Publish and perish in the hands of predatory journals

Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 787-788

  Cordeiro, Yraima ^a   Lima, Luis Maurício T R ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; STANDARDS;

PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT;

EID: 85020278982     PISSN: 00013765     EISSN: 16782690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/0001-37652017892     Document Type: Editorial

References (10)

1. ANNESLEY T, SCOTT M, BASTIAN H, FONSECA V, IOANNIDIS JP, KELLER MA and POLKA J. 2017. Biomedical Journals and Preprint Services: Friends or Foes? Clin Chem 263: 453-458.
2. BEALL J. 2013. Predatory publishing is just one of the consequences of gold open access. Learn Publ 26: 79-84.
3. BUTLER D. 2013. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature 495: 433-435.
4. CALLAWAY E. and POWELL K. 2016. Biologists urged to hug a preprint. Nature 530: 265.
5. CINTAS P. 2016. Peer review: from recognition to improved practices. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363: fnw115.
6. sted., 896 p.
7. DE MEIS L, VELLOSO A, LANNES D, CARMO MS AND DE MEIS C. 2003. The growing competition in Brazilian science: rites of passage, stress and burnout. Braz J Med Biol Res 36: 1135-1141.
8. SANDERSON K. 2010. Two new journals copy the old. Nature 463: 148.
9. SILVER A. 2017. Controversial website that lists ‘predatory’ publishers shuts down. Nature, 18 January 2017 doi:10.1038/ nature.2017.21328.
10. th, 2017