BETWEEN RECOGNITION AND SYNTHESIS - 300 BITS/SECOND SPEECH CODING

5th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 1997

Volumn , Issue , 1997, Pages 441-444

  Ismail, M ^a   Ponting, K ^a  

^a DEFENCE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); SPEECH CODING; SPEECH COMMUNICATION; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH SYNTHESIS;

CONTINUOUS SPEECH; DEPENDENT TASKS; ERROR RATE; HIDDEN-MARKOV MODELS; PROSODICS; RULES BASED SYSTEMS; SERIAL DATA STREAM; SPEAKER DEPENDENTS; SPEECH SYNTHESIZER; SUBWORD UNITS;

HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS;

EID: 85019614085     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. J Picone, G R Doddington, “A Phonetic Vocoder”, Proc. IEEE ICASSP 89 Vol 1, pp. 580-583, 1989.
2. V W Zue, “Very Low Data Rate Communication”, Technical Report, RADC-TR-84-200, Rome Air Development Center, October 1984.
3. F K Soong, “A Phonetically Labeled Acoustic Segment (PLAS) Approach to Speech Analysis-Synthesis”, Proc. IEEE ICASSP 89 Vol 1, pp. 584-587, 1989.
4. K K Paliwal, P V S Rao, “Synthesis-based recognition of continuous speech”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71(4), pp. 1016-1024, 1982.
5. R E Donovan, P C Woodland, “Improvements in an HMM-Based Speech Synthesiser”, EUROSPEECH 95 Proc. Vol 1, pp. 573-576, 1995.
6. T Masuko, K Tokuda, T Kobayashi, S Imai, “Voice Characteristics Conversion for HMM-Based Speech Synthesis”, ICASSP 97 Proc. Vol III, pp. 1611-1614, 1997.
7. J N Holmes, I G Mattingly, J N Shearme, “Speech Synthesis By Rule”, Language and Speech, Vol 7, pp. 127-143, 1964.
8. S R Browning, J McQuillan, M J Russell, M J Tomlinson, “Texts of Material Recorded in the SI89 Speech Corpus”, RSRE Research Note No. 142, February 1991.
9. A M Noll, “Cepstrum Pitch Determination”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, pp 296-309, 1964.