Comparison of fracture properties of cellulose nanopaper, printing paper and buckypaper

Journal of Materials Science

Volumn 52, Issue 16, 2017, Pages 9508-9519

  Mao, Rui ^a   Goutianos, Stergios ^b   Tu, Wei ^a   Meng, Nan ^a   Yang, Guang ^c   Berglund, Lars A ^d   Peijs, Ton ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^d ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRITTLENESS; CARBON; FIBERS; FRACTURE; FRACTURE MECHANICS; HYDROGEN BONDS; NANOFIBERS; PRINTING; TENSILE TESTING; VAN DER WAALS FORCES; YARN;

CELLULOSE NANOFIBRES; COHESIVE ZONE MODEL; DOUBLE EDGE NOTCH TENSILE; ENERGY COMPONENTS; FIBROUS NETWORKS; FRACTURE BEHAVIOUR; FRACTURE PROPERTY; INTER-FIBRE BONDING;

CELLULOSE;

CELLULOSE DERIVATIVES; FIBER LENGTH; FRACTURE; HYDROGEN BONDS; PRINTING PAPERS;

EID: 85018282634     PISSN: 00222461     EISSN: 15734803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-017-1108-4     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Gea S, Reynolds CT, Roohpur N, Soykeabkaew N, Wirjosentono B, Bilotti E, Peijs T (2010) Biodegradable composites based on poly(epsilon-caprolactone) and bacterial cellulose as a reinforcing agent. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 4:384–390
2. Gea S, Bilotti E, Reynolds C, Soykeabkeaw N, Peijs T (2010) Bacterial cellulose–poly(vinyl alcohol) nanocomposites prepared by an in situ process. Mater Lett 64:901–904
3. Gea S, Torres F, Troncoso O, Reynolds C, Vilasecca F, Iguchi M, Peijs T (2007) Biocomposites based on bacterial cellulose and apple and radish pulp. Int Polym Proc 22:497–501
4. Arévalo R, Peijs T (2016) Binderless all-cellulose fibreboard from microfibrillated lignocellulosic natural fibres. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 83:38–46
5. Sehaqui H, Liu AD, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromol 11:2195–2198
6. Henriksson M, Berglund LA, Isaksson P, Lindstrom T, Nishino T (2008) Cellulose nanopaper structures of high toughness. Biomacromol 9:1579–1585
7. Eichhorn SJ, Dufresne A, Aranguren M, Marcovich NE, Capadona JR, Rowan SJ, Weder C, Thielemans W, Roman M, Renneckar S, Gindl W, Veigel S, Keckes J, Yano H, Abe K, Nogi M, Nakagaito AN, Mangalam A, Simonsen J, Benight AS, Bismarck A, Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Review: current international research into cellulose nanofibres and nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 45:1–33
8. Shi Z, Zang S, Jiang F, Huang L, Lu D, Ma Y, Yang G (2012) In situ nano-assembly of bacterial cellulose–polyaniline composites. RSC Adv 2:1040–1046
9. Klemm D, Heublein B, Fink HP, Bohn A (2005) Cellulose: fascinating biopolymer and sustainable raw material. Angew Chem Int Edit 44:3358–3393
10. Watanabe K, Tabuchi M, Morinaga Y, Yoshinaga F (1998) Structural features and properties of bacterial cellulose produced in agitated culture. Cellulose 5:187–200
11. Berglund LA, Peijs T (2010) Cellulose biocomposites-from bulk moldings to nanostructured systems. MRS Bull 35:201–207
12. Nogi M, Iwamoto S, Nakagaito AN, Yano H (2009) Optically transparent nanofiber paper. Adv Mater 21:1595–1598
13. Huang J, Zhu HL, Chen YC, Preston C, Rohrbach K, Cumings J, Hu LB (2013) Highly transparent and flexible nanopaper transistors. ACS Nano 7:2106–2113
14. Syverud K, Stenius P (2009) Strength and barrier properties of MFC films. Cellulose 16:75–85
15. Stachewicz U, Peker I, Tu W, Barber AH (2011) Stress delocalization in crack tolerant electrospun nanofiber networks. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:1991–1996
16. Hagman A, Nygårds M (2012) Investigation of sample-size effects on in-plane tensile testing of paperboard. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 27:295–304
17. Li J (2015) Investigation of the fracture resistance of paper utilizing a modified linear elastic fracture mechanics model. Master Dissertation, Miami University
18. Ostlund S, Niskanen K, Karenlampi P (1999) On the prediction of the strength of paper structures with a flaw. J Pulp Pap Sci 25:356–360
19. Seth RS, Page DH (1974) Fracture resistance of paper. J Mater Sci 9:1745–1753
20. Makela P (2002) On the fracture mechanics of paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 17:254–274
21. Yuhara T, Kortschot MT (1993) A simplified determination of the J-Integral for paper. J Mater Sci 28:3571–3580
22. Westerlind BS, Carlsson LA, Andersson YM (1991) Fracture toughness of liner board evaluated by the J-integral. J Mater Sci 26:2630–2636
23. Seth RS (1995) Measurement of in-plane fracture toughness of paper. Tappi J 78:177–183
24. Tanaka A, Yamauchi T (2000) Deformation and fracture of paper during the in-plane fracture toughness testing—examination of the essential work of fracture method. J Mater Sci 35:1827–1833
25. Wanigaratne DMS, Batchelor WJ, Parker IH (2002) Comparison of fracture toughness of paper with tensile properties. Appita J 55:369–385
26. Goutianos S, Sørensen BF (2016) The application of J integral to measure cohesive laws under large-scale yielding. Eng Fract Mech 155:145–165
27. Sorensen BF, Goutianos S, Jacobsen TK (2009) Strength scaling of adhesive joints in polymer-matrix composites. Int J Solids Struct 46:741–761
28. Li S, Thouless MD, Waas AM, Schroeder JA, Zavattieri PD (2005) Use of a cohesive-zone model to analyze the fracture of a fiber-reinforced polymer-matrix composite. Compos Sci Technol 65:537–549
29. Mohammed I, Liechti KM (2000) Cohesive zone modeling of crack nucleation at bimaterial corners. J Mech Phys Solids 48:735–764
30. Yang QD, Thouless MD (2001) Mixed-mode fracture analyses of plastically-deforming adhesive joints. Int J Fract 110:175–187
31. Zechner J, Janko M, Kolednik O (2013) Determining the fracture resistance of thin sheet fiber composites—paper as a model material. Compos Sci Technol 74:43–51
32. Goutianos S, Arevalo R, Sorensen BF, Peijs T (2014) Effect of processing conditions on fracture resistance and cohesive laws of binderfree all-cellulose composites. Appl Compos Mater 21:805–825
33. Ansari F, Skrifvars M, Berglund LA (2015) Nanostructured biocomposites based on unsaturated polyester resin and a cellulose nanofiber network. Compos Sci Technol 117:298–306
34. Hervy M, Santmarti A, Lahtinenc P, Tammelin T, Lee KY (2017) Sample geometry dependency on the measured tensile properties of cellulose nanopapers. Mater Des 121:421–429
35. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindstrom T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43:3434–3441
36. Zendehbad SM, Yang G (2016) Analysis of bacterial cellulose/ionic liquid MWCNTs via cyclic voltammetry. Adv Chem Eng Sci 6:34–42
37. Zendehbad SM (2015) Controllable fabrication of BC based on time growth. Int J Mater Sci Appl 4:299–302
38. Skrzetuska E, Puchalski M, Krucińska I (2014) Chemically driven printed textile sensors based on graphene and carbon nanotubes. Sensors 14:16816–16828
39. Nanocyl (2016) Technical Data Sheet: NC7000™. http://www.nanocyl.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/DM-TI-02-TDS-NC7000-V08.pdf. Accessed 27 Mar 2017
40. Morel S, Lespine C, Coureau JL, Planas J, Dourado N (2010) Bilinear softening parameters and equivalent LEFM R-curve in quasibrittle failure. Int J Solids Struct 47:837–850
41. Abaqus (2011) Analysis user’s manual. Simulia, Providence, RI
42. Mollon V, Bonhomme J, Elmarakbi AM, Arguelles A, Vina J (2012) Finite element modelling of mode I delamination specimens by means of implicit and explicit solvers. Polym Test 31:404–410