Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients treated with negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture: the long-term follow-up study

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 31, Issue 11, 2017, Pages 4717-4724

  Hofmann, Anna Theresa ^a   Gruber Blum, Simone ^a   Lechner, Michael ^b   Petter Puchner, Alexander ^a   Glaser, Karl ^a   Fortelny, René ^a,c  

^a WILHELMINEN HOSPITAL   (Austria)

^b PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c SIGMUND FREUD UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Delayed closure; Dynamic fascial suture; Negative pressure wound therapy; Open abdomen; Secondary peritonitis

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ABDOMINAL SURGERY; ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISIONAL HERNIA; MALE; MORTALITY RATE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERITONITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REOPERATION; SEPSIS; SPLIT THICKNESS SKIN GRAFT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VACUUM ASSISTED CLOSURE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT; ADVERSE DEVICE EFFECT; CLINICAL TRIAL; FASCIA; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL MESH; SUTURE; VERY ELDERLY;

ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FASCIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEGATIVE-PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY; PERITONITIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL MESH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; SUTURES;

EID: 85018474377     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5547-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dietz UA, Wichelmann C, Wunder C et al (2012) Early repair of open abdomen with a tailored two-component mesh and conditioning vacuum packing: a safe alternative to the planned giant ventral hernia. Hernia 16:451–460. doi:10.1007/s10029-012-0919-0
2. Keramati M, Srivastava A, Sakabu S et al (2008) The Wittmann Patch s a temporary abdominal closure device after decompressive celiotomy for abdominal compartment syndrome following burn. Burns 34:493–497. doi:10.1016/j.burns.2007.06.024
3. Koniaris LG, Hendrickson RJ, Drugas G et al (2001) Dynamic retention: a technique for closure of the complex abdomen in critically ill patients. Arch Surg 136:1359–1362 (discussion 1363)
4. Kafka-Ritsch R, Zitt M, Schorn N et al (2012) Open abdomen treatment with dynamic sutures and topical negative pressure resulting in a high primary fascia closure rate. World J Surg 36:1765–1771. doi:10.1007/s00268-012-1586-0
5. Petersson U, Acosta S, Björck M (2007) Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction—a novel technique for late closure of the open abdomen. World J Surg 31:2133–2137. doi:10.1007/s00268-007-9222-0
6. Björck M, Bruhin A, Cheatham M et al (2009) Classification—important step to improve management of patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:1154–1157. doi:10.1007/s00268-009-9996-3
7. Boele van Hensbroek P, Wind J, Dijkgraaf MGW et al (2009) Temporary closure of the open abdomen: a systematic review on delayed primary fascial closure in patients with an open abdomen. World J Surg 33:199–207. doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9867-3
8. Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC, Chang MC (2004) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen. Ann Surg 239:608–616. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000124291.09032.bf
9. Latifi R, Joseph B, Kulvatunyou N et al (2012) Enterocutaneous fistulas and a hostile abdomen: reoperative surgical approaches. World J Surg 36:516–523. doi:10.1007/s00268-011-1306-1
10. Bjarnason T, Montgomery A, Ekberg O et al (2013) One-year follow-up after open abdomen therapy with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. World J Surg 37:2031–2038. doi:10.1007/s00268-013-2082-x
11. Kreis BE, de Mol van Otterloo AJ, Kreis RW (2013) Open abdomen management: a review of its history and a proposed management algorithm. Med Sci Monit 19:524–533. doi:10.12659/MSM.883966
12. Fortelny RH, Hofmann A, Gruber-Blum S et al (2014) Delayed closure of open abdomen in septic patients is facilitated by combined negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial suture. Surg Endosc 28:735–740. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3251-6
13. Petersson U, Bjarnason T, Björck M et al (2016) Quality of life and hernia development 5 years after open abdomen treatment with vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction. Hernia. doi:10.1007/s10029-016-1516-4
14. Brandl A, Laimer E, Perathoner A et al (2014) Incisional hernia rate after open abdomen treatment with negative pressure and delayed primary fascia closure. Hernia 18:105–111. doi:10.1007/s10029-013-1064-0
15. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K et al (2010) Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 251:843–856. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4
16. Israelsson LA, Millbourn D (2012) Closing midline abdominal incisions. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg/Dtsch Gesellschaft für Chir 397:1201–1207. doi:10.1007/s00423-012-1019-4
17. Bosanquet DC, Ansell J, Abdelrahman T et al (2015) Systematic review and meta-regression of factors affecting midline incisional hernia rates: analysis of 14,618 patients. PLoS ONE 10:e0138745. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0138745
18. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2011) Risk factors for wound complications in midline abdominal incisions related to the size of stitches. Hernia 15:261–266. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0775-8
19. Millbourn D, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2009) Effect of stitch length on wound complications after closure of midline incisions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Surg 144:1056–1059. doi:10.1001/archsurg.2009.189