Sensitivity analysis of fracture scattering

Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 80th Annual Meeting 2010, SEG 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 2340-2345

  Fang, Xinding ^a   Fehler, Michael ^a   Chen, Tianrun ^a   Burns, D R ^a  

^a MIT Earth Resources Lab   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC WAVE EFFECTS; GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING; MATRIX ALGEBRA; PLATES (STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS); SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHEAR WAVES;

APPROXIMATE ANALYTICAL SOLUTIONS; CHARACTERISTIC LENGTH; DISPLACEMENT DISCONTINUITY; EFFECTIVE MEDIUM THEORIES; FINITE DIFFERENCE MODEL; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; MECHANICAL PARAMETERS; REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS;

FRACTURE;

EID: 85018623281     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3513320     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Coates, R. T., and M. Schoenberg, 1995, Finite-difference modeling of faults and fractures: Geophysics, 60, 1514–1526, doi:10.1190/1.1443884.
2. Grechka, V., and M. Kachanov, 2006, Effective elasticity of fractured rocks: A snapshot of the work in progress: Geophysics, 71, no. 6, W45–W58, doi:10.1190/1.2360212.
3. Grechka, V., 2007, Multiple cracks in VTI rocks: Effective properties and fracture characterization: Geophysics, 72, no. 5, D81–D91, doi:10.1190/1.2751500.
4. Gu, B., R. Suarez-Rivera, K. T. Nihei, and L. R. Myer, 1996, Incidence of plane waves upon a fracture: Journal of Geophysical Research, 101, no. B11, 25337–25346, doi:10.1029/96JB01755.
5. Gurevich, B., D. Makarynska, and M. Pervukhina, 2009. Are penny-shaped cracks a good model for compliant porosity, 79th Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 3431-3435.
6. Hudson, J. A., 1991, Overall properties of heterogeneous material: Geophysical Journal International, 107, no. 3, 505–511, doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1991.tb01411.x.
7. Lubbe, R., J. Sothcott, M. H. Worthington, and C. McCann, 2008, Laboratory estimates of normal and shear fracture compliance: Geophysical Prospecting, 56, no. 2, 239–247, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2007.00688.x.
8. Lubbe, R., and M. H. Worthington, 2006, A field investigation of fracture compliance: Geophysical Prospecting, 54, no. 3, 319–331, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00530.x.
9. Pyrak-Nolte, L. J., and N. G. W. Cook, 1987, Elastic interface waves along a fracture: Geophysical Research Letters, 14, no. 11, 1107–1110, doi:10.1029/GL014i011p01107.
10. Schoenberg, M., 1980, Elastic wave behavior across linear slip interfaces: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, no. 5, 1516–1521, doi:10.1121/1.385077.
11. Schoenberg, M., and C. M. Sayers, 1995, Seismic anisotropy of fractured rock: Geophysics, 60, 204–211, doi:10.1190/1.1443748.
12. Sanchez-Sesma, F. J., and U. Iturraran-Viveros, 2001, Scattering and diffraction of SH waves by a finite crack: an analytical solution: Geophysical Journal International, 145, no. 3, 749–758, doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.2001.01426.x.
13. Sayers, C. M., 2009, Seismic characterization of reservoirs containing multiple fracture sets: Geophysical Prospecting, 57, no. 2, 187–192, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00766.x.
14. Sayers, C. M., A. D. Taleghani, and J. Adachi, 2009, The effect of mineralization on the ratio of normal to tangential compliance of fractures: Geophysical Prospecting, 57, no. 3, 439–446, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00746.x.
15. Willis, M. E., D. Burns, R. Rao, B. Minsley, M. N. Toksoz, and L. Vetri, 2006, Spatial orientation and distribution of reservoir fractures from scattered seismic energy: Geophysics, 71, no. 5, O43–O51, doi:10.1190/1.2235977.
16. Worthington, M. H., and R. Lubbe, 2007, The scaling of fracture compliance: Geological Society, Special Publications, 270, 73-82.