Peer-to-peer communication across network address translators

USENIX 2005 Annual Technical Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 179-192

  Ford, Bryan ^a   Srisuresh, Pyda ^b   Kegel, Dan ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Caymas Systems   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEM FIREWALLS; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL; VOICE/DATA COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

HOLE PUNCHING; NETWORK ADDRESS TRANSLATIONS; NETWORK ADDRESS TRANSLATORS; ON-LINE GAMING; P2P APPLICATIONS; PAPER DOCUMENTS; PEER-TO-PEER COMMUNICATIONS; VOICE OVER IP;

PEER TO PEER NETWORKS;

EID: 85019224720     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Andrew Biggadike, Daniel Ferullo, Geoffrey Wilson, and Adrian Perrig. NATBLASTER: Establishing TCP connections between hosts behind NATs. In ACM SIGCOMM Asia Workshop, Beijing, China, April 2005.
2. David Clark, Robert Braden, Aaron Falk, and Venkata Pingali. FARA: Reorganizing the addressing architecture. In ACM SIGCOMM FDNA Workshop, August 2003.
3. S. Deering and R. Hinden. Internet protocol, version 6 (IPv6) specification, December 1998. RFC 2460.
4. Jeffrey L. Eppinger. TCP connections for P2P apps: A software approach to solving the NAT problem. Technical Report CMUISRI-05-104, Carnegie Mellon University, January 2005.
5. Bryan Ford. Scalable Internet routing on topology-independent node identities. Technical Report MIT-LCS-TR-926, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, October 2003.
6. Bryan Ford. Unmanaged internet protocol: Taming the edge network management crisis. In Second Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks, Cambridge, MA, November 2003.
7. Paul Francis and Ramakrishna Gummadi. IPNL: A NAT-extended Internet architecture. In ACM SIGCOMM, August 2002.
8. Saikat Guha and Paul Francis. Simple traversal of UDP through NATs and TCP too (STUNT). http://nutss.gforge.cis.cornell.edu/.
9. Saikat Guha, Yutaka Takeday, and Paul Francis. NUTSS: A SIP-based approach to UDP and TCP network connectivity. In SIGCOMM 2004 Workshops, August 2004.
10. M. Holdrege and P. Srisuresh. Protocol complications with the IP network address translator, January 2001. RFC 3027.
11. C. Huitema. Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs, March 2004. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress).
12. C. Jennings. NAT classification results using STUN, October 2004. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress).
13. Dan Kegel. NAT and peer-to-peer networking, July 1999. http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/∼dank/peer-nat.html.
14. M. Leech et al. SOCKS protocol, March 1996. RFC 1928.
15. R. Moskowitz and P. Nikander. Host identity protocol architecture, April 2003. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress).
16. NAT check. http://midcom-p2p.sourceforge.net/.
17. J. Rosenberg. Interactive connectivity establishment (ICE), October 2003. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress).
18. J. Rosenberg, C. Huitema, and R. Mahy. Traversal using relay NAT (TURN), October 2003. Internet-Draft (Work in Progress).
19. J. Rosenberg, J. Weinberger, C. Huitema, and R. Mahy. STUN - simple traversal of user datagram protocol (UDP) through network address translators (NATs), March 2003. RFC 3489.
20. J. Saltzer. On the naming and binding of network destinations. In P. Ravasio et al., editor, Local Computer Networks, pages 311–317. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982. RFC 1498.
21. P. Srisuresh and M. Holdrege. IP network address translator (NAT) terminology and considerations, August 1999. RFC 2663.
22. P. Srisuresh, J. Kuthan, J. Rosenberg, A. Molitor, and A. Rayhan. Middlebox communication architecture and framework, August 2002. RFC 3303.
23. Transmission control protocol, September 1981. RFC 793.
24. G. Tsirtsis and P. Srisuresh. Network address translation - protocol translation (NAT-PT), February 2000. RFC 2766.
25. Justin Uberti. E-mail on IETF MIDCOM mailing list, February 2004. Message-ID: <402CEB11.1060906@aol.com>.
26. UPnP Forum. Internet gateway device (IGD) standardized device control protocol, November 2001. http://www.upnp.org/.
27. Michael Walfish, Jeremy Stribling, Maxwell Krohn, Hari Balakrishnan, Robert Morris, and Scott Shenker. Middleboxes no longer considered harmful. In USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation, San Francisco, CA, December 2004.