The Ethics of Online Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: Challenges, opportunities, and directions in ethical decision-making

Applied Linguistics Review

Volumn 8, Issue 2-3, 2017, Pages 163-167

  Spilioti, Tereza ^a   Tagg, Caroline ^b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020538452     PISSN: 18686303     EISSN: 18686311     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2016-1033     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. BAAL. 2016. Recommendations on good practice in applied linguistics. http://www.baal.org.uk/goodpractice-full-2016.pdf (Last accessed 20 July 2016).
2. Boyd, d. 2011. Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. In Z. Papacharissi (ed.), A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites, 39-58. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
3. Ess, C. 2015. New selves, new research ethics? In H. Fossheim & H. Ingierd (eds.), Internet research ethics, 48-76. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk.
4. Marwick, A. & d. boyd. 2011. I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1). 114-133.
5. Papacharissi, Z. (ed.). 2011. A networked self: Identity, community, and culture on social network sites. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
6. RCUK. 2014. Pathways to impact-research Councils UK. http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/innovation/impacts/(Last accessed 20 July 2016).
7. Sandvig, C. 2016. Why I am suing the government. Social Media Collective Research Blog, 1 July 2016. https://socialmediacollective.org/2016/07/01/why-i-am-suing-the-government/(Last accessed 20 July 2016).
8. Tagg, Caroline, Lyons Agnieszka, Hu Rachel & Rock Frances. 2016. The ethics of digital ethnography in a team project. Applied Linguistics Review. doi:10.1515/applirev-2016-1040.