Heritage as sector, factor and vector: conceptualizing the shifting relationship between heritage management and spatial planning

European Planning Studies

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 1654-1672

  Janssen, Joks ^a   Luiten, Eric ^b,c   Renes, Hans ^d,e   Stegmeijer, Eva ^f  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment   (Netherlands)

^d VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^f Cultural Heritage Agency   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

conservation; Heritage management; spatial planning; the Netherlands

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; HERITAGE CONSERVATION; NATIONAL PLANNING; SPATIAL PLANNING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 85019559219     PISSN: 09654313     EISSN: 14695944     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2017.1329410     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Ashworth, G., (2011). Preservation, conservation and heritage:Approaches to the past in the present through the built environment. Asian Anthropology, 10(1), 1–18. doi:10.1080/1683478X.2011.10552601
2. Ashworth, G., & Howard, P., (1999). European heritage planning and management. Exeter:Intellect Books.
3. Asselbergs, F., (2008). De oude kaart van Nederland. Leegstand en herbestemming. Den Haag:College voor Rijksadviseurs.
4. Baarveld, M., Smit, M., & Hoogerbrugge, M., (2014). Bouwen aan herbestemming van Cultureel Erfgoed. Den Haag:Platform31.
5. Bandarin, F., & van Oers, R., (2012). The historic urban landscape. Managing heritage in an urban century. West Sussex:Wiley Blackwell.
6. Bloemers, T., Kars, H., van der Valk, A., & Wijnen, M., (2010). The cultural landscape & heritage paradox; protection and development of the Dutch archaeological–historical landscape and its European dimension. Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press.
7. Blok, S., (2013). Brief van de Minister voor Wonen en Rijksdienst; Beleidskader voor de Monumenten met Erfgoedfunctie van de Rijksgebouwendienst. Den Haag:Tweede Kamer.
8. Blom, A., Vermaat, S., & De Vries, B., (2017). Post-War Reconstruction in the Netherlands 1945–1965. The Future of a Bright and Brutal Heritage. Rotterdam:NAi010 Publishers.
9. Bosma, K., (2010). Heritage policy in spatial planning. In J. H. F., Bloemers, H., Kars, A., van der Valk, & M., Wijnen (Eds.), The cultural landscape & heritage paradox:Protection and development of the Dutch archaeological–historical landscape and its European dimension (pp. 641–652). Amsterdam:Amsterdam University press.
10. Buitelaar, E., & Bregman, A., (2016). Dutch land development institutions in the face of crisis:Trembling pillars in the planners’ paradise. European Planning Studies, 24(7), 1281–1294. doi:10.1080/09654313.2016.1168785
11. Choay, F., (1999). The invention of the historic monument. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
12. Corten, J. P., Geurts, E., Meurs, P., & Vermeulen, R., (2014). Heritage as an asset for inner-city development. Rotterdam:NAi010.
13. Crimson. (1997). Re-urb. Nieuwe plannen voor oude steden. Rotterdam:Uitgeverij 010.
14. Denhez, M. C., (1997). The heritage strategy planning handbook. Oxford:Dundrum Press.
15. Fairclough, G., (2008). New heritage, an introductory essay–people, landscape and change. In G., Fairclough, R., Harrison, J., Shofield, & J. H., Jameson (Eds.), The heritage reader (pp. 297–312). Abingdon:Routledge.
16. Fairclough, G., & Rippon, S., (2002). Europe’s landscape:Archeologists and the management of change (EAC, Occasional Paper 2). Brussels:EAC.
17. Gelinck, S., & Strolenberg, F., (2014). Rekenen op herbestemming. Idee, aanpak en cijfers van 25 + 1 gerealiseerde projecten. Rotterdam:NAi010.
18. Glendenning, M., (2013). The conservation movement. A history of architectural preservation. London:Routledge.
19. Grijzenhout, F., (2007). Erfgoed:de geschiedenis van een begrip. Amsterdam:Amsterdam University Press.
20. Harrison, R., (2013). Heritage, critical approaches. London:Routledge.
21. Hupperetz, W., (2008). Monumenten stemmen. Visies op de modernisering van de monumentenzorg. Amsterdam:Erfgoed Nederland.
22. Janssen, J., Luiten, E., Renes, H., & Rouwendal, J., (2014). Heritage planning and spatial development in the Netherlands:changing policies and perspectives. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 20(1), 1–21. doi:10.1080/13527258.2012.710852
23. Kalman, H., (2014). Heritage planning:Principles and process. London:Routledge.
24. Kloosterman, R. C., & van der Werf, M., (2009). Culture:A local anchor in a world of flows? Spatial planning and the role of cultural spatial planning in the Netherlands. In P., Benneworth & G. J., Hospers (Eds.), The role of culture in the economic development of old industrial regions (pp. 45–66). Wien:LIT.
25. Kolen, J., (2005). De biografie van het landschap. Drie essays over landschap:Geschiedenis en erfgoed. Amsterdam:Vrije Universiteit.
26. Kolen, J., (2007). Het historisch weefsel. Over de transformatie van de regio en de omgang met het verleden in de 21ste eeuw. In J., Rodermond (Eds.), Perspectief. Maakbare geschiedenis (pp. 46–77). Rotterdam:Stimuleringsfonds voor Architectuur.
27. Kolen, J., Renes, J., & Hermans, R., (2015). Biographies of landscape:Geographical, historical and archaeological perspectives on the production and transmission of landscapes. Amsterdam:AUP (Landscape & Heritage Series).
28. Kuipers, M., (2012). Culturele grondslagen van de Monumentenwet. KNOB Bulletin, 1, 10–25.
29. Labadi, S., & Logan, W., (2016). Approaches to urban heritage, development and sustainability. In S., Labadi & W., Logan (Eds.), Urban heritage, development and sustainability (pp. 1–20). London:Routledge.
30. Labuhn, B., & Luiten, E., (2014). Ontwerpen met erfgoed. Leren van de Belvedere-ervaring. Blauwdruk Publishers, Wageningen–Delft University of Technology (internal publication).
31. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K., (2010). Explaining institutional change. Ambiguity, agency and power. New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
32. March, J. C., & Olsen, J. P., (1989). Rediscovering institutions:The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY:Free Press.
33. Meurs, P., (2016). Heritage-based design. Delft:TU Delft.
34. Ministerie van OCW. (1999). Belvedere. Beleidsnota over de relatie tussen cultuurhistorie en ruimtelijke inrichting. Den Haag:Author.
35. Ministerie van OCW. (2009). Beleidsbrief Modernisering Monumentenzorg. Den Haag:Author.
36. Ministerie van OCW. (2011). Kiezen voor Karakter. Visie erfgoed en ruimte. Den Haag:Author.
37. Nijhof, P., (1989). Het industrieel erfgoed en de kunst van het vernietigen. Zeist:Rijksdienst voor de Monumentenzorg.
38. Pendlebury, J., (2009). Conservation in the age of consensus. New York, NY:Routledge.
39. Pickard, R., (2002a). European cultural heritage. Vol. 2, a review of policies and practice. Strasbourg:Council of Europe Publishing.
40. Pickard, R., (2002b). Area-based protection mechanisms for heritage conservation:A European comparison. Journal of Architectural Conservation, 8(2), 69–88. doi:10.1080/13556207.2002.10785320
41. Priemus, H., (2002). Public-private partnerships for spatio-economic investments:A changing spatial planning approach in the Netherlands. Planning Practice and Research, 17(2), 197–203. doi:10.1080/02697450220145940
42. Prins, L., Habets, A. C., & Timmer, P. J., (2014). Bekende gezichten, gemengde gevoelens. Beschermde stads- en dorpsgezichten in historisch perspectief. Amersfoort:Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed.
43. Provoost, M., & Vanstiphout, W., (2007). WIMBY! Hoogvliet. Toekomst, verleden en heden van een new town! Rotterdam:NAi.
44. Rijksdienst voor het Cultureel Erfgoed. (2016). Handreiking Energie, erfgoed en ruimte. Amersfoort:Author.
45. Smith, J., (2015). Applying a cultural landscape approach to the urban context. In K., Taylor, A., St. Clair, & N., Mitchell (Eds.), Conservering cultural landscapes. Challenges and new directions (pp. 182–197). New York, NY:Routledge.
46. Sorensen, A., (2015). Taking path dependence seriously:A historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 17–38. doi:10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
47. Taylor, Z., (2013). Rethinking planning culture:A new institutionalist approach. Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683–702. doi:10.3828/tpr.2013.36
48. Thompson, S., (2012). Introduction. In S., Thomposon & P., Maginn (Eds.), Planning Australia. An overview of urban and regional planning (pp. 1–14). Sydney:Cambridge University Press.
49. Van der Cammen, H., & De Klerk, L., (2012). The selfmade land:Culture and evolution of urban and regional planning in the Netherlands. Houten:Spectrum.
50. Van der Steen, M., Scherpenisse, J., & van Twist, M., (2015). Sedimentatie in sturing. Systeem brengen in netwerkend werken door meervoudig organiseren. Den Haag:NSOB.
51. Van der Valk, A., (2014). Preservation and development:The cultural landscape and heritage paradox in the Netherlands. Landscape Research, 39(2), 158–173. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.761680
52. Vecco, M., (2010). A definition of cultural heritage:From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 11(3), 321–324. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2010.01.006
53. Veldpaus, L., Pereira Roders, A. R., & Colenbrander, B., (2013). Urban heritage:Putting the past into the future. The Historic Environment:Policy & Practice, 4(1), 3–18. doi:10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000022