Optimal plateau pressure for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis with meta-regression

BMJ Open

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2017, Pages

  Yasuda, Hideto ^a,b   Nishimura, Tetsuro ^c   Kamo, Tetsuro ^b   Sanui, Masamitsu ^d   Nango, Eishu ^e   Abe, Takayuki ^b,f   Takebayashi, Toru ^b   Lefor, Alan Kawarai ^d   Hashimoto, Satoru ^g  

^a KAMEDA MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

^b KEIO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c OSAKA CITY UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^d JICHI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e Tokyo Metropol Kita Med/Rehab C   (Japan)

^f KEIO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^g KYOTO PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

acute respiratory distress syndrome; ARDS; mechanical ventilation; plateau pressure

Indexed keywords

ACUTE LUNG INJURY; ADULT RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DATA SYNTHESIS; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LUNG PRESSURE; META ANALYSIS; PATIENT SELECTION; PLATEAU PRESSURE; RESPIRATORY TRACT PARAMETERS; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STUDY DESIGN; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; METHODOLOGY; MORTALITY; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); TIDAL VOLUME; VENTILATOR INDUCED LUNG INJURY;

HUMANS; PRESSURE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, ADULT; TIDAL VOLUME; VENTILATOR-INDUCED LUNG INJURY;

EID: 85019988097     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015091     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1685-93.
2. Rubenfeld GD, Herridge MS. Epidemiology and outcomes of acute lung injury. Chest 2007;131:554-62.
3. Bersten AD, Edibam C, Hunt T, et al. Incidence and mortality of acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome in three Australian States. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:443-8.
4. Herridge MS, Tansey CM, Matté A, et al. Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011;364:1293-304.
5. Davidson TA, Caldwell ES, Curtis JR, et al. Reduced quality of life in survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome compared with critically ill control patients. JAMA 1999;281:354-60.
6. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2015;372:747-55.
7. Sutherasan Y, Vargas M, Pelosi P. Protective mechanical ventilation in the non-injured lung: review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2014;18:211.
8. Gattinoni L, Pesenti A, Avalli L, et al. Pressure-volume curve of total respiratory system in acute respiratory failure. computed tomographic scan study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;136:730-6.
9. Dreyfuss D, Soler P, Basset G, et al. High inflation pressure pulmonary edema. Respective effects of high airway pressure, high tidal volume, and positive end-expiratory pressure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1988;137:1159-64.
10. Muscedere JG, Mullen JB, Gan K, et al. Tidal ventilation at low airway pressures can augment lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:1327-34.
11. Caironi P, Cressoni M, Chiumello D, et al. Lung opening and closing during ventilation of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:578-86.
12. Ferguson ND, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, et al. High-frequency oscillation in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:795-805.
13. Young D, Lamb SE, Shah S, et al. High-frequency oscillation for acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:806-13.
14. Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301-8.
15. Meade MO, Cook DJ, Guyatt GH, et al. Ventilation strategy using low tidal volumes, recruitment maneuvers, and high positive end-expiratory pressure for acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2008;299:637-45.
16. Kacmarek RM, Villar J, Sulemanji D, et al. Open lung approach for the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a pilot, Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med 2016;44:32-42.
17. Fish E, Novack V, Banner-Goodspeed VM, et al. The esophageal Pressure-Guided ventilation 2 (EPVent2) trial protocol: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial of mechanical ventilation guided by transpulmonary pressure. BMJ Open 2014;4:e006356.
18. Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, et al. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2008;359:2095-104.
19. Villar J, Ambrós A, Soler JA, et al. Age, PaO2/FIO2, and Plateau pressure score: a proposal for a Simple Outcome score in patients with the Acute Respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2016;44:1361-9.
20. Petrucci N, De Feo C. Lung protective ventilation strategy for the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013:CD003844.
21. Claesson J, Freundlich M, Gunnarsson I, et al. Scandinavian clinical practice guideline on mechanical ventilation in adults with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2015;59:286-97.
22. Fuller BM, Mohr NM, Drewry AM, et al. Lower tidal volume at initiation of mechanical ventilation may reduce progression to acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review. Crit Care 2013;17:R11.
23. Burns KE, Adhikari NK, Slutsky AS, et al. Pressure and volume limited ventilation for the ventilatory management of patients with acute lung injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2011;6:e14623.
24. Moran JL, Bersten AD, Solomon PJ. Meta-analysis of controlled trials of ventilator therapy in acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome: an alternative perspective. Intensive Care Med 2005;31:227-35.
25. Brochard L, Roudot-Thoraval F, Roupie E, et al. Tidal volume reduction for prevention of ventilator-induced lung injury in acute respiratory distress syndrome. The Multicenter Trail Group on Tidal Volume reduction in ARDS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1831-8.
26. Brower RG, Shanholtz CB, Fessler HE, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing traditional versus reduced tidal volume ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1492-8.
27. Villar J, Kacmarek RM, Pérez-Méndez L, et al. A high positive endexpiratory pressure, low tidal volume ventilatory strategy improves outcome in persistent acute respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care Med 2006;34:1311-8.
28. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe Sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med 2013;39:165-228.
29. Laffey JG, Bellani G, Pham T, et al. Potentially modifiable factors contributing to outcome from acute respiratory distress syndrome: the LUNG SAFE study. Intensive Care Med 2016;42:1865-76.
30. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;349:g7647.
31. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:818-24.
32. Data collection Form-Intervention review for RCTs only. secondary data collection Form-Intervention review for RCTs only. http://training. cochrane. org/resource/data-collection-forms-interventionreviews. (accessed 7 November 2016).
33. RevMan 5 download and installion. Secondary RevMan 5 download and installion. http://tech. cochrane. org/revman/download (accessed 7 Nov 2016).
34. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. http://training. cochrane. org/handbook. (accessed 7 Nov 2016).
35. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Table 8.5.d: criteria for judging risk of bias in the 'Risk of bias' assessment tool. http://handbook. cochrane. org/chapter- 8/table- 8-5-d-criteria- for- judging- risk- of- bias- in- the- risk- of. htm (accessed 7 Nov 2016).
36. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a metaanalysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-58.
37. Sterne JA, Sutton AJ, Ioannidis JP, et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011;343:d4002.
38. Davey Smith G, Egger M. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1997;350:1182.
39. Rücker G, Schwarzer G, Carpenter J. Arcsine test for publication Bias in meta-analyses with binary outcomes. Stat Med 2008;27:746-63.
40. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Schünemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: a new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:380-2.