-
1
-
-
85018538384
-
-
National Institutes of Health, Published. Accessed January 9, 2017.
-
National Institutes of Health. All of Us: The Precision Medicine Initiative. https://www.nih.gov /research-training/allofus-research-program. Published 2016. Accessed January 9, 2017.
-
(2016)
All of Us: The Precision Medicine Initiative
-
-
-
2
-
-
85018193823
-
Evaluation of evidence of statistical support and corroboration of subgroup claims in randomized clinical trials
-
[published online February 13]
-
Wallach JD, Sullivan PG, Trepanowski JF, Sainani KL, Steyerberg EW, Ioannidis JPA. Evaluation of evidence of statistical support and corroboration of subgroup claims in randomized clinical trials [published online February 13, 2017]. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9125
-
(2017)
JAMA Intern Med
-
-
Wallach, J.D.1
Sullivan, P.G.2
Trepanowski, J.F.3
Sainani, K.L.4
Steyerberg, E.W.5
Ioannidis, J.P.A.6
-
3
-
-
36348939350
-
Statistics in medicine: Reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials
-
Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware JH, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine: Reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(21):2189-2194.
-
(2007)
N Engl J Med
, vol.357
, Issue.21
, pp. 2189-2194
-
-
Wang, R.1
Lagakos, S.W.2
Ware, J.H.3
Hunter, D.J.4
Drazen, J.M.5
-
4
-
-
0035049158
-
Adjusting for multiple testing: When and how?
-
Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing: when and how?. J Clin Epidemiol. 2001;54 (4):343-349.
-
(2001)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.54
, Issue.4
, pp. 343-349
-
-
Bender, R.1
Lange, S.2
-
5
-
-
80053563163
-
Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data
-
Foster JC, Taylor JM, Ruberg SJ. Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Stat Med. 2011;30(24):2867-2880.
-
(2011)
Stat Med
, vol.30
, Issue.24
, pp. 2867-2880
-
-
Foster, J.C.1
Taylor, J.M.2
Ruberg, S.J.3
-
6
-
-
84926513964
-
A regression tree approach to identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects
-
LohWY, He X, Man M. A regression tree approach to identifying subgroups with differential treatment effects. Stat Med. 2015;34(11):1818-1833.
-
(2015)
Stat Med
, vol.34
, Issue.11
, pp. 1818-1833
-
-
Loh, W.Y.1
He, X.2
Man, M.3
-
7
-
-
31744435871
-
Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies [published correction appears in Nat Genet. 2006;38(3):390]
-
Skol AD, Scott LJ, Abecasis GR, BoehnkeM. Joint analysis is more efficient than replication-based analysis for two-stage genome-wide association studies [published correction appears in Nat Genet. 2006;38(3):390]. Nat Genet. 2006;38(2):209-213.
-
(2006)
Nat Genet
, vol.38
, Issue.2
, pp. 209-213
-
-
Skol, A.D.1
Scott, L.J.2
Abecasis, G.R.3
Boehnke, M.4
|