Erratum: The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli (Current Biology (2017) 27(12) (1825–1828.e3) (S0960982217305808) (10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044));The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli

Current Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2017, Pages 1825-1828.e3

  Reid, Vincent M ^a   Dunn, Kirsty ^a   Young, Robert J ^b   Amu, Johnson ^c   Donovan, Tim ^d   Reissland, Nadja ^e  

^a LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c BLACKPOOL TEACHING HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CUMBRIA   (United Kingdom)

^e DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

face preference; fetal behavior; fetus; prenatal; ultrasound; visual perception

Indexed keywords

FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; THIRD TRIMESTER PREGNANCY; VISION;

FEMALE; FETUS; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, THIRD; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 85020479344     PISSN: 09609822     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.02.025     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. DeCasper, A.J., Fifer, W.P., Of human bonding: newborns prefer their mothers’ voices. Science 208 (1980), 1174–1176.
2. Zoia, S., Blason, L., D'Ottavio, G., Bulgheroni, M., Pezzetta, E., Scabar, A., Castiello, U., Evidence of early development of action planning in the human foetus: a kinematic study. Exp. Brain Res. 176 (2007), 217–226.
3. Witt, M., Reutter, K., Embryonic and early fetal development of human taste buds: a transmission electron microscopical study. Anat. Rec. 246 (1996), 507–523.
4. López-Teijón, M., García-Faura, Á., Prats-Galino, A., Fetal facial expression in response to intravaginal music emission. Ultrasound 23 (2015), 216–223.
5. Del Giudice, M., Alone in the dark? Modeling the conditions for visual experience in human fetuses. Dev. Psychobiol. 53 (2011), 214–219.
6. Johnson, M.H., Morton, J., Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition. 1991, Basil Blackwell.
7. Fantz, R.L., Pattern vision in newborn infants. Science 140 (1963), 296–297.
8. Pitti, A., Kuniyoshi, Y., Quoy, M., Gaussier, P., Modeling the minimal newborn's intersubjective mind: the visuotopic-somatotopic alignment hypothesis in the superior colliculus. PLoS ONE, 8, 2013, e69474.
9. Jacques, S.L., Optical properties of biological tissues: a review. Phys. Med. Biol. 58 (2013), R37–R61.
10. Peters, V.G., Wyman, D.R., Patterson, M.S., Frank, G.L., Optical properties of normal and diseased human breast tissues in the visible and near infrared. Phys. Med. Biol. 35 (1990), 1317–1334.
11. Hendrickson, A., Possin, D., Vajzovic, L., Toth, C.A., Histologic development of the human fovea from midgestation to maturity. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 154 (2012), 767–778.e2.
12. Hendrickson, A., Drucker, D., The development of parafoveal and mid-peripheral human retina. Behav. Brain Res. 49 (1992), 21–31.
13. Dubowitz, L.M.S., Dubowitz, V., Morante, A., Visual function in the newborn: a study of preterm and full-term infants. Brain Dev. 2 (1980), 15–29.
14. Dubowitz, L.M.S., Dubowitz, V., Morante, A., Verghote, M., Visual function in the preterm and fullterm newborn infant. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 22 (1980), 465–475.
15. Morante, A., Dubowitz, L.M.S., Leven, M., Dubowitz, V., The development of visual function in normal and neurologically abnormal preterm and fullterm infants. Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 24 (1982), 771–784.
16. Romeo, D.M., Ricci, D., Serrao, F., Gallini, F., Olivieri, G., Cota, F., Romagnoli, C., Mercuri, E., Visual function assessment in late-preterm newborns. Early Hum. Dev. 88 (2012), 301–305.
17. Baraldi, P., Ferrari, F., Fonda, S., Penne, A., Vision in the neonate (full-term and premature): preliminary result of the application of some testing methods. Doc. Ophthalmol. 51 (1981), 101–112.
18. Rao, S., Chun, C., Fan, J., Kofron, J.M., Yang, M.B., Hegde, R.S., Ferrara, N., Copenhagen, D.R., Lang, R.A., A direct and melanopsin-dependent fetal light response regulates mouse eye development. Nature 494 (2013), 243–246.
19. Stanojevic, M., Kurjak, A., Continuity between fetal and neonatal neurobehavior. J. Ultra Obst.Gyne. 2 (2008), 64–75.
20. DiPietro, J.A., Costigan, K.A., Voegtline, K.M., Studies in fetal behavior: revisited, renewed and reimagined. Mono. Soc.r Res. Child Dev. 80 (2015), 1–94.
21. Rogers, L.J., Light input and the reversal of functional lateralization in the chicken brain. Behav. Brain Res. 38 (1990), 211–221.
22. Dunn, K., Reissland, N., Reid, V.M., The functional foetal brain: a systematic preview of methodological factors in reporting foetal visual and auditory capacity. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 13 (2015), 43–52.
23. Simion, F., Valenza, E., Umiltà, C., Dalla Barba, B., Preferential orienting to faces in newborns: a temporal-nasal asymmetry. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 24 (1998), 1399–1405.
24. Wilkinson, N., Paikan, A., Gredebäck, G., Rea, F., Metta, G., Staring us in the face? An embodied theory of innate face preference. Dev. Sci. 17 (2014), 809–825.
25. Johnson, M.H., Senju, A., Tomalski, P., The two-process theory of face processing: modifications based on two decades of data from infants and adults. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 50 (2015), 169–179.
26. Reissland, N., Francis, B., Mason, J., Lincoln, K., Do facial expressions develop before birth?. PLoS ONE, 6, 2011, e24081.
27. Myowa-Yamakoshi, M., Takeshita, H., Do human fetuses anticipate self-directed actions? A study by four-dimensional (4D) ultrasonography. Infancy 10 (2006), 289–301.
28. Reissland, N., Francis, B., Aydin, E., Mason, J., Schaal, B., The development of anticipation in the fetus: a longitudinal account of human fetal mouth movements in reaction to and anticipation of touch. Dev. Psychobiol. 56 (2014), 955–963.
29. Simion, F., Regolin, L., Bulf, H., A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105 (2008), 809–813.
30. Vallortigara, G., Regolin, L., Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006), R279–R280.
31. Abbott, A., Neuroscience: the brain, interrupted. Nature 518 (2015), 24–26.
32. Rochat, P., What Is It Like to Be a Newborn? Oxford Handbook of the Self. Gallagher, S., (eds.), 2011, Oxford University Press.
33. Nijhuis, J.G., Prechtl, H.F.R., Martin, C.B. Jr., Bots, R.S.G.M., Are there behavioural states in the human fetus?. Early Hum. Dev. 6 (1982), 177–195.
34. Stockman, A., Jägle, H., Pirzer, M., Sharpe, L.T., The dependence of luminous efficiency on chromatic adaptation. J. Vis. 8 (2008), 1–26.
35. Johnson, M.H., Dziurawiec, S., Ellis, H., Morton, J., Newborns’ preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 40 (1991), 1–19.
36. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G., The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 (1977), 159–174.