Design of UAV for photogrammetric mission in Antarctic area

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering

Volumn 231, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1660-1675

  Goetzendorf Grabowski, Tomasz ^a   Rodzewicz, Miroslaw ^a  

^a WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

aerial monitoring; Aircraft design; Antarctic; flying qualities; photogrammetry; stability; UAV

Indexed keywords

BIRDS; CONVERGENCE OF NUMERICAL METHODS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY;

AERIAL MONITORING; AIRCRAFT DESIGN; ANTARCTIC; EXTREME TEMPERATURES; EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS; FLYING QUALITY; LOW-LEVEL FLIGHT; NATURAL ENVIRONMENTS;

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

EID: 85021179385     PISSN: 09544100     EISSN: 20413025     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0954410016656881     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Goraj Z,. Design Challenges associated with development of a new generation UAV. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2005; 77: 361-368.
2. Goetzendorf-Grabowski T, Frydrychewicz A, Goraj Z, et al. MALE UAV design of an increased reliability level. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2006; 78: 226-235.
3. Goraj Z, Rodzewicz M, Grendysa W, et al. Design and configuration layouts of an advanced long endurance UAV- lessons learnt after flight testing. In: 28th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Brisbane, 23-28 September 2012, paper.763.
4. Goraj Z, Kitmann K, Voit-Nitschmann R, et al. Design and Integration of Flexi Bird-a low cost sub-scale research aircraft for safety and environmental issues. In: 27th International Congress of the Aeronautical Sciences, Nice, 19-24 September 2010, paper.469.
5. Tømmervik H, Karlsen SR, Nilsen L, et al. Use of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in a multi-scale vegetation index study of Arctic plant communities in Adventdalen on Svalbard, EARSeL e Proceedings, Vol. 13, Special Issue 1: 34th EARSeL Symposium, Warsaw, 16-20 June 2014, pp.47-52.
6. Glowacki D, Hajduk J and Rodzewicz M. Methods of flight-path planning for UAV photogrammetry missions with consideration of aircraft dynamic properties. In: 5-th CEAS Air&Space conference "Challenges in European Aerospace" Delft, 7-11 September 2015, paper No 023.
7. Goraj Z. A specialized UAV for surveillance in windy, turbulent environment of the Antarctic coast. In: Proceedings of 29th ICAS Congress, St. Petersburg, 7-12 September 2014, ICAS 2014-0693.
8. Gadomski J, Hernik B, Goraj Z,. Analysis and optimisation of a male UAV loaded structure. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2006; 78: 120-131.
9. Goetzendorf-Grabowski T.: PANUKL potential solver: http://www.meil.pw.edu.pl/add/ADD/Teaching/Software/PANUKL.
10. Figat M, Goetzendorf-Grabowski T, Goraj Z,. Aerodynamic calculation of unmanned aircraft. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol 2005; 77: 467-474.
11. Raymer DP. Aircraft design: a conceptual approach. AIAA Education Series, 1999.
12. ESDU (Engineer Science Data Unit) reports, http://www.esdu.com/.
13. Goraj Z,. Flight dynamics models used in different national and international projects. Aircraft Eng Aerosp Technol: An International Journal 2014; 86: 166-178.
14. Nelson RC,. Flight stability and automatic control, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
15. Etkin B,. Dynamics of flight-stability and control, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1982.
16. Cook BH,. Flight dynamics principles, Cranfield, UK: Butterworth Heinemann, 1997.
17. Stevens BL, Lewis FL,. Aircraft control and simulation, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1992.
18. Goetzendorf-Grabowski T, Mieszalski D, Marcinkiewicz E,. Stability analysis using SDSA tool. Progr Aerosp Sci 2011; 47: 636-646.
19. European Aviation Safety Agency. Certification specifications for normal, utility, aerobatic, and commuter category aeroplanes-CS-23, Amendment 3, 2012.
20. MIL-F-8785C-Military specification flying qualities of piloted airplanes. 5 November 1980.
21. Zmarz A, Korczak-Abshire M, Storvold R, et al. Indicator species population monitoring in Antarctica with UAV, ISPRS-International Archives of the Photogrammetry. Remote Sensing Spatial Inform Sci 2015; 1: 189-193.