Predicting Ideological Prejudice

Psychological Science

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 713-722

  Brandt, Mark J ^a  

^a TILBURG UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

ideology; intergroup dynamics; open data; open materials; prejudice; preregistered; stereotyped attitudes

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; STEREOTYPING;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; POLITICS; PREJUDICE; STEREOTYPING;

EID: 85020392516     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797617693004     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. American National Election Studies. (2015). The ANES 2012 Time Series Study [Data file]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan (Producers). Retrieved from http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_timeseries_2012/anes_timeseries_2012.htm
2. American National Election Studies. (2016). The ANES 2016 Pilot Study [Data file]. Stanford University and the University of Michigan (Producers). Retrieved from http://www.electionstudies.org/studypages/anes_pilot_2016/anes_pilot_2016.htm
3. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S., (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.
4. Berinsky A. J., Huber G. A., Lenz G. S., (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368.
5. Brandt M. J., Crawford J. T., (2016). Answering unresolved questions about the relationship between cognitive ability and prejudice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7, 884–892.
6. Brandt M. J., Reyna C., Chambers J. R., Crawford J. T., Wetherell G., (2014). The ideological-conflict hypothesis: Intolerance among both liberals and conservatives. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 27–34.
7. Brandt M. J., Van Tongeren D. R., (2017). People both high and low on religious fundamentalism are prejudiced toward dissimilar groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 76–97.
8. Byrne D., (1969). Attitudes and attraction. In Berkowitz L., (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 35–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
9. Chambers J. R., Schlenker B. R., Collisson B., (2013). Ideology and prejudice: The role of value conflicts. Psychological Science, 24, 140–149.
10. Clifford S., Jewell R. M., Waggoner P. D., (2015). Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology? Research & Politics, 2. doi:10.1177/2053168015622072
11. Clinton B., (2014, November 20). We only have one remaining bigotry: We don’t want to be around anybody who disagrees with us. New Republic. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20150419150524/http://www.newrepublic.com/article/120330/bill-clinton-speech-new-republics-100-year-anniversary-gala
12. Correll J., Judd C. M., Park B., Wittenbrink B., (2010). Measuring prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination. In Dovidio J. F., Hewstone M., Glick P., Esses V. M., (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination (pp. 45–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Crandall C. S., Eshleman A., O’Brien L., (2002). Social norms and the expression and suppression of prejudice: The struggle for internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 359–378.
14. Crawford J. T., Brandt M. J., Inbar Y., Chambers J. R., Motyl M., (2017). Social and economic ideologies differentially predict prejudice across the political spectrum, but social issues are most divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112, 383–412.
15. Crawford J. T., Kay S. A., Duke K. E., (2015). Speaking out of both sides of their mouths: Biased political judgments within (and between) individuals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 422–430.
16. Duckitt J., (2006). Differential effects of right wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on outgroup attitudes and their mediation by threat from and competitiveness to outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 684–696.
17. Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J., Glick P., (2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 77–83.
18. Gift K., Gift T., (2015). Does politics influence hiring? Evidence from a randomized experiment. Political Behavior, 37, 653–675.
19. Gilbert G. T., King G., Pettigrew S., Wilson T. D., (2016). Comment on “Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.” Science, 351, 1037-a.
20. Graham J., Haidt J., Nosek B. A., (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.
21. Haslam N., Bastian B., Bain P., Kashima Y., (2006). Psychological essentialism, implicit theories, and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 63–76.
22. Hayes A. F., (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
23. Hodson G., Dhont K., (2015). The person-based nature of prejudice: Individual difference predictors of intergroup negativity. European Review of Social Psychology, 26, 1–42.
24. Iyengar S., Westwood S. J., (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690–707.
25. Judd C. M., Westfall J., Kenny D. A., (2012). Treating stimuli as a random factor in social psychology: A new and comprehensive solution to a pervasive but largely ignored problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 54–69.
26. Kahan D. M., (2013). Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 407–424.
27. Koch A., Imhoff R., Dotsch R., Unkelbach C., Alves H., (2016). The ABC of stereotypes about groups: Agency/socioeconomic success, conservative-progressive beliefs, and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110, 675–709.
28. Meehl P. E., (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
29. Meehl P. E., (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In Harlow L. L., Mulaik S. A., Steiger J. H., (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 391–423). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Motyl M., Iyer R., Oishi S., Trawalter S., Nosek B. A., (2014). How ideological migration geographically segregates groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 1–14.
31. Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349, aac4716.
32. Schönbrodt F. D., Perugini M., (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize? Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 609–612.
33. Sidanius J., Pratto F., (2001). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
34. Sides J., Gross K., (2013). Stereotypes of Muslims and support for the war on terror. The Journal of Politics, 75, 583–598.
35. Suhay E., Jayaratne T. E., (2013). Does biology justify ideology? The politics of genetic attribution. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77, 497–521.
36. Viechtbauer W., (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of Statistical Software, 36, 1–48.
37. Wetherell G. A., Brandt M. J., Reyna C., (2013). Discrimination across the ideological divide: The role of value violations and abstract values in discrimination by liberals and conservatives. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 658–667.
38. Wynn K., (2016). Origins of value conflict: Babies do not agree to disagree. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 3–5.
39. Yarkoni T., Westfall J., (in press). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives in Psychological Science.