메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 103, Issue , 2017, Pages 917-918

Truth or Consequences: The Growing Trend of Publication Retraction

Author keywords

Neurosurgery; Plagiarism; Publications; Research ethics; Retractions

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMED CENTRAL; CLINICAL MEDICINE; COMPETITION; CURRICULUM; FUNDING; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOFTWARE; UNITED KINGDOM; WEB OF SCIENCE;

EID: 85018903363     PISSN: 18788750     EISSN: 18788769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.086     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (4)

References (9)
  • 1
    • 84998827920 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central
    • Moylan, E.C., Kowalczuk, M.K., Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open, 6, 2016, e012047.
    • (2016) BMJ Open , vol.6 , pp. e012047
    • Moylan, E.C.1    Kowalczuk, M.K.2
  • 3
    • 85019927275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Retraction of neurosurgical publications: a systematic review
    • Wang, J., Ku, J., Alotaibi, N.M., Rutka, J.T., Retraction of neurosurgical publications: a systematic review. World Neurosurg, 2017, 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.014.
    • (2017) World Neurosurg
    • Wang, J.1    Ku, J.2    Alotaibi, N.M.3    Rutka, J.T.4
  • 4
    • 85002180387 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 21st century science overload. The CSP Blog
    • Available at: Accessed April 7
    • Boon, S., 21st century science overload. The CSP Blog. Available at: http://www.cdnsciencepub.com/blog/21st-century-science-overload.aspx Accessed April 7, 2017.
    • (2017)
    • Boon, S.1
  • 5
    • 80053927591 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The trouble with retractions
    • Van Noorden, R., The trouble with retractions. Nature 478 (2011), 26–28.
    • (2011) Nature , vol.478 , pp. 26-28
    • Van Noorden, R.1
  • 6
    • 66849084202 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data
    • Fanelli, D., How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4, 2009, e5738.
    • (2009) PLoS One , vol.4 , pp. e5738
    • Fanelli, D.1
  • 7
    • 85040029090 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Elsevier publishing—a look at the numbers, and more
    • Available at: Accessed April 7
    • Reller, T., Elsevier publishing—a look at the numbers, and more. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/connect/elsevier-publishing-a-look-at-the-numbers-and-more Accessed April 7, 2017.
    • (2017)
    • Reller, T.1
  • 8
    • 85021355842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • About COPE
    • Available at: Accessed April 7
    • Committee on Publication Ethics, About COPE. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/about Accessed April 7, 2017.
    • (2017)
    • Committee on Publication Ethics1
  • 9
    • 85033232909 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Retraction Guidelines
    • Available at: Accessed April 7
    • Committee on Publication Ethics, Retraction Guidelines. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction%20guidelines_0.pdf Accessed April 7, 2017.
    • (2017)
    • Committee on Publication Ethics1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.