A Comparison of Locomotor Therapy Interventions: Partial-Body Weight−Supported Treadmill, Lokomat, and G-EO Training in People With Traumatic Brain Injury

PM and R

Volumn 9, Issue 9, 2017, Pages 839-846

  Esquenazi, Alberto ^a   Lee, Stella ^b   Wikoff, Amanda ^b   Packel, Andrew ^b   Toczylowski, Theresa ^b   Feeley, John ^b  

^a Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory   (United States)

^b MossRehab Gait and Motion Analysis Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHRONIC TRAUMATIC ENCEPHALOPATHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; END EFFECTOR ROBOT TRAINING; FALLING; FEMALE; GAIT ORTHOSIS; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MALE; NEUROREHABILITATION; PAIN; PARTIAL BODY WEIGHT SUPPORTED TREADMILL TRAINING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CENTER; ROBOTICS; SIX MINUTE WALK TEST; SKIN IRRITATION; STANDING; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TIME; TREADMILL; TREADMILL EXERCISE; WALKING DIFFICULTY; WALKING SPEED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMPLICATION; DEVICES; EXERCISE TEST; FOLLOW UP; KINESIOTHERAPY; NEUROLOGIC GAIT DISORDER; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STROKE REHABILITATION; TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT BEARING;

BRAIN INJURIES, TRAUMATIC; EXERCISE TEST; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT DISORDERS, NEUROLOGIC; HUMANS; MALE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 85018347586     PISSN: 19341482     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.12.010     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Faul, M., Xu, L., Wald, M., Coronado, V., Traumatic brain injury in the United States: Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths. 2010, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Atlanta, GA.
2. Walker, W., Pickett, T., Motor impairment after severe traumatic brain injury: A longitudinal multicenter study. J Rehabil Res Dev 44 (2007), 975–982.
3. Katz, D., Alexander, M., Klein, R., Recovery of arm function in patients with paresis after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 79 (1998), 488–493.
4. Black, K., Zafonte, R., Millis, S., et al. Sitting balance following brain injury: Does it predict outcome?. Brain Inj 14 (2000), 141–152.
5. Hillier, S., Sharpe, M., Metzer, J., Outcomes 5 years post-traumatic brain injury (with further reference to neurophysical impairment and disability). Brain Inj 11 (1997), 661–675.
6. Brown, A., Malec, J., Diehl, N., Englander, J., Cifu, D., Impairment at rehabilitation admission and 1 year after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective multi-centre analysis. Brain Inj 21 (2007), 673–680.
7. Johnk, K., Kuhtz-Buschbeck, J., Stolze, H., et al. Assessment of sensorimotor functions after traumatic brain injury (TBI) in childhood—Methodological aspects. Restor Neurol Neurosci 14 (1999), 143–152.
8. Ochi, F., Esquenazi, A., Hirai, B., Talaty, M., Temporal-spatial feature of gait after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 14 (1999), 105–115.
9. Schmidt, R., Lee, T., (eds.) Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis, 1998, Human Kinetics Publishers, Inc, Champaign, IL.
10. Peters, D.M., Jain, S., Liuzzo, D.M., et al. Individuals with chronic traumatic brain injury improve walking speed and mobility with intensive mobility training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95 (2014), 1454–1460.
11. Esquenazi, A., Lee, S., Packel, A.T., Braitman, L., A randomized comparative study of manually assisted versus robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training in persons with a traumatic brain injury. PM R 54 (2013), 280–290.
12. Westlake, K., Patten, C., Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 6, 2009, 18.
13. Wilson, D.J., Swaboda, J., Partial weight-bearing gait retraining for persons following traumatic brain injury: Preliminary report and proposed assessment scale. Brain Inj 16 (2002), 259–268.
14. Behrman, A., Bowden, M., Nair, P., Neuroplasticity after spinal cord injury and training: An emerging paradigm shift in rehabilitation and walking recovery. Phys Ther 86 (2006), 1406–1425.
15. Behrman, A., Harkema, S., Locomotor training after human spinal cord injury: A series of case studies. Phys Ther 80 (2000), 688–700.
16. Williams, G., Clark, R., Schache, A., et al. Training conditions influence walking kinematics and self-selected walking speed in patients with neurological impairments. J Neurotrauma 28 (2011), 281–287.
17. Esquenazi, A., Lee, S., Packel, A., Braitman, L., A randomized comparative study of manually assisted versus robotic-assisted body weight supported treadmill training in persons with a traumatic brain injury. PM R 54 (2013), 280–290.
18. Taylor A. An instrumental gait mat. Proceedings of the International Conference of Rehabilitation and Engineering; Toronto, Canada; 1980.
19. Mehrholz, J., Pohl, M., Elsner, B., Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, 2014, CD002840.
20. Esquenazi, A., Maier, I., Beer, S., et al. (eds.) Clinical Application of Robotics and Technology in the Restoration of Walking, 2016, Springer, London.
21. Rosenthal, R., Parametric measures of effect size. Cooper, H., Hedges, L.V., Valentine, J.C., (eds.) The Handbook of Research Synthesis, 1994, Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 231–244.
22. Cohen, J., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed., 1988, Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
23. National Database: 2016 Profile of People within the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems. April 2016 ed, 2016, The Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database, Englewood, CO.
24. Basford, J., Chou, L., Kaufman, K., et al. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84 (2003), 343–349.
25. Sacco, K., Cauda, F., D'Agata, F., et al. A combined robotic and cognitive training for locomotor rehabilitation: Evidences of cerebral functional reorganization in two chronic traumatic brain injured patients. Front Hum Neurosci, 5, 2011, 146.
26. Esquenazi, A., Hirai, B., Gait analysis in stroke and head injury. Craik, R., Oatis, C., (eds.) Gait Analysis, Theory and Application, 1995, Mosby, St. Louis, MO, 412–419.
27. Perry, J., Garrett, M., Gronley, J., Mulroy, S., Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26 (1995), 982–989.
28. Balasubramanian, C., Bowden, M., Neptune, R., Kautz, S., Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88 (2007), 43–49.
29. Jankowski, L., Sullivan, S., Aerobic and neuromuscular training: effect on the capacity, efficiency, and fatigability of patients with traumatic brain injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 71 (1990), 500–504.