. Ryder REJ, Vora JP, Atiea JA, et al. Possible new method to improve detection of diabetic retinopathy:polaroid non-mydriatic retinal photography. BMJ 1985;291:1256–1257.
8. Pandit R, Taylor R., Mydriasis and glaucoma:exploding the myth. A systematic review. Diabetic Med 2000;17:693–699.
9. Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, et al. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:1132–1137.
10. Korczyn AD, Laor N, Nemet P., Sympathetic papillary tone in old age. Arch Ophthalmol 1976; 94:1905–1906.
11. Jones R., Do women and myopes have larger pupils? Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1413–1415.
12. Bergamin O, Schoetzau A, Sugimoto K, et al. The influence of iris color on the pupillary light reflex. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1998;236:567–570
13. Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, et al. Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 1985;92:485–491.
14. Lamirel C, Bruce BB, Wright DW, et al. Quality of nonmydriatic digital fundus photography obtained by nurse practitioners in the emergency department:the FOTO-ED study. Ophthalmology 2012;119:617–624.
15. Gupta V, Bansal R, Gupta A, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital imaging in screening diabetic retinopathy in Indian eyes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2014;62:851–856.