Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search?

Health Information and Libraries Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 217-224

  Ross White, Amanda ^a   Godfrey, Christina ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

bibliographic databases; information storage and retrieval; library services; literature; review

Indexed keywords

EID: 85021357538     PISSN: 14711834     EISSN: 14711842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hir.12185     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
2. Joanna Briggs Institute. Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers' Manual: 2014 edition. Adelaide, Australia: The Joanna Briggs Institute; 2014. Available from: http://www.joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/sumari/ReviewersManual-2014.pdf.
3. Institute of Medicine; Board on Health Care Services; Committee on Standards for Systematic Reviews of Comparative Effectiveness Research; Eden, J., Levit, L., Berg, A. & Morton, S. (eds). Finding What Works in Health Care: Standards for Systematic Reviews. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine, 2011: 4.
4. Booth, A. The number needed to retrieve: A practically useful measure of information retrieval? Health Information & Libraries Journal 2006, 23, 229–232.
5. Booth, A. How much searching is enough? Comprehensive versus optimal retrieval for technology assessments. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2010, 26, 431–435.
6. Chilcott, J., Brennan, A., Booth, A., Karnon, J. & Tappenden, P. The role of modelling in prioritising and planning clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment 2003, 7, iii, 1–125.
7. Greenhalgh, T. & Peacock, R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: Audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005, 331, 1064–1065.
8. Toth, B., Gray, J. A. & Brice, A. The number needed to read-a new measure of journal value. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2005, 22, 81–82.
9. Golder, S. & Loke, Y. K. The contribution of different information sources for adverse effects data. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 2012, 28, 133–137.
10. Katchamart, W., Faulkner, A., Feldman, B., Tomlinson, G. & Bombardier, C. PubMed had a higher sensitivity than Ovid-MEDLINE in the search for systematic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011, 64, 805–807.
11. Godfrey, C. M., Harrison, M. B., Graham, I. D. & Ross-White, A. Utilisation of theoretical models and frameworks in the process of evidence synthesis. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 2010, 8, 730–751.
12. Goldstein, D. H., Phelan, R., Wilson, R., Ross-White, A., VanDenKerkhof, E. G., Penning, J. P. & Jaeger, M. Brief review: Adoption of electronic medical records to enhance acute pain management. Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2014, 61, 164–179.
13. McVeety, J., Keeping-Burke, L., Harrison, M. B., Godfrey, C. & Ross-White, A. Patient and family member perspectives of encountering adverse events in health care: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 2014, 12, 315–373.
14. Sears, K., Ross-White, A. & Godfrey, C. M. The incidence, prevalence and contributing factors associated with the occurrence of medication errors for children and adults in the community setting: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 2012, 10, 2350–2464.
15. VanDenKerkhof, E. G., Carley, M. E., Hopman, W. M., Ross-White, A. & Harrison, M. B. Prevalence of chronic pain and related risk factors in military veterans: A systematic review. JBI Library of Systematic Reviews 2014, 12, 152–186.
16. Vandyk, A. D., Harrison, M. B., Macartney, G., Ross-White, A. & Stacey, D. Emergency department visits for symptoms experienced by oncology patients: A systematic review. Supportive Care in Cancer 2012, 20, 1589–1599.
17. Vandyk, A. D., Harrison, M. B., VanDenKerkhof, E. G., Graham, I. D. & Ross-White, A. Frequent emergency department use by individuals seeking mental health care: A systematic search and review. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing 2013, 27, 171–178.
18. Chaparro, L. E., Wiffen, P. J., Moore, R. A. & Gilron, I. Combination pharmacotherapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Systematic Review 2012, 7, 1–59, CD008943.
19. Sampson, M., McGowan, J., Lefebvre, C., Moher, D. & Grimshaw, J. PRESS: Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, 2008.
20. Sampson, M. & McGowan, J. Inquisitio validus Index Medicus: A simple method of validating MEDLINE systematic review searches. Research Synthesis Methods 2011, 2, 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.40.
21. Watt, A., Cameron, A., Sturm, L., Lathlean, T., Babidge, W., Blamey, S., Facey, K., Hailey, D., Norderhaug, I. & Maddern, G. Rapid versus full systematic reviews: Validity in clinical practice? ANZ Journal of Surgery 2008, 78, 1037–1040.
22. Sampson, M., Tetzlaff, J. & Urquhart, C. Precision of health care systematic review searches in a cross-sectional sample. Research Synthesis Methods 2011, 2, 119–125.
23. Beckles, Z., Glover, S., Ashe, J., Stockton, S., Boynton, J., Lai, R. & Alderson, P. Searching CINAHL did not add value to clinical questions posed in NICE guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2013, 66, 1051–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.04.009.
24. Beyer, F. R. & Wright, K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. Health Information & Libraries Journal 2013, 30, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/hir.12009.
25. Hood, W. W. & Wilson, C. S. Overlap in bibliographic databases. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 2003, 54, 1091–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10301.
26. Löhönen, J., Isohanni, M., Nieminen, P. & Miettunen, J. Coverage of the bibliographic databases in mental health research. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry 2010, 64, 181–188.
27. Stevinson, C. & Lawlor, D. A. Searching multiple databases for systematic reviews: Added value or diminishing returns? Complementary Therapies in Medicine 2004, 12, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.003.