Peer-supported Open Dialogue: a thematic analysis of trainee perspectives on the approach and training

Journal of Mental Health

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 312-318

  Stockmann, Tom ^a   Wood, Lisa ^a   Enache, Gabriela ^a   Withers, Frankie ^a   Gavaghan, Lauren ^b   Razzaque, Russell ^a  

^a NORTH EAST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTH LONDON AND MAUDSLEY NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

education programme; focus groups; mental health; peer supported open dialogue; staff perspectives

Indexed keywords

DNA TRANSCRIPTION; EDUCATION PROGRAM; HUMAN; MENTAL HEALTH; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; STAFF; STUDENT; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; TRAINING; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATION; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL NETWORK; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MENTAL HEALTH; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SOCIAL NETWORKING; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

EID: 85021237524     PISSN: 09638237     EISSN: 13600567     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2017.1340609     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Andersen T., (1995). Reflecting processes. Acts of informing and forming. In: Friedman S, ed. The reflective team in action. New York: Guilford
2. Anderson H., (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities. New York: Basic Books
3. Ardito R, Rabellino D., (2011). Therapeutic alliance and outcome of psychotherapy: Historical excursus, measurements, and prospects for research. Front Psychol, 2, 1–11
4. Bracken P, Thomas P, Yeomans D, et al. (2012). Psychiatry beyond the current paradigm. Br J Psychiatry, 201, 430–4
5. Braun V, Clarke V., (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol, 3, 77–101
6. Eliacin J, Salyers M, Kukla M, Matthias M., (2015). Factors influencing patients’ preferences and perceived involvement in shared decision-making in mental health care. J Ment Health, 24, 24–8
7. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L., (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82
8. Hopfenbeck M., (2015). Peer-supported open dialogue. Context, 138, 29–31
9. Kitzinger J., (1995). Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311, 299
10. Krueger RA., (2002). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. Minnesota: University of Minnesota
11. Ljungberg A, Denhov A, Topor A., (2016). Non-helpful relationships with professionals–A literature review of the perspective of persons with severe mental illness. J Ment Health, 25, 267–77
12. Markova I, Linell P, Grossen M, Orvig AS., (2007). Dialogue in focus groups: Exploring socially shared knowledge. London: Equinox
13. Nel PW., (2006). Trainee perspectives on their family therapy training. J Fam Ther, 28, 307–28
14. NHS Staff Survey Results. (2015). Available from: http://www.nhsstaffsurveys.com/Page/1006/Latest-Results/2015-Results/
15. Olson M, Seikkula J, Ziedonis D., (2014). The key elements of dialogic practice in Open Dialogue. Worcester, MA: The University of Massachusetts Medical School. 2 September 2014, Version 1.1. Available from: http://umassmed.edu/psychiatry/globalinitiatives/opendialogue/
16. Paris E, Linville D, Rosen K., (2006). Marriage and family therapist interns' experiences of growth. J Marit Fam Ther, 32, 45–57
17. Razzaque R, Stockmann T., (2016). An introduction to peer-supported open dialogue. BJPsych Adv, 22, 348–56
18. Rhodes P, Nge C, Wallis A, et al. (2011). Learning and living systemic: Exploring the personal effects of family therapy training. Contemp Fam Ther, 33, 335
19. Samarakoon L, Fernando T, Rodrigo C, Rajapakse R., (2013). Learning styles and approaches to learning among medical undergraduates and postgraduates. BMC Med Educ, 13, 42–6
20. Seikkula J, Aaltonen J, Alakare B, et al. (2006). Five-year experience of first-episode nonaffective psychosis in open-dialogue approach: Treatment principles, follow-up outcomes, and two case studies. Psychother Res, 16, 214–28
21. Seikkula J, Aaltonen J, Rasinkangas A, et al. (2003). Open dialogue approach: Treatment principles and preliminary results of a two-year follow-up on first episode schizophrenia. Ethic Hum Sci Serv, 5, 163–82
22. Seikkula J, Alakare B, Aaltonen J., (2011a). The comprehensive open-dialogue approach in Western Lapland: II. Long-term stability of acute psychosis outcomes in advanced community care. Psychosis: Psychol Soc Integ Approach, 3, 192–204
23. Seikkula J, Olson ME., (2003). The open dialogue approach to acute psychosis: Its poetics and micropolitics. Fam Process, 42, 403–18
24. Seikkula J, Trimble D., (2005). Healing elements of therapeutic conversation: Dialogue as an embodiment of love. Fam Process, 44, 461–75
25. Seikkula J., (2011b). Becoming dialogical: Psychotherapy or a way of life? The Australian & New Zealand. J Fam Ther, 32, 179–93