Use of demand for and spatial flow of ecosystem services to identify priority areas

Conservation Biology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 860-871

  Verhagen, Willem ^a   Kukkala, Aija S ^b   Moilanen, Atte ^b   van Teeffelen, Astrid J A ^a   Verburg, Peter H ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

ecosystem service flows; European Union; flujos de servicios ambientales; land targets; objetivos terrestres; planeaci n sistem tica de la conservaci n; priorizaci n espacial; software Zonation; spatial prioritization; systematic conservation planning; Uni n Europea; Zonation software

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONNECTIVITY; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DEMAND ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; EUROPEAN UNION; PRIORITIZATION; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRADE-OFF;

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION;

BIODIVERSITY; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM;

EID: 85018777560     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12872     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bubeck P, de Moel H, Bouwer LM, Aerts JCJH. 2011. How reliable are projections of future flood damage? Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 11: 3293–3306.
2. Casalegno S, Bennie JJ, Inger R, Gaston KJ. 2014. Regional scale prioritisation for key ecosystem services, renewable energy production and urban development. PLOS ONE 9 (e3107822) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0107822.
3. Chan KMA, Shaw MR, Cameron DR, Underwood EC, Daily GC. 2006. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLOS Biology 4 (e379) DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
4. Cimon-Morin J, Darveau M, Poulin M. 2013. Fostering synergies between ecosystem services and biodiversity in conservation planning: a review. Biological Conservation 166:144–154.
5. Cimon-Morin J, Darveau M, Poulin M. 2014. Towards systematic conservation planning adapted to the local flow of ecosystem services. Global Ecology and Conservation 2:1–13.
6. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 2010. Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011-2020 and the Aichi Targets. CBD Secretariate, Montreal.
7. Derkzen ML, van Teeffelen AJA, Verburg PH. 2015. Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high-resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 52:1020–1032.
8. Durán A, Duffy J, Gaston K. 2014. Exclusion of agricultural lands in spatial conservation prioritization strategies: consequences for biodiversity and ecosystem service representation. Proceedings of Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:20141529.
9. EEA (European Environment Agency). 2008. European river catchment (ERC) classified by ocean. EEA, Copenhagen. Available from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/european-river-catchments-1#tab-gis-data (accessed June 2015).
10. European Commission. 2013. Green infrastructure (GI) — enhancing Europe's natural capital. COM(2013)249 final. Commission of the European Communities, Brussels.
11. European Commission. 2011. Our life insurance, Our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. European Commission, Brussels.
12. Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68:643–653.
13. GISCO (Geographic Information System of the Commision). 2011. Urban audit. GISCO, Luxembourg. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/reference-data/administrative-units-statistical-units/urban-audit (accessed September 2015).
14. Kukkala AS, Arponen A, Maiorano L, Moilanen A, Thuiller W, Toivonen T, Zupan L, Brotons L, Cabeza M. 2016. Matches and mismatches between national and EU-wide priorities: examining the Natura 2000 network in vertebrate species conservation. Biological Conservation 198:193–201.
15. Lehtomäki J, Moilanen A. 2013. Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation. Environmental Modelling and Software 47:128–137.
16. Luck GW, Chan KM, Klien CJ. 2012. Identifying spatial priorities for protecting ecosystem services. F1000 Research DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.1-17.v1.
17. Maes J, Lavalle C, Vizcaino Martinez P. 2015. LF511- NO2 removal by urban vegetation (LUISA Platform REF2014). European Commission, Joint Research Centre. Available from http://data.europa.eu/89h/jrc-luisa-lf511-no2-removal-by-urban-vegetation-ref-2014 (accessed June 2014).
18. Maes J, Liquete C, Teller A, Erhard M. 2016. An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Ecosystem Services 17:14–23.
19. MEA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
20. Moilanen A, Arponen A. 2011. Administrative regions in conservation: Balancing local priorities with regional to global preferences in spatial planning. Biological Conservation 144:1719–1725.
21. Moilanen A, Franco AMA, Early RI, Fox R, Wintle B, Thomas CD. 2005. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences 272:1885–1891.
22. Moilanen A, Pouzols FM, Meller L, Veach V, Arponen A, Leppänen J, Kujala H. 2014. Spatial conservation planning methods and software Zonation. User manual. Version 4. Helsinki.
23. Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP. 2009. Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
24. Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M. 2006. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21:681–687.
25. Orsi F, Church RL, Geneletti D. 2011. Restoring forest landscapes for biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods: a spatial optimisation model. Environmental Modelling and Software 26:1622–1638.
26. Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Kopperoinen L, Maes J, Schägner JP, Termansen M, Zandersen M, Perez-Soba M, Scholefield PA, Bidoglio G. 2014. Mapping cultural ecosystem services: A framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecological Indicators 45:371–385.
27. Pistocchi A, Marinov D, Pontes S, Zulian G, Trombetti M. 2011. Multimedia assessment of pollutant pathways in the environment: a global scale model. Joint Research Centre, Luxembourg.
28. Possingham HP, Ball IR, Andelman SJ. 2000. Mathematical methods for identifying representative reserve networks. Pages 291–305 in Ferson S, Burgman MA, editors. Quantitative methods for conservation biology. Springer Verlag, New York.
29. Pouzols FM, Toivonen T, Di Minin E, Kukkala AS, Kullberg P, Kuusterä J, Lehtomäki J, Tenkanen H, Verburg PH, Moilanen A. 2014. Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism. Nature 516:383–386.
30. Remme RP, Schröter M. 2016. Effects of budget constraints on conservation network design for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 26:45–56.
31. Schröter M, Rusch GM, Barton DN, Blumentrath S, Nordén B. 2014. Ecosystem services and opportunity costs shift spatial priorities for conserving forest biodiversity. PLOS ONE 9 (e112557) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0112557.
32. Schulp CJE, Lautenbach S, Verburg PH. 2014. Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union. Ecological Indicators 36:131–141.
33. Schulp CJE, Nabuurs G-J, Verburg PH. 2008. Future carbon sequestration in Europe—Effects of land use change. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 127:251–264.
34. Stürck J, Poortinga A, Verburg PH. 2014. Mapping ecosystem services: the supply and demand of flood regulation services in Europe. Ecological Indicators 38:198–211.
35. Stürck J, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. 2015. Spatio-temporal dynamics of regulating ecosystem services in Europe – the role of past and future land use change. Applied Geography 63:121–135.
36. Van Berkel DB, Verburg PH. 2011. Sensitising rural policy: assessing spatial variation in rural development options for Europe. Land Use Policy 28:447–459.
37. Van der Zanden EH, Verburg PH, Mücher CA. 2013. Modelling the spatial distribution of linear landscape elements in Europe. Ecological Indicators 27:125–136.
38. Van Teeffelen AJA, Cabeza M, Moilanen A. 2006. Connectivity, probabilities and persistence: comparing reserve selection strategies. Biodiversity and Conservation 15:899–919.
39. Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. 2015. Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecological Indicators 55:159–171.