Walkability as a summary measure in a spatially autoregressive mode choice model: An instrumental variable approach

Advances in Spatial Science

Volumn 63, Issue , 2010, Pages 217-229

  Goetzke, Frank ^a   Andrade, Patrick M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85020235274     PISSN: 14309602     EISSN: 21979375     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03326-1_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (19)

1. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Kluver, Dordrecht
2. Brock WA, Durlauf SN (2001) Discrete choice with social interactions. Rev Econ Stud 66:235-260
3. Brock WA, Durlauf SN (2002) A multinomial-choice model with neighborhood effects. Am Econ Rev 92:298-303
4. Brueckner JK, Largey AG (2006) Social interaction and urban sprawl. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1843, Munich
5. Dugundi ER, Walker JL (2005) Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies. Transp Res Rec 1921:70-78
6. Evans WN, Oates WE, Schwab RM (1992) Measuring peer group effects: a study of teenage behavior. J Polit Econ 100:966-991
7. Fleming MM (2004) Techniques for estimating spatially dependent discrete choice models. In: Anselin L et al. (eds) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 145-168
8. Goetzke F (2003) Are travel demand forecasting models biased because of uncorrected spatial autocorrelation? Regional Research Institute Research Paper 2003-10, West Virginia University, Morgantown
9. Goetzke F (2008) Network effects in public transit use: evidence from a spatially autoregressive mode choice model for New York. Urban Stud 45:407-417
10. Land KC, Deane G (1992) On the large-sample estimation of regression models with spatial or network effects terms: a two-stage least squares approach. Sociol Methodol 22:221-248
11. Leenders RTAJ (2002) Modeling social influence through network autocorrelation: constructing a weight matrix. Soc Networks 24:21-47
12. Manski CF (2000) Economic analysis of social interactions. J Eco Perspect 14:115-136
13. McFadden D (1974) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. In: Zarembka P (ed) Frontiers in econometrics. Academic, New York, pp 105-162
14. NYMTC (2004) New York best practice model (BPM) for regional travel demand forecasting. Technical report, New York
15. Páez A, Scott DM (2007) Social influence on travel behavior: a simulation example of the decision to telecommute. Environ Plann A 39:647-665
16. Páez A, Scott DM, Volz E (2008a) Weight matrices for social influence analysis: an investigation of measurement errors and their effect on model identification and estimation quality. Soc Networks 30:309-317
17. Páez A, Scott DM, Volz E (2008b) A discrete choice approach to modeling social influence on individual decision making. Environ Plann B 35:1055-1069
18. Train K (2003) Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
19. Wooldridge JM (2005) Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. South-Western College Publishing, Florence, KY