Development and validation of a Brief Assessment of Recovery Capital (BARC-10) for alcohol and drug use disorder

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 177, Issue , 2017, Pages 71-76

  Vilsaint, Corrie L ^a   Kelly, John F ^a   Bergman, Brandon G ^a   Groshkova, Teodora ^b   Best, David ^c   White, William ^d  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b EUROPEAN MONITORING CENTRE FOR DRUGS AND DRUG ADDICTION   (Portugal)

^c SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d Chestnut Health Systems   (United States)

Author keywords

Alcohol; Brief scale; Item response theory; Recovery capital; Remission; Substance use disorder

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BRIEF ASSESSMENT OF RECOVERY CAPITAL 10; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REMISSION; SCOTLAND; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY; COPING BEHAVIOR; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PSYCHOLOGICAL RESILIENCE; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMETRY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESILIENCE, PSYCHOLOGICAL; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85019976864     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.022     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bergman, B.G., Kelly, N.W., Hoeppner, B.B., Vilsaint, C.L., Kelly, J.F., Digital recovery management: characterizing participation and perceived benefit among members of a recovery-specific social network site. Psych. Addict. Behav., 2017, 10.1037/adb0000255.
2. Best, D.W., Haslam, C., Staiger, P., Dingle, G., Savic, M., Bathish, R., Mackenzie, J., Beckwith, M., Lubman, D.I., Social networks and recovery (SONAR): characteristics of a longitudinal outcome study in five therapeutic communities in Australia. Int. J. Ther. Comm. 37 (2016), 131–139, 10.1108/TC-04-2016-0012.
3. Birnbaum, A., Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability. Lord, F., Novick, M., (eds.) Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores., 1968, Addison-Wesley, 397-479. Reading MA.
4. Clark, W., Recovery as an Organizing Concept. 2007 (Accessed 2 Septmeber 2017) http://www.williamwhitepapers.com/pr/Interview_With_H._Westley_Clark_MD_JD,_MPH_CAS_FASAM%20Interview.pdf.
5. Davidson, L., White, W., The concept of recovery as an organizing principle for integrating mental health and addiction services. J. Behav. Health Serv. Res. 34 (2007), 1094–3412, 10.1007/s11414-007-9053-7.
6. Department of Health and Human Services, Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. 2003, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, MD.
7. Donovan, D.M., Bigelow, G.E., Brigham, G.S., Carroll, K.M., Cohen, A.J., Gardin, J.G., Hamilton, J.A., Huestis, M.A., Hughes, J.R., Lindbald, R., Marlatt, G.A., Preston, K.L., Selzer, J.A., Somoza, E.C., Wakim, P.G., Wells, E.A., Primary outcome indices in illicit drug dependence treatment research: systematic approach to selection and measurement of drug use end-points in clinical trials. Addiction 107 (2012), 694–708, 10.1111/j. 1360-0443.2011.03473.x.
8. El-Guebaly, N., The meanings of recovery from addiction: evolution and promises. J. Addict. Med. 6 (2012), 1–9, 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31823ae540.
9. Fluss, R., Faraggi, D., Reiser, B., Estimation of the Youden index and its associated cutoff point. Biom. J. 47 (2005), 458–472, 10.1002/bimj.200410135.
10. Frank-Stromborg, M., Instruments For Clinical Health-Care Research. 3rd edition, 2004, Jones and Bartlett, Sudbury.
11. Gagne, C.A., White, W., Anthony, W.A., Recovery: a common vision for the fields of mental health and addictions. Psychiatr. Rehab. J. 32 (2007), 32–37, 10.2975/31.1.2007.32.37.
12. Goetz, C., Coste, J., Lemetayer, F., Rat, A., Montel, S., Recchia, S., Debourverie, M., Pouchot, J., Spitz, E., Guillemin, F., Item reduction based on rigorous methodological guidelines is necessary to maintain validity when shortening composite measurement scales. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 66 (2013), 710–718, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.12.015.
13. Granfield, R., Cloud, W., Coming Clean: Overcoming Addiction Without Treatment. 1999, New York University Press, New York, NY.
14. Groshkova, T., Best, D., White, W., The assessment of recovery capital: properties and psychometrics of a measure of addiction recovery strengths. Drug Alcohol Rev. 32 (2013), 187–194.
15. Institute of Medicine, Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-use Conditions. 2006, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
16. Kelly, J.F., Hoeppner, B., A biaxial formulation of the recovery construct. Addict. Res. Theory 23 (2015), 5–9, 10.3109/16066359.2014.930132.
17. Knopf, A., Definition of recovery is vague, measures elusive, even as taxpayers fund services. Alcohol. Drug Abuse Wkly. 23 (2011), 1–8, 10.1002/adaw.20280.
18. Laudet, A.B., White, W.L., Recovery capital as prospective predictor of sustained recovery, life satisfaction, and stress among former poly-substance users. Subst. Use Misuse 43 (2008), 27–54, 10.1080/10826080701681473.
19. Linacre, J.M., Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J. Appl. Meas. 3 (2002), 85–106.
20. Linacre, J. M. (2017). Winsteps® Rasch measurement computer program. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com Lord, F.M., Applications of Item Response Theory to Practical Testing Problems. 1980, Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ.
21. Masters, G.N., A rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47 (1982), 149–174, 10.1007/BF02296272.
22. McLellan, T.A., Kushner, H., Metzger, D., Peters, R., Smith, I., Grissom, G., Pettinati, H., Argeriou, M., The fifth edition of the addiction severity index. J. Subst. Abuse Treat., 9, 1992 1969–1213.
23. Perkins, N.J., Schisterman, E.F., The inconsistency of Optimal cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curse. Am. J. Epidemiol. 163 (2006), 670–675, 10.1093/aje/kwj063.
24. Rasch, G., Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research. 1960, The University of Chicago Press 1980 [in Danish] Reprinted by Chicago: MESA Press, 1993.
25. Reckase, M.D., Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: results andimplications. J. Edu. Stat. 4 (1979), 207–230, 10.2307/1164671.
26. Samejima, F., Estimation of Latent Ability Using a Response Pattern of Graded Scores(Psychometric Monograph No. 17). 1969, Psychometric Society, Richmond VA Retrieved from http://www.psychometrika.org/journal/online/MN17.pdf.
27. Scott, N.W., Fayers, P.M., Aaronson, N.K., Bottomley, A., de Graeff, A., Groenvold, M., Gundy, C., Koller, M., Peterson, M.A., Sprangers, M.A.G., Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses of health-related quality of life instruments using logistic regression. Health Qual. Life Outcomes, 8, 2010, 2010, 10.1007/s11136-009-9453-7.
28. White, W., Cloud, W., Recovery capital: a primer for addictions professionals. Counselor 9 (2008), 22–27.
29. White, W., Recovery: its history and renaissance as an organizing construct. Alcohol. Treat. Q. 23 (2005), 3–15, 10.1300/J020v23n01_0.
30. Zimowski, M.F., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R.J., Bock, R.D., BILOG-MG: Multiple-group Item Analysis and Test Scoring. 1996, Scientific Software International, Chicago, IL.
31. Zwick, R., A review of ETS differential item functioning assessment procedures: flagging rules, minimum sample size, and criterion refinement ETS. Research Report Series, 2012, 10.1002/j.2333–8504.2012.tb02290.x.