Test-retest reliability and agreement between in-person and video assessment of facial mimetic function using the eFACE facial grading system

JAMA Facial Plastic Surgery

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 206-211

  Banks, Caroline A ^a   Jowett, Nate ^a   Hadlock, Tessa A ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISABILITY; FACIAL PARALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VIDEORECORDING;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; FACIAL PARALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 85020494272     PISSN: 21686076     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2016.1620     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Botman JW, Jongkees LB. The result of intratemporal treatment of facial palsy. Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel). 1955;17(2):80-100.
2. Adour KK, Swanson PJ Jr. Facial paralysis in 403 consecutive patients: emphasis on treatment response in patients with Bell's palsy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971;75(6):1284-1301.
3. House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1985;93(2):146-147.
4. Ross BG, Fradet G, Nedzelski JM. Development of a sensitive clinical facial grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;114(3):380-386.
5. Hato N, Fujiwara T, Gyo K, Yanagihara N. Yanagihara facial nerve grading system as a prognostic tool in Bell's palsy. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(9):1669-1672.
6. Banks CA, Bhama PK, Park J, Hadlock CR, Hadlock TA. Clinician-graded electronic facial paralysis assessment: the eFACE. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(2):223e-230e.
7. Murty GE, Diver JP, Kelly PJ, O'Donoghue GM, Bradley PJ. The Nottingham System: objective assessment of facial nerve function in the clinic. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;110(2):156-161.
8. de Ru JA, Braunius WW, van Benthem PP, Busschers WB, Hordijk GJ. Grading facial nerve function: why a new grading system, the MoReSS, should be proposed. Otol Neurotol. 2006;27(7):1030-1036.
9. Vrabec JT, Backous DD, Djalilian HR, et al; Facial Nerve Disorders Committee. Facial Nerve Grading System 2.0. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(4):445-450.
10. Burres S, Fisch U. The comparison of facial grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1986;112(7):755-758.
11. Fattah AY, Gavilan J, Hadlock TA, et al. Survey of methods of facial palsy documentation in use by members of the Sir Charles Bell Society. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(10):2247-2251.
12. Jowett N, Hadlock TA. An evidence-based approach to facial reanimation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2015;23(3):313-334.
13. Banks CA, Jowett N, Hadlock CR, Hadlock TA. Weighting of facial grading variables to disfigurement in facial palsy. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(4):292-298.
14. Gaudin RA, Robinson M, Banks CA, Baiungo J, Jowett N, Hadlock TA. Emerging vs time-tested methods of facial grading among patients with facial paralysis. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2016;18(4):251-257.
15. Jowett N, Hadlock TA. A contemporary approach to facial reanimation. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2015;17(4):293-300.
16. Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1994;6(4):284-290. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307-310.