Simulation of potato yield in temperate condition by the AquaCrop model

Agricultural Water Management

Volumn 191, Issue , 2017, Pages 113-123

  Razzaghi, Fatemeh ^a   Zhou, Zhenjiang ^b   Andersen, Mathias N ^c   Plauborg, Finn ^c  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Canopy cover; Deficit irrigation; Modelling; Normalized water productivity; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

CROPS; CULTIVATION; FORESTRY; IRRIGATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; MODELS; PLANTS (BOTANY); SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOILS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

CANOPY COVER; DEFICIT IRRIGATION; DRY MATTER PRODUCTION; IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT; IRRIGATION TREATMENTS; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SOIL WATER CONTENT; WATER PRODUCTIVITY;

SOIL MOISTURE;

AGRICULTURAL MODELING; CANOPY GAP; CROP PRODUCTION; DRY MATTER; MAIZE; MODEL VALIDATION; POTATO; RICE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL WATER; WATER STRESS; WHEAT;

SOLANUM TUBEROSUM; TRITICUM AESTIVUM; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 85021145377     PISSN: 03783774     EISSN: 18732283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.008     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abedinpour, M., Sarangi, A., Rajput, T.B.S., Singh, M., Pathak, H., Ahmad, T., Performance evaluation of AquaCrop model for maize crop in a semi-arid environment. Agr. Water Manage. 110 (2012), 55––66.
2. Afshar, A., Neshat, A., Evaluation of AquaCrop computer model in the potato under irrigation management of continuity plan of Jiroft region, Kerman, Iran. Int. J. Adv. Biol. Biomed. Res. 1 (2013), 1669––1678.
3. Afshar, A., Afsharmanesh, G.R., Adeli, M., Malekian, A., Assessment of AquaCrop model in the simulation of potato yield and water use efficiency under different water regimes. J. Biol. Environ. Sci. 8 (2014), 79––86.
4. Andarzian, B., Bannayan, M., Steduto, P., Mazraeh, H., Barati, M., Barati, M., Rahnama, A., Validation and testing of the AquaCrop model under full and deficit irrigated wheat production in Iran. Agr. Water Manage. 100 (2011), 1––8.
5. Andersen, M.N., Jensen, C., Lösch, R., The interaction effects of potassium and drought in field-grown barley. I. Yield, water-use efficiency and growth. Acta. Agric. Scand. B-Plant Soil Sci. 42 (1992), 34––44.
6. Andersen, A., Rodvækst i forskellige jordtyper (Root growth in different soil types). Tidsskrift for Planteavl Beretning S-1827 Landbrugs-og Fiskeriministeriet, 1827, Statens Planteavlsforsøg, Copenhagen, 90 (in Danish).
7. Araya, A., Habtu, S., Hadgu, K.M., Kebede, A., Dejene, T., Test of AquaCrop model in simulating biomass and yield of water deficient and irrigated barley (Hordeum vulgare). Agr. Water Manage. 97 (2010), 1838––1846.
8. Chen, L., Zhang, J.G., Su, H.F., Guo, W., Weed identification method based on probabilistic neural network in the corn seedlings field. International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, IEEE, 2010.
9. de la Casa, A., Ovando, G., Bressanini, L., Martínez, J., Aquacrop model calibration in potato and its use to estimate yield variability under field conditions. Atmos. Clim. Sci. 3 (2013), 397–407.
10. Djurhuus, J., Hansen, S., Schelde, K., Jacobsen, O.H., Modelling mean nitrate leaching from spatially variable fields using effective hydraulic parameters. Geoderma 87 (1999), 261––279.
11. Doorenbos, J., Kassam, A., Yield response to water. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Irrigation and Drainage Paper, vol. 33, 1979, 257.
12. Farahani, H.J., Izzi, G., Oweis, T.Y., Parameterization and evaluation of the AquaCrop model for full and deficit irrigated cotton. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 469–476.
13. Garcia-vila, M., Fereres, E., Mateos, L., Orgaz, F., Steduto, P., Defecit irrigation optimization of cotton with AquaCrop. Agron. J. 101 (2008), 477––487.
14. Geerts, S., Raes, D., Garcia, M., Miranda, R., Cusicanqui, J.A., Taboada, C., Mendoza, J., Huanca, R., Mamani, A., Condori, O., Simulating yield response of quinoa to water availability with AquaCrop. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 499–508.
15. Ghanbbari, A., Tavassoli, A., Simulation of wheat yield using AquaCrop model in shirvan region. Int. J. Agri. Crop. Sci. 6 (2013), 342––352.
16. Greaves, G.E., Wang, Y.-M., Assessment of FAO AquaCrop model for simulating maize growth and productivity under deficit irrigation in a tropical environment. Water, 8, 2016, 557.
17. Heng, L.K., Hsiao, T., Evett, S., Howell, T., Steduto, P., Validating the FAO AquaCrop model for irrigated and water deficient field maize. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 488––498.
18. Hsiao, T.C., Heng, L., Steduto, P., Rojas-Lara, B., Raes, D., Fereres, E., AquaCrop-The FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: III. Parameterization and testing for maize. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 448–459.
19. Hsiao, T.C., Plant responses to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24 (1973), 519–570.
20. Jin, X.L., Feng, H.K., Zhu, X.K., Li, Z.H., Song, S.N., Song, X.Y., Yang, G.J., Xu, X.G., Guo, W.S., Assessment of the AquaCrop model for use in simulation of irrigated winter wheat canopy cover, biomass, and grain yield in the North China Plain. PLoS One, 9, 2014.
21. Mabhaudhi, T., Modi, A.T., Beletse, Y.G., Parametrization and testing of AquaCrop for South African bambara groundnut landrace. Agron. J. 1 (2013), 243–251.
22. Mehraban, A., Simulation of wheat yield by AquaCrop model. Int. J. Farm. Allied Sci. 2 (2013), 939–943.
23. Mkhabela, M.S., Bullock, P.R., Performance of the FAO AquaCrop model for wheat grain yield and soil moisture simulation in Western Canada. Agr. Water Manage. 110 (2012), 16–24.
24. Montoya, F., Camargo, D., Ortega, J., Córcoles, J., Domínguez, A., Evaluation of Aquacrop model for a potato crop under different irrigation conditions. Agr. Water Manage. 164 (2016), 267–280.
25. Nash, J.E., Sutcliffe, J.V., River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I—a discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 10 (1970), 282–290.
26. Osakabe, Y., Osakabe, K., Shinozaki, K., Tran, L.-S.P., Response of plants to water stress. Front. Plant Sci., 5, 2014, 86.
27. Patel, N., Kumar, P., Singh, N., Performance Evaluation of AquaCrop in Simulating Potato Yield Under Varying Water Availability Condition. 2008, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi-110012, India.
28. Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Fereres, E., AquaCrop–the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 438–447.
29. Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T., Fereres, E., Reference Manual AquaCrop (Version 4.0). AquaCrop. 2012 (website http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquacrop.html).
30. Saab, M.T.A., Todorovic, M., Albrizio, R., Comparing AquaCrop and CropSyst models in simulating barley growth and yield under different water and nitrogen regimes. Does calibration year influence the performance of crop growth models?. Agr. Water Manage. 147 (2015), 21–33.
31. Steduto, P., Hsiao, T.C., Raes, D., Fereres, E., AquaCrop-the FAO crop model to simulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 426––437.
32. Stricevic, R., Dzeletovic, Z., Djurovic, N., Cosic, M., Application of the AquaCrop model to simulate the biomassof Miscanthus x giganteus under different nutrient supply conditions. Global Change Biol. Bioenergy 7 (2015), 1203––1210.
33. Tavakoli, A.R., Moghadam, M.M., Sepaskhah, A.R., Evaluation of the AquaCrop model for barley production under deficit irrigation and rainfed condition in Iran. Agr. Water Manage. 161 (2015), 136–146.
34. Todorovic, M., Albrizio, R., Zivotic, L., Saab, M.-T.A., Stöckle, C., Steduto, P., Assessment of AquaCrop, CropSyst, and WOFOST models in the simulation of sunflower growth under different water regimes. Agron. J. 101 (2009), 509–521.
35. Toulmin, C., Drought and the farming sector: loss of farm animals and post-drought rehabilitation. Dev. Policy Rev. 5 (1987), 125––148.
36. Toumi, J., Er-Raki, S., Ezzahar, J., Khabba, S., Jarlan, L., Chehbouni, A., Performance assessment of AquaCrop model for estimating evapotranspiration, soil water content and grain yield of winter wheat in Tensift Al Haouz (Morocco): application to irrigation management. Agr. Water Manage. 163 (2016), 219––235.
37. Wellens, J., Raes, D., Traore, F., Denis, A., Djaby, B., Tychon, B., Performance assessment of the FAO AquaCrop model for irrigated cabbage on farmer plots in a semi-arid environment. Agr. Water Mange. 127 (2013), 40––47.
38. Wilhite, D.A., Quantification of Agricultural Drought for Effective Drought Mitigation and Preparedness: Key Issues and Challenges. 2011, Drought Mitigation Center Faculty Publications Paper 82.
39. Willmott, C.J., Ackleson, S.G., Davis, R.E., Feddema, J.J., Klink, K.M., Legates, D.R., O'Donnell, J., Rowe, C.M., Statistics for the evaluation of model performance. J. Geophys. Res. 90 (1985), 8995–9005.
40. Zeleke, K.T., Luckett, D., Cowley, R., Calibration and testing of the FAO AquaCrop model for canola. Agron. J. 103 (2011), 1610–1618.
41. Zhang, W., Liu, W., Xue, Q., Chen, J., Han, X., Evaluation of the AquaCrop model for simulating yield response of winter wheat to water on the southern Loess Plateau of China. Water Sci. Technol. 68 (2013), 821––828.
42. Zhou, Z., Andersen, M.N., Plauborg, F., Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of potato affected by different N fertigation and irrigation regimes. Eur. J. Agron. 81 (2016), 129–137.