Enzyme reversal to explore the function of yeast E3 ubiquitin-ligases

Traffic

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 465-484

  MacDonald, Chris ^a   Winistorfer, Stanley ^a   Pope, Robert M ^b   Wright, Michael E ^a   Piper, Robert C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

E3 ubiquitin ligase; endosomal trafficking; ER associated degradation (ERAD); lysosome; mass spectrometry; proteasome; ubiquitin; ubiquitination; vacuolar protein sorting

Indexed keywords

DEUBIQUITINASE; FUNGAL ENZYME; HYBRID PROTEIN; LYSOSOME ENZYME; PROTEASOME; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE E3; ESCRT PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE;

ARTICLE; CELL MIGRATION; CHIMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENZYME ACTIVE SITE; ENZYME DEGRADATION; ENZYME STABILITY; FUNCTIONAL PROTEOMICS; HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS 1; LYSOSOME; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UBIQUITINATION; YEAST; CELL MEMBRANE; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM ASSOCIATED DEGRADATION; ENDOSOME; ENZYMOLOGY; GENETICS; GOLGI COMPLEX; METABOLISM; PLASMID; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

CELL MEMBRANE; DEUBIQUITINATING ENZYMES; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM-ASSOCIATED DEGRADATION; ENDOSOMAL SORTING COMPLEXES REQUIRED FOR TRANSPORT; ENDOSOMES; GOLGI APPARATUS; LYSOSOMES; PLASMIDS; PROTEIN TRANSPORT; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; UBIQUITIN; UBIQUITIN-PROTEIN LIGASES; UBIQUITINATION;

EID: 85019972376     PISSN: 13989219     EISSN: 16000854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tra.12485     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev. 2002;82(2):373-428. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00027.2001.
2. Mukhopadhyay D, Riezman H. Proteasome-independent functions of ubiquitin in endocytosis and signaling. Science. 2007;315(5809):201-205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127085.
3. Popovic D, Vucic D, Dikic I. Ubiquitination in disease pathogenesis and treatment. Nat Med. 2014;20(11):1242-1253. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3739.
4. Ravid T, Hochstrasser M. Diversity of degradation signals in the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2008;9(9):679-690. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2468.
5. Piper RC, Dikic I, Lukacs GL. Ubiquitin-dependent sorting in endocytosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2014;6(1):a016808. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a016808.
6. Ruggiano A, Foresti O, Carvalho P. Quality control: ER-associated degradation: protein quality control and beyond. J Cell Biol. 2014;204(6):869-879. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201312042.
7. Komander D, Rape M. The ubiquitin code. Annu Rev Biochem. 2012;81:203-229. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060310-170328.
8. Deshaies RJ, Joazeiro CAP. RING domain E3 ubiquitin ligases. Annu Rev Biochem. 2009;78:399-434. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.78.101807.093809.
9. Li W, Bengtson MH, Ulbrich A, et al. Genome-wide and functional annotation of human E3 ubiquitin ligases identifies MULAN, a mitochondrial E3 that regulates the organelle's dynamics and signaling. PLoS One. 2008;3(1):e1487. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0001487.
10. Katzmann DJ, Wendland B. Analysis of ubiquitin-dependent protein sorting within the endocytic pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Ubiquitin and Protein Degradation, Part B. Vol 399. Elsevier; 2005:192-211. Methods in Enzymology. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(05)99013-7.
11. Huibregtse JM, Scheffner M, Beaudenon S, Howley PM. A family of proteins structurally and functionally related to the E6-AP ubiquitin-protein ligase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92(7):2563-2567.
12. Tardiff DF, Jui NT, Khurana V, et al. Yeast reveal a “druggable” Rsp5/Nedd4 network that ameliorates α-synuclein toxicity in neurons. Science. 2013;342(6161):979-983. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245321.
13. Kamadurai HB, Souphron J, Scott DC, et al. Insights into ubiquitin transfer cascades from a structure of a UbcH5B ∼ ubiquitin-HECTNEDD4L complex. Mol Cell. 2009;36(6):1095-1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.11.010.
14. Kamadurai HB, Qiu Y, Deng A, et al. Mechanism of ubiquitin ligation and lysine prioritization by a HECT E3. ELife. 2013;2:e00828. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00828.
15. Kus B, Gajadhar A, Stanger K, et al. A high throughput screen to identify substrates for the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(33):29470-29478. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M502197200.
16. Gupta R, Kus B, Fladd C, et al. Ubiquitination screen using protein microarrays for comprehensive identification of Rsp5 substrates in yeast. Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3. https://doi.org/10.1038/msb4100159.
17. Lee W-C, Lee M, Jung JW, Kim KP, Kim D. SCUD: Saccharomyces cerevisiae ubiquitination database. BMC Genomics. 2008;9:440. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-440.
18. Vandenbol M, Jauniaux JC, Vissers S, Grenson M. Isolation of the NPR1 gene responsible for the reactivation of ammonia-sensitive amino-acid permeases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. RNA analysis and gene dosage effects. Eur J Biochem. 1987;164(3):607-612.
19. Hein C, Springael JY, Volland C, Haguenauer-Tsapis R, Andre B. NPl1, an essential yeast gene involved in induced degradation of Gap1 and Fur4 permeases, encodes the Rsp5 ubiquitin-protein ligase. Mol Microbiol. 1995;18(1):77-87.
20. Fang NN, Chan GT, Zhu M, et al. Rsp5/Nedd4 is the main ubiquitin ligase that targets cytosolic misfolded proteins following heat stress. Nat Cell Biol. 2014;16(12):1227-1237. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3054.
21. Chellappa R, Kandasamy P, Oh CS, Jiang Y, Vemula M, Martin CE. The membrane proteins, Spt23p and Mga2p, play distinct roles in the activation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae OLE1 gene expression. Fatty acid-mediated regulation of Mga2p activity is independent of its proteolytic processing into a soluble transcription activator. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(47):43548-43556. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M107845200.
22. Kee Y, Muñoz W, Lyon N, Huibregtse JM. The deubiquitinating enzyme Ubp2 modulates Rsp5-dependent Lys63-linked polyubiquitin conjugates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(48):36724-36731. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M608756200.
23. MacDonald C, Stringer DK, Piper RC. Sna3 is an Rsp5 adaptor protein that relies on ubiquitination for its MVB sorting. Traffic. 2012;13(4):586-598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01326.x.
24. Stringer DK, Piper RC. A single ubiquitin is sufficient for cargo protein entry into MVBs in the absence of ESCRT ubiquitination. J Cell Biol. 2011;192(2):229-242. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201008121.
25. Dürr M, Escobar-Henriques M, Merz S, Geimer S, Langer T, Westermann B. Nonredundant roles of mitochondria-associated F-box proteins Mfb1 and Mdm30 in maintenance of mitochondrial morphology in yeast. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17(9):3745-3755. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-01-0053.
26. Oestreich AJ, Aboian M, Lee J, et al. Characterization of multiple multivesicular body sorting determinants within Sna3: a role for the ubiquitin ligase Rsp5. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18(2):707-720. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E06-08-0680.
27. MacDonald C, Payne JA, Aboian M, Smith W, Katzmann DJ, Piper RC. A family of tetraspans organizes cargo for sorting into multivesicular bodies. Dev Cell. 2015;33(3):328-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.007.
28. Gardner RG, Swarbrick GM, Bays NW, et al. Endoplasmic reticulum degradation requires lumen to cytosol signaling. Transmembrane control of Hrd1p by Hrd3p. J Cell Biol. 2000;151(1):69-82.
29. Bays NW, Gardner RG, Seelig LP, Joazeiro CA, Hampton RY. Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat Cell Biol. 2001;3(1):24-29. https://doi.org/10.1038/35050524.
30. Wolf DH, Fink GR. Proteinase C (carboxypeptidase Y) mutant of yeast. J Bacteriol. 1975;123(3):1150-1156.
31. Gardner RG, Hampton RY. A “distributed degron” allows regulated entry into the ER degradation pathway. EMBO J. 1999;18(21):5994-6004. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/18.21.5994.
32. Li FN, Johnston M. Grr1 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is connected to the ubiquitin proteolysis machinery through Skp1: coupling glucose sensing to gene expression and the cell cycle. EMBO J. 1997;16(18):5629-5638. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.18.5629.
33. Schwob E, Böhm T, Mendenhall MD, Nasmyth K. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1994;79(2):233-244.
34. Verma R, Annan RS, Huddleston MJ, Carr SA, Reynard G, Deshaies RJ. Phosphorylation of Sic1p by G1 Cdk required for its degradation and entry into S phase. Science. 1997;278(5337):455-460.
35. Raymond CK, Howald-Stevenson I, Vater CA, Stevens TH. Morphological classification of the yeast vacuolar protein sorting mutants: evidence for a prevacuolar compartment in class E vps mutants. Mol Biol Cell. 1992;3(12):1389-1402.
36. Abe F, Iida H. Pressure-induced differential regulation of the two tryptophan permeases Tat1 and Tat2 by ubiquitin ligase Rsp5 and its binding proteins, Bul1 and Bul2. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23(21):7566-7584.
37. Tong Z, Kim M-S, Pandey A, Espenshade PJ. Identification of candidate substrates for the golgi Tul1 E3 ligase using quantitative diGly proteomics in yeast. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13(11):2871-2882. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M114.040774.
38. Reggiori F, Pelham HRB. A transmembrane ubiquitin ligase required to sort membrane proteins into multivesicular bodies. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4(2):117-123. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb743.
39. Taubas JV, Pelham H. Swf1-dependent palmitoylation of the SNARE Tlg1 prevents its ubiquitination and degradation. EMBO J. 2005;24(14):2524-2532. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600724.
40. Shin ME, Ogburn KD, Varban OA, Gilbert PM, Burd CG. FYVE domain targets Pib1p ubiquitin ligase to endosome and vacuolar membranes. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(44):41388-41393. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M105665200.
41. Bonangelino CJ, Chavez EM, Bonifacino JS. Genomic screen for vacuolar protein sorting genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(7):2486-2501. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.02-01-0005.
42. Bilodeau PS, Urbanowski JL, Winistorfer SC, Piper RC. The Vps27p–Hse1p complex binds ubiquitin and mediates endosomal protein sorting. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4(7):534-539. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb815.
43. MacDonald C, Buchkovich NJ, Stringer DK, Emr SD, Piper RC. Cargo ubiquitination is essential for multivesicular body intralumenal vesicle formation. EMBO Rep. 2012;13(4):331-338. https://doi.org/10.1038/embor.2012.18.
44. Balderhaar HJK, Ungermann C. CORVET and HOPS tethering complexes – coordinators of endosome and lysosome fusion. J Cell Sci. 2013;126(pt 6):1307-1316. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.107805.
45. Kushnirov VV. Rapid and reliable protein extraction from yeast. Yeast. 2000;16(9):857-860. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0061(20000630)16:9<857::AID-YEA561>3.0.CO;2-B.
46. Wiśniewski JR, Zougman A, Nagaraj N, Mann M. Universal sample preparation method for proteome analysis. Nat Methods. 2009;6(5):359-362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1322.
47. Peng J, Schwartz D, Elias JE, et al. A proteomics approach to understanding protein ubiquitination. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(8):921-926. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt849.
48. Nevoigt E, Kohnke J, Fischer CR, Alper H, Stahl U, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering of promoter replacement cassettes for fine-tuning of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(8):5266-5273. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00530-06.
49. Dittmar GAG, Wilkinson CRM, Jedrzejewski PT, Finley D. Role of a ubiquitin-like modification in polarized morphogenesis. Science. 2002;295(5564):2442-2446. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1069989.
50. Fang NN, Ng AHM, Measday V, Mayor T. Hul5 HECT ubiquitin ligase plays a major role in the ubiquitylation and turnover of cytosolic misfolded proteins. Nat Cell Biol. 2011;13(11):1344-1352. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2343.
51. Hsiao JJ, Smits MM, Ng BH, Lee J, Wright ME. Discovery proteomics identifies a molecular link between the coatomer protein complex I and androgen receptor-dependent transcription. J Biol Chem. 2016;291(36):18818-18842. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M116.732313.
52. Xu P, Duong DM, Seyfried NT, et al. Quantitative proteomics reveals the function of unconventional ubiquitin chains in proteasomal degradation. Cell. 2009;137(1):133-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.041.
53. Horazdovsky BF, Cowles CR, Mustol P, Holmes M, Emr SD. A novel RING finger protein, Vps8p, functionally interacts with the small GTPase, Vps21p, to facilitate soluble vacuolar protein localization. J Biol Chem. 1996;271(52):33607-33615.
54. Yu CL, Summers RM, Li Y, Mohanty SK, Subramanian M, Pope RM. Rapid identification and quantitative validation of a caffeine-degrading pathway in Pseudomonas sp. CES. J Proteome Res. 2015;14(1):95-106. https://doi.org/10.1021/pr500751w.
55. Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(12):1367-1372. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.1511.
56. Schmidt A, Hall MN, Koller A. Two FK506 resistance-conferring genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, TAT1 and TAT2, encode amino acid permeases mediating tyrosine and tryptophan uptake. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14(10):6597-6606. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.14.10.6597.
57. Vickers MF, Yao SY, Baldwin SA, Young JD, Cass CE. Nucleoside transporter proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Demonstration of a transporter (FUI1) with high uridine selectivity in plasma membranes and a transporter (FUN26) with broad nucleoside selectivity in intracellular membranes. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(34):25931-25938. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M000239200.
58. Rouillon A, Surdin-Kerjan Y, Thomas D. Transport of sulfonium compounds. Characterization of the s-adenosylmethionine and s-methylmethionine permeases from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 1999;274(40):28096-28105.
59. Hauser M, Donhardt AM, Barnes D, Naider F, Becker JM. Enkephalins are transported by a novel eukaryotic peptide uptake system. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(5):3037-3041.
60. Karst F, Lacroute F. Ertosterol biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: mutants deficient in the early steps of the pathway. Mol Gen Genet. 1977;154(3):269-277.
61. Kornmann B, Currie E, Collins SR, et al. An ER-mitochondria tethering complex revealed by a synthetic biology screen. Science. 2009;325(5939):477-481. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1175088.