Erratum: Tobacco town: Computational modeling of policy options to reduce tobacco retailer density (American Journal of Public Health (2017) 107:5 (740-746) DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303685);Tobacco town: Computational modeling of policy options to reduce tobacco retailer density

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 107, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 740-746

  Luke, Douglas A ^a   Hammond, Ross A ^b   Combs, Todd ^a   Sorg, Amy ^a   Kasman, Matt ^b   MacK Crane, Austen ^b   Ribisl, Kurt M ^c   Henriksen, Lisa ^d  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

^b BROOKINGS INSTITUTION   (United States)

^c The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POPULATION DENSITY; PUBLIC HEALTH; SIMULATION; TOBACCO USE; COMMERCIAL PHENOMENA; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INCOME; PUBLIC POLICY; SCHOOL; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOBACCO; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

COMMERCE; HUMANS; INCOME; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PUBLIC POLICY; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SCHOOLS; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; TOBACCO INDUSTRY; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 85020748271     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303685e     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Brownson RC, Haire-Joshu D, Luke DA. Shaping the context of health: a review of environmental and policy approaches in the prevention of chronic diseases. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006;27:341-370.
2. Ashe M, Jernigan D, Kline R, Galaz R. Land use planning and the control of alcohol, tobacco, firearms, and fast food restaurants. Am J Public Health. 2003;93(9): 1404-1408.
3. Federal Trade Commission Cigarette Report for 2013. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission; 2016.
4. Hoefges M. Protecting tobacco advertising under the commercial speech doctrine: the Constitutional impact of Lorillard Tobacco Co. Commun Law Policy. 2003;8(3): 267-311.
5. Lange T, Hoefges M, Ribisl KM. Regulating tobacco product advertising and promotions in the retail environment: a roadmap for states and localities. J Law Med Ethics. 2015;43(4):878-896.
6. Ackerman A, Etow A, Bartel S, Ribisl KM. Reducing the density and number of tobacco retailers: policy solutions and legal issues. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; Epub ahead of print.
7. Institute of Medicine. Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for the Nation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007.
8. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Reducing Underage Drinking: A Collective Responsibility. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2004.
9. Schneider JE, Reid RJ, Peterson NA, Lowe JB, Hughey J. Tobacco outlet density and demographics at the tract level of analysis in Iowa: implications for envi-ronmentally based prevention initiatives. Prev Sci. 2005; 6(4):319-325.
10. Schleicher NC, Johnson TO, Fortmann SP, Henriksen L. Tobacco outlet density near home and school: associations with smoking and norms among US teens. Prev Med. 2016;91:287-293.
11. Sanders-Jackson A, Parikh NM, Schleicher NC, Fortmann SP, Henriksen L. Convenience store visits by US adolescents: rationale for healthier retail environments. Health Place. 2015;34:63-66.
12. McCarthy WJ, Mistry R, Lu Y, Patel M, Zheng H, Dietsch B.Density of tobacco retailers near schools: effects on tobacco use among students. Am J Public Health. 2009; 99(11):2006-2013.
13. Chuang YC, Cubbin C, Ahn D, Winkleby MA. Effects of neighbourhood socioeconomic status and convenience store concentration on individual level smoking. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59(7): 568-573.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System. 2016. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/statesystem. Accessed June 15, 2016.
15. Reducing Tobacco Retail Density in San Francisco: A Case Study. San Francisco, CA: Bright Research Group for the San Francisco Tobacco-Free Project; 2016.
16. Counter Tobacco. Flavored tobacco products. 2016. Available at: http://countertobacco.org/resources-tools/evidence-summaries/flavored-tobacco-products. Accessed October 27, 2016.
17. Homer JB, Hirsch GB. System dynamics modeling for public health: background and opportunities. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):452-458.
18. Levy DT, Bauer JE, Lee HR. Simulation modeling and tobacco control: creating more robust public health policies. Am J Public Health. 2006;96(3):494-498.
19. Mendez D, Warner KE. Smoking prevalence in2010: why the Healthy People goal is unattainable. Am J Public Health. 2000;90(3):401-403.
20. Luke DA, Stamatakis KA. Systems science methods in public health: dynamics, networks, and agents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2012;33:357-376.
21. Epstein JM. Modelling to contain pandemics. Nature. 2009;460(7256):687.
22. Hammond RA. Complex systems modeling for obesity research. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009;6(3):A97.
23. Van Wave TW, Scutchfield FD, Honore PA. Recent advances in public health systems research in the United States. Annu Rev Public Health. 2010;31:283-295.
24. Yang Y, Diez-Roux A, Evenson KR, Colabianchi N. Examining the impact of the walking school bus with an agent-based model. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(7): 1196-1203.
25. Golden SD, Farrelly MC, Luke DA, Ribisl KM. Comparing projected impacts of cigarette floor price and excise tax policies on socioeconomic disparities in smoking. Tob Control. 2016;25(suppl 1):i60-i66.
26. Pearson AL, Cleghorn CL, van der Deen FS, et al. Tobacco retail outlet restrictions: health and cost impacts from multistate life-table modelling in a national population. Tob Control. 2016; Epub ahead of print.
27. Institute of Medicine. Assessing the Use of Agent-Based Models for Tobacco Regulation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
28. Hammond RA. Considerations and best practices in agent-based modeling to inform policy. Commissioned for Institute of Medicine report: Assessing the Use of Agent-Based Models for Tobacco Regulation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2015.
29. North MJ, Collier NT, Ozik J, et al. Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony. Complex Adaptive Syst Modeling. 2013;1(1):3.
30. Luke DA. Getting the big picture in community science: methods that capture context. Am J Community Psychol. 2005;35(3-4):185-200.
31. Ormerod P, Rosewell B. Validation and verification of agent-based models in the social sciences. In: Squazzoni F, ed. Epistemological Aspects of Computer Simulation in the Social Sciences. Vol. 5466. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2009: 130-140.
32. Henriksen L, Schleicher NC, Barker DC, Liu Y, Chaloupka FJ. Prices for tobacco and nontobacco products in pharmacies versus other stores: results from retail marketing surveillance in California and in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2016;106(10): 1858-1864.
33. Bruch E, Feinberg F. Decision making processes in social contexts. Annu Rev Sociol. In press.
34. Luke DA, Sorg AA, Combs T, et al. Tobacco retail policy landscape: a longitudinal survey of US states. Tob Control. 2016;25(suppl 1):i44-i51.
35. NYC Smoke-Free, Public Health Solutions. Tobacco proliferation. Available at: http://nycsmokefree.org/issues/tobacco-proliferation. Accessed March 6, 2015.
36. Luke DA, Ribisl KM, Smith C, Sorg AA. Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act: banning outdoor tobacco advertising near schools and playgrounds. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40(3):295-302.
37. Ribisl KM, Luke DA, Bohannon DL, Sorg AA, Moreland-Russell S. Reducing disparities in tobacco retailer density by banning tobacco product sales near schools. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016; Epub ahead of print.
38. Ribisl KM, Luke DA, Henriksen L. The case for a concerted push to reduce place-based disparities in smoking-related cancers. JAMA Intern Med. 2016; 176(12):1799-1800.
39. Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs-2014. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
40. Janssen MA, Ostrom E. Empirically based, agent-based models. Ecol Soc. 2006;11(2):37.
41. Epstein JM. Why model? J Artif Soc Soc Simul. 2008; 11(4):12.