On error-class distribution in automotive model-based software

2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering, SANER 2016

Volumn 1, Issue , 2016, Pages 688-692

  Altinger, Harald ^a   Dajsuren, Yanja ^b   Siegl, Sebastian ^c   Vinju, Jurgen J ^b   Wotawa, Franz ^d  

^a AUDI ELECTRONICS VENTURE GMBH   (Germany)

^b CWI   (Netherlands)

^c AUDI AG   (Germany)

^d GRAZ UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; ERRORS; FORECASTING; PROGRAM DEBUGGING; REENGINEERING; STATISTICAL TESTS;

AUTOMOTIVE MODELS; AUTOMOTIVE SOFTWARE; CLASS DISTRIBUTIONS; INDUSTRIAL SOFTWARE; POTENTIAL ERRORS; SOFTWARE FAULT PREDICTION; SOFTWARE METRICS; SUPPORTING TESTS;

SOFTWARE TESTING;

EID: 85018445310     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SANER.2016.81     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. H. Altinger, S. Herbold, J. Grabowski, and F. Wotawa. Novel insights on cross project fault prediction applied to automotive software. In Testing Software and Systems, volume 9447 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Sharjah and Dubai, United Arab Emirates, Nov. 2015. Springer.
2. H. Altinger, S. Siegl, Y. Dajsuren, and F. Wotawa. A novel industry grade dataset for fault prediction based on model-driven developed automotive embedded software. In Proceedings of the 12th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories, Florence, Italy, May 2015. IEEE.
3. H. Altinger, F. Wotawa, and M. Schurius. Testing methods used in the automotive industry: Results from a survey. In Proc.\ JAMAICA, page 16, San Jose, CA, July 2014. ACM.
4. R. M. Bell, T. J. Ostrand, and E. J. Weyuker. Looking for bugs in all the right places. In Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Software testing and analysis, page 6172, 2006.
5. C. Boogerd and L. Moonen. Assessing the value of coding standards: An empirical study. In Software Maintenance, 2008. ICSM 2008. IEEE International Conference on, page 277286, 2008.
6. C. Boogerd and L. Moonen. Evaluating the relation between coding standard violations and faultswithin and across software versions. In Mining Software Repositories, 2009. MSR'09. 6th IEEE International Working Conference on, page 4150, 2009.
7. M. Broy. Challenges in automotive software engineering. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Software engineering, ICSE'06, page 3342, New York, NY, USA, 2006. ACM. ACM.
8. G. Canfora, A. Cimitile, and P. B. Lucarelli. Software maintenance. Handbook of Software Eng. and Knowledge Eng, page 91120, 2002.
9. Y. Dajsuren, M. G. van den Brand, A. Serebrenik, and S. Roubtsov. Simulink models are also software: Modularity assessment. In Proceedings of the 9th international ACM Sigsoft conference on Quality of software architectures, page 99106. ACM, 2013.
10. dSpace. TargetLink. https://www.dspace.com/de/gmb/home/products/sw/pcgs/targetli.cfm, 2015.
11. N. E. Fenton and M. Neil. A critique of software defect prediction models. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 25(5):675689, 1999.
12. L. Hatton. Language subsetting in an industrial context: A comparison of MISRA c 1998 and MISRA c 2004. Information and Software Technology, 49(5):475482, 2007.
13. ISO. ISO/IEC 14764:2006 Software Engineering Software Life Cycle Processes Maintenance. 2011.
14. D. Kozlov, J. Koskinen, and M. Sakkinen. Fault-proneness of open source software: Exploring its relations to internal software quality and maintenance process. Open Software Engineering Journal, 7:123, 2013.
15. Z. Li, L. Tan, X. Wang, S. Lu, Y. Zhou, and C. Zhai. Have things changed now?: an empirical study of bug characteristics in modern open source software. In Proceedings of the 1st workshop on Architectural and system support for improving software dependability, page 2533, 2006.
16. Mathworks. Mathworks automotive advisory board checks (MAAB). http://www.mathworks.com/help/slvnv/ref/mathworks-automotive-advisory-board-checks.html, 2014.
17. Mathworks. Polyspace. http://de.mathworks.com/products/polyspace/, 2015.
18. Mathworks. Simulink. http://www.mathworks.com/products/simulink, 2015.
19. Mathworks. Stateflow. http://de.mathworks.com/products/stateflow, 2015.
20. Motor Industry Software Reliability Association. MISRA-C:2004 - Guidelines for the use of the C language in critical systems. MISRA, Warwickshire, 2 edition, 2004.
21. M. Olszewska, M. Huova, M. Waldén, K. Sere, and M. Linjama. Quality analysis of simulink models. In 12th International Conference on Quality Engineering in Software Technology, CONQUEST2009. dpunkt. verlag, Nuremberg, 2009.
22. T. J. Ostrand, E. J. Weyuker, and R. M. Bell. Predicting the location and number of faults in large software systems. Software Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 31(4):340355, 2005.
23. N. Palix, J. Lawall, and G. Muller. Tracking code patterns over multiple software versions with herodotos. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Aspect-Oriented Software Development, page 169180, 2010.
24. J. Peleska, F. Lapschies, H. Lding, P. Smuda, H. Schmid, E. Vorobev, and C. Zahlten. Turn indicator model overview. http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/agbs/testingbenchmarks/turn_indicator/, Apr. 2014.
25. F. Shull, V. Basili, B. Boehm, P. Costa, M. Lindvall, D. Port, I. Rus, R. Tesoriero, M. Zelkowitz, et al. What we have learned about fighting defects. In Software Metrics, 2002. Proceedings. Eighth IEEE Symposium on, page 249258, 2002.
26. V. Vipindeep and P. Jalote. List of common bugs and programming practices to avoid them. Electronic, March, 2005.