Tween 80 surfactant-enhanced bioremediation: toward a solution to the soil contamination by hydrophobic organic compounds

Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

Volumn 38, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 17-30

  Cheng, Min ^a   Zeng, Guangming ^a   Huang, Danlian ^a   Yang, Chunping ^a   Lai, Cui ^a   Zhang, Chen ^a   Liu, Yang ^a  

^a HUNAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

biodegradation; biological technologies; organic pollutants; phytoremediation; Soil remediation; surfactant

Indexed keywords

BIODEGRADATION; BIOREMEDIATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CONTAMINATION; HYDROPHOBICITY; NONIONIC SURFACTANTS; ORGANIC POLLUTANTS; SOIL CONSERVATION; SOILS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS;

BIOLOGICAL TECHNOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES; HYDROPHOBIC ORGANIC COMPOUND; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; PHYTOREMEDIATION; REMEDIATION TECHNOLOGIES; SOIL REMEDIATION; SURFACTANT-ENHANCED BIOREMEDIATION;

SOIL POLLUTION;

ORGANIC COMPOUND; POLYSORBATE 80; POLYSORBATE; SURFACTANT;

BIOAVAILABILITY; BIOREMEDIATION; CHEMICAL REACTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESORPTION; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; HYDROPHOBICITY; MICROBIAL DEGRADATION; NONHUMAN; PHYTOREMEDIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCALE UP; SOIL MICROFLORA; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL PROPERTY; SOLUBILIZATION; WATER SUPPLY; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLISM; SOIL POLLUTANT;

BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; POLYSORBATES; SOIL POLLUTANTS; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS;

EID: 85018497634     PISSN: 07388551     EISSN: 15497801     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2017.1311296     Document Type: Review

References (101)

1. Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NP. Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2003;13:57–149.
2. Paria S. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;138:24–58.
3. Cheng M, Zeng G, Huang D, et al. Degradation of atrazine by a novel Fenton-like process and assessment the influence on the treated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2016;312:184–191.
4. Gerhardt KE, Huang XD, Glick BR, et al. Phytoremediation and rhizoremediation of organic soil contaminants: potential and challenges. Plant Sci. 2009;176:20–30.
5. Schnoor JL, Light LA, McCutcheon SC, et al. Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environ Sci Technol. 1995;29:318A–323A.
6. Cheng M, Zeng G, Huang D, et al. Hydroxyl radicals based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for remediation of soils contaminated with organic compounds: a review. Chem Eng J. 2016;284:582–598.
7. Ni H, Zhou W, Zhu L. Enhancing plant-microbe associated bioremediation of phenanthrene and pyrene contaminated soil by SDBS-Tween 80 mixed surfactants. J Environ Sci (China). 2014;26:1071–1079.
8. Wang P, Keller AA. Particle-size dependent sorption and desorption of pesticides within a water − soil − nonionic surfactant system. Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:3381–3387.
9. Zhu L, Chen B, Tao S, et al. Interactions of organic contaminants with mineral-adsorbed surfactants. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:4001–4006.
10. Jafvert CT, Heath JK. Sediment-and saturated-soil-associated reactions involving an anionic surfactant (dodecylsulfate). 1. Precipitation and micelle formation. Environ Sci Technol. 1991;25:1031–1038.
11. Bautista LF, Sanz R, Molina MC, et al. Effect of different non-ionic surfactants on the biodegradation of PAHs by diverse aerobic bacteria. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2009;63:913–922.
12. Aken BV, Correa PA, Schnoor JL. Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls: new trends and promises. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;44:2767–2776.
13. Mao X, Jiang R, Xiao W, et al. Use of surfactants for the remediation of contaminated soils: a review. J Hazard Mater. 2015;285:419–435.
14. Trellu C, Mousset E, Pechaud Y, et al. Removal of hydrophobic organic pollutants from soil washing/flushing solutions: a critical review. J Hazard Mater. 2016;306:149–174.
15. Bradl H, Xenidis A. Chapter 3 Remediation techniques. In: Bradl HB, editor. Interface science and technology. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2005. p. 165–261.
16. Cameselle C, Belhadj B, Akretche DE, Gouveia S. Advances in electrokinetic remediation for the removal of organic contaminants in soils. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2013.
17. Deshpande S, Shiau B, Wade D, et al. Surfactant selection for enhancing ex situ soil washing. Water Res. 1999;33:351–360.
18. Vishnyakov A, Lee MT, Neimark AV. Prediction of the critical micelle concentration of nonionic surfactants by dissipative particle dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem Lett. 2013;4:797–802.
19. 14C-hexadecane mineralisation in weathered hydrocarbon contaminated soil. Sci Total Environ. 2012;414:585–591.
20. Liu ZF, Zeng GM, Wang J, et al. Effects of monorhamnolipid and Tween 80 on the degradation of phenol by Candida tropicalis. Process Biochem. 2010;45:805–809.
21. Mousset E, Oturan N, van Hullebusch ED, et al. Influence of solubilizing agents (cyclodextrin or surfactant) on phenanthrene degradation by electro-Fenton process–study of soil washing recycling possibilities and environmental impact. Water Res. 2014;48:306–316.
22. Wu M, Xu Y, Ding W, et al. Mycoremediation of manganese and phenanthrene by Pleurotus eryngii mycelium enhanced by Tween 80 and saponin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:7249–7261.
23. Garon D, Krivobok S, Wouessidjewe D, et al. Influence of surfactants on solubilization and fungal degradation of fluorene. Chemosphere. 2002;47:303–309.
24. Rodríguez-Escales P, Borràs E, Sarra M, et al. Granulometry and surfactants, key factors in desorption and biodegradation (T. Versicolor) of PAHs in soil and groundwater. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2013;224:1–12.
25. Mousset E, Oturan MA, Van Hullebusch ED, et al. Soil washing/flushing treatments of organic pollutants enhanced by cyclodextrins and integrated treatments: state of the art. Crit. Rev Env Sci Technol. 2014;44:705–795.
26. Kim HS, Weber WJ. Preferential surfactant utilization by a PAH-degrading strain: effects on micellar solubilization phenomena. Environ Sci Technol. 2003;37:3574–3580.
27. de la Cueva SC, Rodríguez CH, Cruz NOS, et al. Changes in bacterial populations during bioremediation of soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons. Water, Air, Soil Pollut. 2016;227:1–12.
28. Kumari B, Rajput S, Gaur P, et al. Biodegradation of pyrene and phenanthrene by bacterial consortium and evaluation of role of surfactant. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2014;60:22–28.
29. Yan ZG, Wan TL, Li ZZ, et al. Surfactant-enhanced phytoremediation of soils contaminated with hydrophobic organic contaminants: potential and assessment. Pedosphere. 2007;17:409–418.
30. Agnello A, Huguenot D, Van Hullebusch E, et al. Phytotoxicity of citric acid and Tween® 80 for potential use as soil amendments in enhanced phytoremediation. Int J Phytoremediation. 2015;17:669–677.
31. Zhu L, Zhang M. Effect of rhamnolipids on the uptake of PAHs by ryegrass. Environ Pollut. 2008;156:46–52.
32. Gennaro PD, Franzetti A, Bestetti G, et al. Slurry phase bioremediation of PAHs in industrial landfill samples at laboratory scale. Waste Manage. 2008;28:1338–1345.
33. Franzetti A, Di Gennaro P, Bevilacqua A, et al. Environmental features of two commercial surfactants widely used in soil remediation. Chemosphere. 2006;62:1474–1480.
34. Zhang C, Lai C, Zeng G, et al. Efficacy of carbonaceous nanocomposites for sorbing ionizable antibiotic sulfamethazine from aqueous solution. Water Res. 2016;95:103–112.
35. Volkering F, Breure A, Rulkens W. Microbiological aspects of surfactant use for biological soil remediation. Biodegradation. 1997;8:401–417.
36. Zheng Z, Obbard JP. Effect of non-ionic surfactants on elimination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil‐slurry by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 2001;76:423–429.
37. Zheng Z, Obbard JP. Removal of surfactant solubilized polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Phanerochaete chrysosporium in a rotating biological contactor reactor. J Biotechnol. 2002;96:241–249.
38. Chen M, Zeng G, Tan Z, et al. Understanding lignin-degrading reactions of ligninolytic enzymes: binding affinity and interactional profile. PLoS One. 2011;6:e25647.
39. 2+ on the production of hydroxyl radical during solid-state fermentation of straw with Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Biochem Eng J. 2014;84:9–15.
40. Gao D, Du L, Yang J, et al. A critical review of the application of white rot fungus to environmental pollution control. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010;30:70–77.
41. Huang D, Zeng G, Feng C, et al. Degradation of lead-contaminated lignocellulosic waste by Phanerochaete chrysosporium and the reduction of lead toxicity, Environ Sci Technol. 2008;42:4946–4951.
42. Zeng G, Cheng M, Huang D, et al. Study of the degradation of methylene blue by semi-solid-state fermentation of agricultural residues with Phanerochaete chrysosporium and reutilization of fermented residues. Waste Manage. 2015;38:424–430.
43. Tortella G, Durán N, Rubilar O, et al. Are white-rot fungi a real biotechnological option for the improvement of environmental health?. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2015;3:165–172.
44. Leonardi V, Šašek V, Petruccioli M, et al. Bioavailability modification and fungal biodegradation of PAHs in aged industrial soils. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2007;6:165–170.
45. Hadibarata T, Tachibana S. Characterization of phenanthrene degradation by strain Polyporus sp. S133. JEnvS. 2010;2:142–149.
46. 2 by Pestalotiopsis sp. in liquid medium and soil. Chemosphere. 2014;10:105–113.
47. Wang C, Liu H, Li J, et al. Degradation of PAHs in soil by Lasiodiplodia theobromae and enhanced benzo[a]pyrene degradation by the addition of Tween-80. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;2:10614–10625.
48. Pozdnyakova NN. Involvement of the ligninolytic system of white-rot and litter-decomposing fungi in the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Biotechnol Res Int. 2012;2012:1–20.
49. Hadibarata T, Kristanti RA. Fluorene biodegradation and identification of transformation products by white-rot fungus Armillaria sp. F022. Biodegradation. 2014;2:373–382.
50. Zhang D, Zhu L. Effects of Tween 80 on the removal, sorption and biodegradation of pyrene by Klebsiella oxytoca PYR-1. Environ Pollut. 2012;16:169–174.
51. Yadav M, Shukla AK, Srivastva N, et al. Utilization of microbial community potential for removal of chlorpyrifos: a review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2016;3:727–742.
52. Ghosh I, Mukherji S. Diverse effect of surfactants on pyrene biodegradation by a pseudomonas strain utilizing pyrene by cell surface hydrophobicity induction. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2016;10:67–75.
53. Zhao J, Chi Y, Liu F, et al. Effects of two surfactants and beta-cyclodextrin on beta-cypermethrin degradation by Bacillus licheniformis B-1. J Agric Food Chem. 2015;6:10729–10735.
54. Zhang D, Zhu L, Li F. Influences and mechanisms of surfactants on pyrene biodegradation based on interactions of surfactant with a Klebsiella oxytoca strain. Bioresour Technol. 2013;14:454–461.
55. Piskonen R, Itävaara M. Evaluation of chemical pretreatment of contaminated soil for improved PAH bioremediation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;6:627–634.
56. Guha S, Jaffé PR. Biodegradation kinetics of phenanthrene partitioned into the micellar phase of nonionic surfactants. Environ Sci Technol. 1996;3:605–611.
57. Mukherji S, Ghosh I. Bacterial degradation of high molecular weight polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons. Microbial degradation of xenobiotics. Springer; 2012. p. 189–211.
58. Doong RA, Lei WG. Solubilization and mineralization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by Pseudomonas putida in the presence of surfactant. J Hazard Mater. 2003;9:15–27.
59. Betancur-Corredor B, Pino NJ, Cardona S, et al. Evaluation of biostimulation and Tween 80 addition for the bioremediation of long-term DDT-contaminated soil. JEnvS. 2015;2:101–109.
60. Binh ND, Imsapsangworn C, Kim Oanh NT, et al. Sequential anaerobic–aerobic biodegradation of 2, 3, 7, 8-TCDD contaminated soil in the presence of CMC-coated nZVI and surfactant. Environ Technol. 2016;37:388–398.
61. Xiao HP, Xin HZ, Shi MW, et al. Effects of a biosurfactant and a synthetic surfactant on phenanthrene degradation by a Sphingomonas strain. Pedosphere. 2010;20:771–779.
62. Guha S, Jaffé PR. Bioavailability of hydrophobic compounds partitioned into the micellar phase of nonionic surfactants. Environ Sci Technol. 1996;30:1382–1391.
63. Jin D, Jiang X, Jing X, et al. Effects of concentration, head group, and structure of surfactants on the degradation of phenanthrene. J Hazard Mater. 2007;144:215–221.
64. Mousset E, Huguenot D, van Hullebusch ED, et al. Impact of electrochemical treatment of soil washing solution on PAH degradation efficiency and soil respirometry. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:354–362.
65. Ahn CK, Kim YM, Woo SH, et al. Soil washing using various nonionic surfactants and their recovery by selective adsorption with activated carbon. J Hazard Mater. 2008;154:153–160.
66. Alcántara MT, Gómez J, Pazos M, et al. PAHs soil decontamination in two steps: desorption and electrochemical treatment. J Hazard Mater. 2009;166:462–468.
67. Hernández-Soriano MC, Mingorance MD, Peña A. Desorption of two organophosphorous pesticides from soil with wastewater and surfactant solutions. J Environ Manage. 2012;95:S223–S227.
68. Rosas JM, Vicente F, Santos A, et al. Enhancing p-cresol extraction from soil. Chemosphere. 2011;84:260–264.
69. Deng F, Xiong B, Chen B, et al. Microbial degradation of endosulfan in contaminated soil with the elution of surfactants. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2016;23:13268–13275.
70. Trellu C, Ganzenko O, Papirio S, et al. Combination of anodic oxidation and biological treatment for the removal of phenanthrene and Tween 80 from soil washing solution. Chem Eng J. 2016;306:588–596.
71. Yan G, Ma W, Chen C, et al. Combinations of Surfactant Flushing and Bioremediation for Removing Fuel Hydrocarbons from Contaminated Soils. CLEAN Soil Air Water. 2016; 44:984–991.
72. Gong X, Xu X, Gong Z, et al. Remediation of PAH-contaminated soil at a gas manufacturing plant by a combined two-phase partition system washing and microbial degradation process. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:12001–12010.
73. Lai CC, Huang YC, Wei YH, et al. Biosurfactant-enhanced removal of total petroleum hydrocarbons from contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater. 2009;167:609–614.
74. Tsai TT, Kao CM, Yeh TY, et al. Remediation of fuel oil-contaminated soils by a three-stage treatment system. Environ Eng Sci. 2009;26:651–659.
75. Cheng K, Wong J. Effect of synthetic surfactants on the solubilization and distribution of PAHs in water/soil-water systems. Environ Technol. 2006;27:835–844.
76. Gharibzadeh F, Kalantary RR, Nasseri S, et al. Reuse of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soil washing effluent by bioaugmentation/biostimulation process. Sep Purif Technol. 2016;168:248–256.
77. Megharaj M, Ramakrishnan B, Venkateswarlu K, et al. Bioremediation approaches for organic pollutants: a critical perspective. Environ Int. 2011;37:1362–1375.
78. Suresh B, Ravishankar GA. Phytoremediation-a novel and promising approach for environmental clean-up. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2004;24:97–124.
79. Bacci E, Gaggi C. Polychlorinated biphenyls in plant foliage: translocation or volatilization from contaminated soils? Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 1985;35:673–681.
80. Abhilash P, Jamil S, Singh N. Transgenic plants for enhanced biodegradation and phytoremediation of organic xenobiotics. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:474–488.
81. Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB. A review on phytoremediation of crude oil spills. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015;226:1–18.
82. Cherian S, Oliveira MM. Transgenic plants in phytoremediation: recent advances and new possibilities. Environ Sci Technol. 2005;39:9377–9390.
83. Van Aken B. Transgenic plants for phytoremediation: helping nature to clean up environmental pollution. Trends Biotechnol. 2008;26:225–227.
84. Dietz AC, Schnoor JL. Advances in phytoremediation. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109:163.
85. Khan S, Afzal M, Iqbal S, et al. Plant-bacteria partnerships for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soils. Chemosphere. 2013;90:1317–1332.
86. Cheng K, Lai K, Wong J. Effects of pig manure compost and nonionic-surfactant Tween 80 on phenanthrene and pyrene removal from soil vegetated with Agropyron elongatum. Chemosphere. 2008;73:791–797.
87. Burken JG, Schnoor JL. Predictive relationships for uptake of organic contaminants by hybrid poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32:3379–3385.
88. Romeh A. Evaluation of the phytoremediation potential of three plant species for azoxystrobin-contaminated soil. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2015;12:3509–3518.
89. Romeh AA. Enhancing agents for phytoremediation of soil contaminated by cyanophos. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015;117:124–131.
90. Sun Y, Xu Y, Zhou Q, et al. The potential of gibberellic acid 3 (GA 3) and Tween-80 induced phytoremediation of co-contamination of Cd and Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) using Tagetes patula. J Environ Manage. 2013;114:202–208.
91. Mitton FM, Gonzalez M, Peña A, et al. Effects of amendments on soil availability and phytoremediation potential of aged p, p′-DDT, p, p′-DDE and p, p′-DDD residues by willow plants (Salix sp.). J Hazard Mater. 2012;203:62–68.
92. Cheng KY, Wong JW. Fate of 14C-Pyrene in soil-plant system amended with pig manure compost and Tween 80: a growth chamber study. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:8406–8412.
93. Cheng K, Wong J. Combined effect of nonionic surfactant Tween 80 and DOM on the behaviors of PAHs in soil-water system. Chemosphere. 2006;62:1907–1916.
94. Arthur EL, Rice PJ, Rice PJ, et al. Phytoremediation—an overview. Crit Rev Plant Sci. 2005;24:109–122.
95. Yang C, Zhou Q, Wei S, et al. Chemical-assisted phytoremediation of CD-PAHs contaminated soils using Solanum nigrum L. Int J Phytoremediation. 2011;13:818–833.
96. Ramamurthy AS, Memarian R. Phytoremediation of mixed soil contaminants. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012;223:511–518.
97. Memarian R, Ramamurthy AS. Effects of surfactants on rhizodegradation of oil in a contaminated soil. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2012;47:1486–1490.
98. ® 80-assisted phytoremediation of a co-contaminated soil: alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) performance and remediation potential. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:1–12.
99. Chigbo C, Batty L. Phytoremediation potential of Brassica juncea in Cu-pyrene co-contaminated soil: comparing freshly spiked soil with aged soil. J Environ Manage. 2013;129:18–24.
100. Hechmi N, Aissa NB, Abdennaceur H, et al. Phytoremediation potential of maize (Zea mays L.) in co-contaminated soils with pentachlorophenol and cadmium. Int J Phytoremediation. 2013;15:703–713.
101. Najeeb U, Jilani G, Ali S, et al. Insights into cadmium induced physiological and ultra-structural disorders in Juncus effusus L. and its remediation through exogenous citric acid. J Hazard Mater. 2011;186:565–574.