Erratum: Development of a claims-based frailty indicator anchored to a well-established frailty phenotype (Medical Care (2017) 55 (716-722) DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000729);Development of a Claims-based Frailty Indicator Anchored to a Well-established Frailty Phenotype

Medical Care

Volumn 55, Issue 7, 2017, Pages 716-722

  Segal, Jodi B ^a,b   Chang, Hsien Yen ^b   Du, Yu ^b   Walston, Jeremy D ^a   Carlson, Michelle C ^b   Varadhan, Ravi ^a,b  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

administrative claims; frailty; measurement; Medicare

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIMS (HEALTH CARE); ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; AGING; CLINICAL OUTCOME; COMORBIDITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DEATH; DISABILITY; FEMALE; FRAILTY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICARE; NURSING HOME; PREDICTIVE VALIDITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; COHORT ANALYSIS; FACTUAL DATABASE; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; INSURANCE; PROCEDURES;

AGED; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COHORT STUDIES; DATABASES, FACTUAL; FRAIL ELDERLY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; INSURANCE CLAIM REVIEW;

EID: 85018815299     PISSN: 00257079     EISSN: 15371948     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000836     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, et al. Frailty in older adults: evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56:M146-M156.
2. Chang SF, Lin PL. Frail phenotype and mortality predication: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2005;52:1362-1374.
3. Frisoli A Jr, Ingham SJ, Paes ÂT, et al. Frailty predictors and outcomes among older patients with cardiovascular disease: data from Fragicor. Arch Gerontal Geriatr. 2015;61:1-7.
4. Macklai NS, Spagnoli J, Junod J, et al. Prospective association of the SHARE-operationalized frailty phenotype with adverse health outcomes: evidence from 60+ community-dwelling Europeans living in 11 countries. BMC Geriatr. 2013;13:3.
5. Kim DH, Schneeweiss S. Measuring frailty using claims data for pharmacoepidemiologic studies of mortality in older adults: evidence and recommendations. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23:891-901.
6. Fried LP, Borhani NO, Enright P, et al. The Cardiovascular Health Study: design and rationale. Ann Epidemiol. 1991;1:263-276.
7. Bandeen-Roche K, Xue Q-L, Ferrucci L, et al. Phenotype of frailty: characterization in the Women's health and Aging Studies. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2006;61:262-266.
8. Buta BJ, Walston JD, Godino JG, et al. Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Res Rev. 2016;26:53-56.
9. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. Clinical Classifications Software. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2015.
10. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Statistic Soc B. 1996;58:267-288.
11. Friedman JH. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat. 2001;29:1189-1232.
12. Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning. 2001;45:5-32.
13. Mitnitski AB, Mogilner AJ, Rockwood K. Accumulation of deficits as a proxy measure of aging. Sci World J. 2001;1:323-336.
14. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. J Stat Software. 2001;33:1-22.
15. De Long ER, De Long DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837-845.
16. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:613-619.
17. Romano PS, Roos LL, Jollis JG. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative data: differing perspectives. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1075-1079.
18. De Vries NM, Staal JB, Van Ravensberg CD, et al. Outcome instruments to measure frailty: a systematic review. Age Res Rev. 2011; 10:104-114.
19. Faurot KR, Jonsson Funk M, Pate V, et al. Using claims data to predict dependency in activities of daily living as a proxy for frailty. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24:59-66.
20. Fried LP, Ferrucci L, Darer J, et al. Untangling the concepts of disability, frailty, and comorbidity: implications for improved targeting and care. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59:M255-M263.
21. Kamaruzzaman S, Ploubidis GB, Fletcher A, et al. A reliable measure of frailty for a community dwelling older population. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010;8:123.
22. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;210: 901-908.
23. Pialoux T, Goyard J, Lesourd B. Screening tools for frailty in primary health care: a systematic review. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12: 189-197.
24. Pijpers E, Ferreira I, Stehouwer CDA, et al. The frailty dilemma. Review of the predictive accuracy of major frailty scores. Eur J Int Med. 2012;23:118-123.
25. Rockwood K, Andrew M, Mitnitski A. Unconventional views of frailty: a comparison of two approaches to measuring frailty in elderly people. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007;62:738-743.
26. Afilalo J. The road to frailty is paved with good intentions. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016;9:194-196.
27. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ. 2005;173:489-495.
28. Blodgett J, Theou O, Kirkland S, et al. Frailty in NHANES: comparing the frailty index and phenotype. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2015;60: 464-470.
29. Hoogendijk EO, Van Kan GA, Guyonnet S, et al. Components of the frailty phenotype in relation to the frailty index: results from the Toulouse frailty platform. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16:855-859.
30. Ophet-Veld LPM, Van Rossum E, Kempen G, et al. Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains. BMC Geriatr. 2015;15:77.
31. Bandeen-Roche K, Seplaki CL, Huang J, et al. Frailty in older adults: a nationally representative profile in the United States. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70:1427-1434.
32. Sensitive and restricted data files. National Health and Aging Trends Study. 2015. Available at: www.nhatsdata.org/ResDataFiles.aspx. Accessed February 15, 2016.
33. Atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Available at: www2.cscc. unc.edu/aric/. Accessed February 15, 2016.
34. Benson WF, Aldrich N. CDC's Disaster Planning Goal: Protect Vulnerable Older Adults (Media Contact). Washington, DC: CDC Healthy Aging Program; 2007.
35. Sakauye KM, Streim JE, Kennedy GJ, et al. AAGP position statement: disaster preparedness for older Americans: critical issues for the preservation of mental health. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17: 916-924.
36. Claver M, Dobalian A, Fickel JJ, et al. Comprehensive care for vulnerable elderly veterans during disasters. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2013;56:205-213.
37. Dobalian A, Claver M, Fickel JJ. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita and the Department of Veterans Affairs: a conceptual model for understanding the evacuation of nursing homes. Gerontology. 2010;56:581-588.
38. Chen X, Mao G, Leng SX. Frailty syndrome: an overview. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:433-441.