Instantaneous wave-free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide PCI

New England Journal of Medicine

Volumn 376, Issue 19, 2017, Pages 1813-1823

  Gotberg M ^a   Christiansen, E H ⁿ   Gudmundsdottir, I J ^o   Sandhall, L ^b   Danielewicz, M ^c   Jakobsen, L ⁿ   Olsson, S E ^b   Ohagen P ^d   Olsson, H ^c   Omerovic, E ^e   Calais, F ^f   Lindroos, P ^g   Maeng, M ⁿ   Todt T ^a   Venetsanos, D ⁱ   James, S K ^d   Karegren, A ^j   Nilsson, M ^a   Carlsson, J ^k   Hauer, D ⁱ   Jensen, J ^g,h,l   Karlsson, A C ^m   Panayi, G ⁱ   Erlinge, D ^a   Frobert O ^f   more..

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b HELSINGBORG HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c Karlstad Hospital   (Sweden)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^f Örebro University   (Sweden)

^g ST GÖRAN S HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^h KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

ⁱ LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^j Västmanland s Hospital Västerås   (Sweden)

^k LINNAEUS UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^l SUNDSVALL HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^m HALMSTAD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

ⁿ AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^o REYKJAVIK UNIVERSITY   (Iceland)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ARTICLE; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEMODYNAMIC PARAMETERS; HUMAN; INSTANTANEOUS WAVE FREE RATIO; MAJOR ADVERSE CARDIAC EVENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; THORAX PAIN; ANGINA PECTORIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FOLLOW UP; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RETREATMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; AGED; ANGINA PECTORIS; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRACTIONAL FLOW RESERVE, MYOCARDIAL; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RETREATMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 85019438253     PISSN: 00284793     EISSN: 15334406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1616540     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bech GJ, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, et al. Fractional flow reserve to determine the appropriateness of angioplasty in moderate coronary stenosis: A randomized trial. Circulation 2001; 103: 2928-34.
2. Tonino PAL, De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 213-24.
3. De Bruyne B, Pijls NHJ, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 991-1001.
4. Sen S, Asrress KN, Nijjer S, et al. Diagnostic classification of the instantaneous wave-free ratio is equivalent to fractional flow reserve and is not improved with adenosine administration: results of CLARIFY (Classification Accuracy of Pressure-Only Ratios Against Indices Using Flow Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1409-20.
5. Petraco R, van de Hoef TP, Nijjer S, et al. Baseline instantaneous wave-free ratio as a pressure-only estimation of underlying coronary flow reserve: results of the JUSTIFY-CFR Study (Joined Coronary Pressure and Flow Analysis to Determine Diagnostic Characteristics of Basal and Hyperemic Indices of Functional Lesion Severity-Coronary Flow Reserve). Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 492-502.
6. Sen S, Nijjer S, Petraco R, Malik IS, Francis DP, Davies J. Instantaneous wavefree ratio: numerically different, but diagnostically superior to FFR Is lower always better? J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 62: 566.
7. van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Escaned J, et al. Head-to-head comparison of basal stenosis resistance index, instantaneous wave-free ratio, and fractional flow reserve: diagnostic accuracy for stenosis-specific myocardial ischaemia. EuroIntervention 2015; 11: 914-25.
8. Sen S, Escaned J, Malik IS, et al. Development and validation of a new adenosine-independent index of stenosis severity from coronary wave-intensity analysis: results of the ADVISE (ADenosine Vasodilator Independent Stenosis Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 1392-402.
9. Petraco R, Escaned J, Sen S, et al. Classification performance of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) and fractional flow reserve in a clinical population of intermediate coronary stenoses: results of the ADVISE registry. EuroIntervention 2013; 9: 91-101.
10. Jeremias A, Maehara A, Généreux P, et al. Multicenter core laboratory comparison of the instantaneous wave-free ratio and resting Pd/Pa with fractional flow reserve: The RESOLVE study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 63: 1253-61.
11. Götberg M, Christiansen EH, Gudmundsdottir I, et al. Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio versus Fractional Flow Reserve guided intervention (iFR-SWEDEHEART): rationale and design of a multicenter, prospective, registry-based randomized clinical trial. Am Heart J 2015; 170: 945-50.
12. Fröbert O, Lagerqvist B, Olivecrona GK, et al. Thrombus aspiration during STsegment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2013; 369: 1587-97.
13. Christiansen EH, Jensen LO, Thayssen P, et al. Biolimus-eluting biodegradable polymer-coated stent versus durable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent in unselected patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (SORT OUT V): A randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 661-9.
14. Maeng M, Tilsted HH, Jensen LO, et al. Differential clinical outcomes after 1 year versus 5 years in a randomised comparison of zotarolimus-eluting and sirolimuseluting coronary stents (the SORT OUT III study): A multicentre, open-label, randomised superiority trial. Lancet 2014; 383: 2047-56.
15. Machin D, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for survival time analyses. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988; 296: 1369-71.
16. Davies JE, Sen S, Dehbi H-M, et al. Use of the instantaneous wave-free ratio or fractional flow reserve in PCI. N Engl J Med 2017; 376:1824-34.
17. Barbato E, Toth GG, Johnson NP, et al. A prospective natural history study of coronary atherosclerosis using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 68: 2247-55.
18. Pijls NHJ, De Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronaryartery stenoses. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 1703-8.
19. De Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Heyndrickx GR. Relation between myocardial fractional flow reserve calculated from coronary pressure measurements and exercise-induced myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1995; 92: 39-46.
20. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 177-84.
21. Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2541-619.
22. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58(24): e44-e122.
23. Dattilo PB, Prasad A, Honeycutt E, Wang TY, Messenger JC. Contemporary patterns of fractional flow reserve and intravascular ultrasound use among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: insights from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 2337-9.
24. Curzen N, Rana O, Nicholas Z, et al. Does routine pressure wire assessment influence management strategy at coronary angiography for diagnosis of chest pain? The RIPCORD study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 248-55.
25. Patel HR, Shah P, Bajaj S, Virk H, Bikkina M, Shamoon F. Intracoronary adenosine-induced ventricular arrhythmias during fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement: case series and literature review. Cardiovasc Interv Ther 2016 August 30 (Epub ahead of print).
26. Jang HJ, Koo BK, Lee HS, et al. Safety and efficacy of a novel hyperaemic agent, intracoronary nicorandil, for invasive physiological assessments in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 2055-62.
27. Stone GW, Sabik JF, Serruys PW, et al. Everolimus-eluting stents or bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 2223-35.
28. Mäkikallio T, Holm NR, Lindsay M, et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): A prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2016; 388: 2743-52.
29. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961-72.