Guidelines for the treatment of hemorrhoids (short report)

Journal of Visceral Surgery

Volumn 153, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 213-218

  Higuero, T ^a   Abramowitz, L ^a,b   Castinel, A ^a   Fathallah, N ^c   Hemery, P ^a   Laclotte Duhoux, C ^a   Pigot, F ^d   Pillant Le Moult, H ^c   Senejoux A ^e   Siproudhis, L ^f   Staumont, G ^g   Suduca, J M ^g   Vinson Bonnet, B ^h  

^a hôpital Bichat ^*  (France)

^b BICHAT HOSPITAL   (France)

^c SAINT JOSEPH HOSPITAL   (France)

^d Hopital Bagatelle   (France)

^e CHP Saint Gregoire   (France)

^f PONTCHAILLOU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^g Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc   (France)

^h CENTRE HOSPITALIER INTERCOMMUNAL   (France)

Author keywords

Guidelines; Hemorrhoids; Treatment

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; ANTIINFLAMMATORY AGENT; GASTROINTESTINAL AGENT; LAXATIVE;

AMBULATORY SURGERY; COMPLICATION; DIET THERAPY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMAN; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

AMBULATORY SURGICAL PROCEDURES; ANALGESICS; ANTI-INFLAMMATORY AGENTS; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; DIET THERAPY; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; GASTROINTESTINAL AGENTS; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; LAXATIVES; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE;

EID: 85020265281     PISSN: 18787886     EISSN: 18787878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.03.004     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jiang, Z., Tang, W., Cao, J., Double-blind randomized clinical trial in evaluating the efficacy and safety of rectum mucosa protector in the treatment of acute hemorrhoids. Chin J Surg 39 (2001), 53–55.
2. Alonso-Coello, P., Guyatt, G., Heels-Ansdell, D., et al. Laxatives for the treatment of hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 19, 2005, CD004649.
3. Alonso-Coello, P., Mills, E., Heels-Ansdell, D., et al. Fiber for the treatment of hemorrhoids complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 101 (2006), 181–188.
4. Perera, N., Liolitsa, D., Iype, S., et al. Phlebotonics for haemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 15, 2012, CD004322.
5. Abramowitz, L., Godeberge, P., Staumont, G., Soudan, D., for the Société Nationale Française de Colo-Proctologie. Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 25 (2001), 674–702.
6. MacRae, H.M., McLeod, R.S., Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 38 (1995), 687–694.
7. Kanellos, I., Goulimaris, I., Christoforidis, E., Kelpis, T., Betsis, D., A comparison of the simultaneous application of sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation, with sclerotherapy and rubber band ligation applied separately, for the treatment of haemorrhoids: a prospective randomized trial. Colorectal Dis 5 (2003), 133–138.
8. Shanmugam, V., Thaha, M.A., Rabindranath, K.S., Campbell, K.L., Steele, R.J.C., Loudon, M.A., Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 92 (2003), 1481–1487.
9. ShanmugamV, Muthukumarasamy, G., Cook, J.A., Vale, L., Watson, A.J.M., Loudon, M.A., Randomized controlled trial comparing rubber band ligation with stapled haemorrhoidopexy for Grade II circumferential haemorrhoids: long-term results. Colorectal Disease 12 (2010), 579–586.
10. Poon, G.P., Chu, K.W., Lau, W.Y., et al. Conventional vs. triple rubber band ligation for hemorrhoids. A prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 29 (1986), 83683–83688.
11. SFED/HAS, Antiplatelet agents: consideration of thrombotic and hemorrhagic risk of endoscopy in coronary patients (Recommendation of Good Practice in partnership with the French Health Authority, June 2012). 2012 http://www.sfed.org/documents_sfed/files/recommandations/Antiagregplaqendo_rbp.pdf.
12. Ho, Y.H., Buettner, P.G., Open compared with closed haemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol 11 (2007), 135–143.
13. Nisar, P.J., Acheson, A.G., Neal, K.R., Scholefield, J.H., Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 47 (2004), 1837–1845.
14. Lumb, K.J., Colquhoun, P.H., Malthaner, R., Jayaraman, S., Stapled versus conventional surgery for hemorrhoids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, 2006, CD005393.
15. Giordano, P., Gravante, G., Sorge, R., Ovens, L., Nastro, P., Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 144 (2009), 266–272.
16. Pucher, P.H., Sodergren, M.H., Lord, A.C., Darzi, A., Ziprin, P., Clinical outcome following Doppler-guided haemorrhoidal artery ligation: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 15 (2013), 284–294.
17. Avital, S., Inbar, R., Karin, E., Greenberg, R., Five-year follow-up of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Tech Coloproctol 16 (2012), 61–65.
18. Faucheron, J.L., Gangner, Y., Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation and rectoanal repair (HAL-RAR) for the treatment of grade IV hemorrhoids: long-term results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 54 (2011), 226–231.
19. Giordano, P., Nastro, P., Davies, A., Gravante, G., Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15 (2011), 67–73.
20. Bursics, A., Morvay, K., Kupcsulik, P., Flautner, L., Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 19 (2004), 176–180.
21. Sajid, M.S., Parampalli, U., Whitehouse, P., Sains, P., McFall, M.R., Baig, M.K., A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 16 (2012), 1–8.
22. Pigot, F., Juguet, F., Bouchard, D., Castinel, A., Vove, J.P., Prospective survey of secondary bleeding following anorectal surgery in a consecutive series of 1,269 patients. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 35 (2011), 41–47.
23. Mathai, V., Ong, B.C., Ho, Y.H., Randomized controlled trial of lateral internal sphincterotomy with haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 83 (1996), 380–382.
24. Luck, A.J., Hewett, P.J., Ischiorectal fossa block decreases posthemorrhoidectomy pain: randomized, prospective, double-blind clinical trial. Dis Colon Rectum 43 (2000), 142–145.
25. Milito, G., Cadeddu, F., Muzi, M.G., Nigro, C., Farinon, A.M., Haemorrhoidectomy with Ligasure vs conventional excisional techniques: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Colorectal Dis 12 (2010), 85–93.
26. Chung, C.C., Ha, J.P., Tai, Y.P., Tsang, W.W., Li, M.K., Double blind, randomized trial comparing Harmonic Scalpel™ hemorrhoidectomy, bipolar scissors hemorrhoidectomy and scissors excision: ligation technique. Dis Colon Rectum 45 (2002), 789–794.
27. White, P.F., Multimodal analgesia: its role in preventing postoperative pain. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 9 (2008), 76–82.
28. Beattie, G.C., McAdam, T.K., McIntosh, S.A., Loudon, M.A., Day case stapled haemorrhoidopexy for prolapsing haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 8 (2006), 56–61.
29. Cosenza, U.M., Conte, S., Mari, F.S., et al. Stapled anopexy as a day surgery procedure: our experience over 400 cases. Surgeon 11:Suppl. 1 (2013), S10–S13.
30. Ong, C.H., Chee Boon Foo, E., Keng, V., Ambulatory circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under local anaesthesia versus circular stapled haemorrhoidectomy under regional anaesthesia. ANZ J Surg 75 (2005), 184–186.