Outcomes in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Bicuspid Versus Tricuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 69, Issue 21, 2017, Pages 2579-2589

  Yoon, Sung Han ^a   Bleiziffer, Sabine ^b   De Backer, Ole ^c   Delgado, Victoria ^d   Arai, Takahide ^e   Ziegelmueller, Johannes ^b   Barbanti, Marco ^f   Sharma, Rahul ^a   Perlman, Gidon Y ^g   Khalique, Omar K ^h   Holy, Erik W ⁱ   Saraf, Smriti ^j   Deuschl, Florian ^k   Fujita, Buntaro ^l   Ruile, Philipp ^m   Neumann, Franz Josef ⁿ   Pache, Gregor ⁿ   Takahashi, Masao ^o   Kaneko, Hidehiro ^p   Schmidt, Tobias ^q   Ohno, Yohei ^g   Schofer, Niklas ^k   Kong, William K F ^d,r   Tay, Edgar ^r   Sugiyama, Daisuke ^s   Kawamori, Hiroyuki ^a   Maeno, Yoshio ^a   Abramowitz, Yigal ^a   Chakravarty, Tarun ^a   Nakamura, Mamoo ^a   Kuwata, Shingo ^t   Yong, Gerald ^u   Kao, Hsien Li ^v   Lee, Michael ^w   Kim, Hyo Soo ^x   Modine, Thomas ^y   Wong, S Chiu ^h   Bedgoni, Francesco ^z   Testa, Luca ^z   Teiger, Emmanuel ^o   Butter, Christian ^p   Ensminger, Stephan M ^l   Schaefer, Ulrich ^k   Dvir, Danny ^g   Blanke, Philipp ^g   Leipsic, Jonathon ^g   Nietlispach, Fabian ^t   Abdel Wahab, Mohamed ⁱ   Chevalier, Bernard ^e   Tamburino, Corrado ^f   Hildick Smith, David ^j   Whisenant, Brian K ^aa   Park, Seung Jung ^ab   Colombo, Antonio ^ac   Latib, Azeem ^ac   Kodali, Susheel K ^h   Bax, Jeroen J ^d   Søndergaard, Lars ^c   Webb, John G ^e   Lefèvre, Thierry ^e   Leon, Martin B ^h   Makkar, Raj ^a   more..

^a CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c University of Copenhagen   (Denmark)

^d LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e INSTITUT CARDIOVASCULAIRE PARIS SUD   (France)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CATANIA   (Italy)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^h NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^j Worthing Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^k UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER HAMBURG   (Germany)

^l RUHR UNIVERSITY BOCHUM   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY HEART CENTER FREIBURG BAD KROZINGEN   (Germany)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^o HENRI MONDOR HOSPITAL   (France)

^p Heart Centre Brandenburg   (Germany)

^q DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Germany)

^r NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM   (Singapore)

^s KEIO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^t UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^u ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^v NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^w QUEEN ELIZABETH HOSPITAL   (Hong Kong)

^x Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^y LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^z IRCCS POLICLINICO SAN DONATO   (Italy)

^aa Intermountain Heart Institute   (United States)

^ab University of Ulsan   (South Korea)

^ac SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

more..

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; bicuspid aortic valve; transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTIC ROOT; AORTIC ROOT INJURY; AORTIC TRAUMA; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BICUSPID AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY RATE; PARAVALVULAR LEAK; PERCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; PROPENSITY SCORE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TRICUSPID AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ABNORMALITIES; AORTIC VALVE; CLINICAL TRIAL; GLOBAL HEALTH; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS; TRICUSPID VALVE;

AGED; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; FEMALE; GLOBAL HEALTH; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRICUSPID VALVE;

EID: 85019572682     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Leon, M.B., Smith, C.R., Mack, M., et al., for the PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 363 (2010), 1597–1607.
2. Smith, C.R., Leon, M.B., Mack, M.J., et al., for the PARTNER Trial Investigators. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 364 (2011), 2187–2198.
3. Gilard, M., Eltchaninoff, H., Iung, B., et al., for the FRANCE 2 Investigators. Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 366 (2012), 1705–1715.
4. Reinöhl, J., Kaier, K., Reinecke, H., et al. Effect of availability of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement on clinical practice. N Engl J Med 373 (2015), 2438–2447.
5. Adams, D.H., Popma, J.J., Reardon, M.J., et al., for the U.S. CoreValve Clinical Investigators. Transcatheter aortic-valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis. N Engl J Med 370 (2014), 1790–1798.
6. Leon, M.B., Smith, C.R., Mack, M.J., et al., for the PARTNER 2 Investigators. Transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients. N Engl J Med 374 (2016), 1609–1620.
7. Thyregod, H.G., Steinbrüchel, D.A., Ihlemann, N., et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis: 1-year results from the all-comers NOTION randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 65 (2015), 2184–2194.
8. Mylotte, D., Lefevre, T., Søndergaard, L., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 64 (2014), 2330–2339.
9. Perlman, G.Y., Blanke, P., Dvir, D., et al. Bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: favorable early outcomes with a next-generation transcatheter heart valve in a multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 9 (2016), 817–824.
10. Yoon, S.H., Lefèvre, T., Ahn, J.M., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early- and new-generation devices in bicuspid aortic valve stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 68 (2016), 1195–1205.
11. Yousef, A., Simard, T., Webb, J., et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: a patient level multi-center analysis. Int J Cardiol 189 (2015), 282–288.
12. Jilaihawi, H., Chen, M., Webb, J., et al. A bicuspid aortic valve imaging classification for the TAVR era. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 9 (2016), 1145–1158.
13. Mack, M.J., Brennan, J.M., Brindis, R., et al., for the STS/ACC TVT Registry. Outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the United States. JAMA 310 (2013), 2069–2077.
14. Yoon, S.H., Ahn, J.M., Hayashida, K., et al., for the Asian TAVR Investigators. Clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in Asian population. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 9 (2016), 926–933.
15. Sievers, H.H., Schmidtke, C., A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133 (2007), 1226–1233.
16. Sabet, H.Y., Edwards, W.D., Tazelaar, H.D., Daly, R.C., Congenitally bicuspid aortic valves: a surgical pathology study of 542 cases (1991 through 1996) and a literature review of 2,715 additional cases. Mayo Clin Proc 74 (1999), 14–26.
17. Cribier, A., Eltchaninoff, H., Tron, C., et al. Treatment of calcific aortic stenosis with the percutaneous heart valve: mid-term follow-up from the initial feasibility studies: the French experience. J Am Coll Cardiol 47 (2006), 1214–1223.
18. Webb, J.G., Pasupati, S., Humphries, K., et al. Percutaneous transarterial aortic valve replacement in selected high-risk patients with aortic stenosis. Circulation 116 (2007), 755–763.
19. Ye, J., Cheung, A., Lichtenstein, S.V., et al. Transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation: 1-year outcome in 26 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137 (2009), 167–173.
20. Grube, E., Laborde, J.C., Gerckens, U., et al. Percutaneous implantation of the CoreValve self-expanding valve prosthesis in high-risk patients with aortic valve disease: the Siegburg first-in-man study. Circulation 114 (2006), 1616–1624.
21. Etienne, P.Y., Papadatos, S., El Khoury, E., Pieters, D., Price, J., Glineur, D., Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN valve: feasibility, technical considerations, and clinical advantages. Ann Thorac Surg 92 (2011), 746–748.
22. Bruschi, G., de Marco, F., Botta, L., et al. Direct aortic access for transcatheter self-expanding aortic bioprosthetic valves implantation. Ann Thorac Surg 94 (2012), 497–503.
23. Kappetein, A.P., Head, S.J., Généreux, P., et al. Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 1438–1454.
24. Pocock, S.J., Ariti, C.A., Collier, T.J., Wang, D., The win ratio: a new approach to the analysis of composite endpoints in clinical trials based on clinical priorities. Eur Heart J 33 (2012), 176–182.
25. The R Project for Statistical Computing. R version 2.12.2. Available at: https://www.r-project.org. Accessed March 28, 2017.
26. Kodali, S., Pibarot, P., Douglas, P.S., et al. Paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Edwards Sapien valve in the PARTNER trial: characterizing patients and impact on outcomes. Eur Heart J 36 (2015), 449–456.
27. Abdel-Wahab, M., Comberg, T., Buttner, H.J., et al., for the Segeberg-Krozingen TAVI Registry. Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with balloon- and self-expandable prostheses: a pooled analysis from a 2-center experience. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 7 (2014), 284–292.
28. Généreux, P., Webb, J.G., Svensson, L.G., et al., for the PARTNER Trial Investigators. Vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: insights from the PARTNER (Placement of AoRTic TraNscathetER Valve) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 1043–1052.
29. Athappan, G., Patvardhan, E., Tuzcu, E.M., et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: meta-analysis and systematic review of literature. J Am Coll Cardiol 61 (2013), 1585–1595.
30. Sievers, H.H., Stierle, U., Mohamed, S.A., et al. Toward individualized management of the ascending aorta in bicuspid aortic valve surgery: the role of valve phenotype in 1362 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 (2014), 2072–2080.
31. Michelena, H.I., Khanna, A.D., Mahoney, D., et al. Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. JAMA 306 (2011), 1104–1112.
32. Roman, M.J., Devereux, R.B., Kramer-Fox, R., O'Loughlin, J., Two-dimensional echocardiographic aortic root dimensions in normal children and adults. Am J Cardiol 64 (1989), 507–512.
33. Hiratzka, L.F., Creager, M.A., Isselbacher, E.M., et al. Surgery for aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a statement of clarification from the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 67 (2016), 724–731.