Stimulating technological innovation through incentives: Perceptions of Australian and Brazilian firms

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 146, Issue , 2019, Pages 403-412

  Yigitcanlar, Tan ^a   Sabatini Marques, Jamile ^b   da Costa, Eduardo Moreira ^b   Kamruzzaman, Md ^a   Ioppolo, Giuseppe ^c  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SANTA CATARINA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MESSINA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Australia; Brazil; Incentives; Innovation; Knowledge economy; Knowledge based economic development; National innovation system; Technology firms

Indexed keywords

C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); ECONOMICS; INVESTMENTS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; RISK MANAGEMENT; TAXATION;

AUSTRALIA; BRAZIL; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; INCENTIVES; KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY; NATIONAL INNOVATION SYSTEMS;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ECONOMIC GROWTH; INCENTIVE; INNOVATION; KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY; PERCEPTION; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT;

AUSTRALIA; BRAZIL;

EID: 85020463773     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.039     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Aquilani, B., Silvestri, C., Ioppolo, G., Ruggieri, A., The challenging transition to bio-economies. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.153.
2. Australian Government, Australian Innovation System Report. 2014, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.
3. Australian Government, National Innovation and Science Agenda. 2015, Canberra, Commonwealth of Australia.
4. Azzoni, C.R., Economic growth and regional income inequality in Brazil. Ann. Reg. Sci. 35:1 (2001), 133–152.
5. Baum, S., O'Connor, K., Yigitcanlar, T., The implications of creative industries for regional outcomes. Int. J. Foresight Innov. Policy 5:1–3 (2009), 44–64.
6. Baumol, W., The Free Market Innovation Machine. 2002, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
7. Betz, F., Managing Technological Innovation. 2003, John Wiley & Sons, London.
8. Bröcker, J., Dohse, D., Soltwedel, R., (eds.) Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition, 2012, Berlin, Springer.
9. Burton, J.A., Knowledge Capitalism. 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10. Byun, J., Park, H.W., Hong, J.P., An international comparison of competitiveness in knowledge services. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 114:1 (2017), 203–213.
11. Carayannis, E.G., Goletsis, Y., Grigoroudis, E., Composite innovation metrics. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 2017, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.008.
12. Carboni, O.A., The effect of public support on investment and R&D. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 117:1 (2017), 282–295.
13. Carrillo, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Garcia, B., Lonnqvist, A., Knowledge and the City. 2014, Routledge, New York.
14. CMSS, Brazilian Innovation System. 2016, Brasilia, Centre of Management and Strategic Studies (CMSS).
15. Cohen, W.M., Goto, A., Nagata, A., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the US. Res. Policy 31:8 (2002), 1349–1367.
16. Cooke, P., Leydesdorff, L., Regional development in the knowledge-based economy. J. Technol. Transfer. 31:1 (2006), 5–15.
17. Crespi, G., Zuniga, P., Innovation and productivity. World Dev. 40:2 (2012), 273–290.
18. Cui, Y., Jiao, J., Jiao, H., Technological innovation in BRICS. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 107:1 (2016), 28–36.
19. Dedehayir, O., Mäkinen, S.J., Ortt, J.R., Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 2016, 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.028.
20. Doran, J., Ryan, G., Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm performance. Eur. J. Innov. Manag. 15:4 (2012), 421–441.
21. Dunning, J.H., Regions, Globalization, and the Knowledge Economy. 2000, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
22. Eisenhardt, K.M., Building theories from case study research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 14:4 (1989), 532–550.
23. EU, World Corporate top R&D Investors. 2015, Publications Office of the EU, Luxembourg.
24. Evangelista, R., Perani, G., Rapiti, F., Archibugi, D., Nature and impact of innovation in manufacturing industry. Res. Policy 26:4 (1997), 521–536.
25. Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. 1967, Aldine, Chicago.
26. Guan, J., Yam, R.C., Effects of government financial incentives on firms' innovation performance in China. Res. Policy 44:1 (2015), 273–282.
27. Guellec, D., Potterie, B., The impact of public R&D expenditure on business R&D. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 12:3 (2003), 225–243.
28. Hashi, I., Stojčić, N., The impact of innovation activities on firm performance using a multi-stage model. Res. Policy 42:2 (2013), 353–366.
29. Hewitt-Dundas, N., Roper, S., Output additionality of public support for innovation. Eur. Plan. Stud. 18:1 (2010), 107–122.
30. Heydebreck, P., Klofsten, M., Maier, J., Innovation support for new technology-based firms. R&D Manag. 30:1 (2000), 89–100.
31. Huggins, R., The growth of knowledge-intensive business services. Eur. Plan. Stud. 19:8 (2011), 1459–1480.
32. Huggins, R., Izushi, H., Knowledge-based development in leading regions across the globe. Urban Stud. 50:5 (2013), 1030–1048.
33. Ioppolo, G., Saija, G., Salomone, R., Developing a territory balanced scorecard approach to manage projects for local development. Land Use Policy 29:1 (2012), 629–640.
34. Ioppolo, G., Cucurachi, S., Salomone, R., Saija, G., Shi, L., Sustainable local development and environmental governance. Sustainability, 8(2), 2016, 180.
35. Jiao, H., Zhou, J., Gao, T., Liu, X., The more interactions the better?. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 110:1 (2016), 13–20.
36. Kang, K.N., Park, H., Influence of government R&D support and inter-firm collaborations on innovation in Korean biotechnology SMEs. Technovation 32:1 (2012), 68–78.
37. Kaufmann, A., Tödtling, F., How effective is innovation support for SMEs?. Technovation 22:3 (2002), 147–159.
38. Leiblein, M.J., Madsen, T.L., Unbundling competitive heterogeneity. Strateg. Manag. J. 30:7 (2009), 711–735.
39. Lerner, J., Wulf, J., Innovation and incentives. Rev. Econ. Stat. 89:4 (2007), 634–644.
40. Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., The triple helix as a model for innovation studies. Sci. Public Policy 25:3 (1998), 195–203.
41. Lonnqvist, A., Kapyla, J., Salonius, H., Yigitcanlar, T., Knowledge that matters. Eur. Plan. Stud. 22:10 (2014), 2011–2029.
42. Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., The Knowledge-Creating Company. 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
43. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Hirata, T., Managing Flow. 2008, Houndmills, Palgrave McMillan.
44. Norberg-Bohm, V., Creating incentives for environmentally enhancing technological change. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 65:2 (2000), 125–148.
45. OECD, OECD Innovation Strategy. 2010, OECD, Paris.
46. OECD, Science, Technology, and Innovation Profile: Brazil. 2016, OECD, Paris.
47. Olcay, G.A., Bulu, M., Who should really get government support. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Dev. 6:1 (2015), 34–49.
48. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., Urban knowledge and innovation spaces. Asia Pac. J. Innov. Entrep. 8:1 (2014), 15–38.
49. Pancholi, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., Place making facilitators of knowledge and innovation spaces. Int. J. Knowledge-Based Dev. 6:3 (2015), 215–240.
50. Ponds, R., Van Oort, F., Frenken, K., Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration. J. Econ. Geogr. 10:2 (2010), 231–255.
51. Proksch, D., Haberstroh, M.M., Pinkwart, A., Increasing the national innovative capacity. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 116:1 (2017), 256–270.
52. Radas, S., Anić, I.D., Tafro, A., Wagner, V., The effects of public support schemes on small and medium enterprises. Technovation 38:1 (2015), 15–30.
53. Rao-Nicholson, R., Vorley, T., Khan, Z., Social innovation in emerging economies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang., 2017, 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.013.
54. Rasiah, R., Shahrivar, R.B., Yap, X.S., Institutional support, innovation capabilities and exports. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 109:1 (2016), 69–75.
55. Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Da Costa, E., Incentivizing innovation. Asia Pac. J. Innov. Entrep. 9:1 (2015), 31–56.
56. Sabatini-Marques, J., Yigitcanlar, T., Da Costa, E., Australian innovation ecosystem. Asia Pac. J. Innov. Entrep. 9:2 (2015), 3–28.
57. Salazar, M., Holbrook, A., A debate on innovation surveys. Sci. Public Policy 31:4 (2004), 254–266.
58. Schumpeter, J., The Theory of Economic Development. 1934, Oxford University Press, London.
59. Scotchmer, S., Innovation and Incentives. 2004, MIT press, Boston.
60. Silva, E.D., Silberglitt, R., Machado, L.C., Maia, J.M., Cagnin, C.H., A portfolio analysis methodology to inform innovation policy and foresight. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 115:1 (2017), 338–347.
61. Taddeo, R., Simboli, A., Ioppolo, G., Morgante, A., Industrial symbiosis, networking and innovation. Sustainability, 9(2), 2017, 169.
62. Thomson, R., Jensen, P., The effects of government subsidies on business R&D employment. Natl. Tax J. 66:2 (2013), 281–310.
63. Veloso, F., Soto, J.M., Incentives, infrastructure and institutions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 66:1 (2001), 87–109.
64. Wolfe, D.A., Bramwell, A., Innovation, creativity and governance. Innovation 10:2–3 (2008), 170–182.
65. Yigitcanlar, T., Making space and place for the knowledge economy. Eur. Plan. Stud. 18:11 (2010), 1769–1786.
66. Yigitcanlar, T., Technology and the City. 2016, Routledge, New York.
67. Yigitcanlar, T., O'Connor, K., Westerman, C., The making of knowledge cities. Cities 25:2 (2008), 63–72.
68. Yigitcanlar, T., Guaralda, M., Taboada, M., Pancholi, S., Place making for knowledge generation and innovation. J. Urban Technol. 23:1 (2016), 115–146.
69. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research, Design and Methods. 2003, Sage, Newbury Park.
70. Yin, R.K., Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. 2011, Guilford Press, London.
71. Yun, J., Lee, D., Ahn, H., Park, K., Lee, S., Yigitcanlar, T., Not deep learning but autonomous learning of open innovation for sustainable artificial intelligence. Sustainability, 8(8), 2016, 797.
72. Zuniga, P., Crespi, G., Innovation strategies and employment in Latin American firms. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 24:1 (2013), 1–17.