The effects of a mobile phone application on quality of life in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled trial

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1086-1091

  Drion, Iefke ^a   Pameijer, Loes R ^a   Van Dijk, Peter R ^a   Groenier, Klaas H ^a,b   Kleefstra, Nanne ^a,b,c   Bilo, Henk J G ^a,b  

^a ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c Medical Research Group Langerhans   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Glycemic control; Mobile phone application; Quality of life; Randomized controlled trial; Type 1 diabetes mellitus; Usability

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN A1C; ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTIONAL STRESS; FEMALE; GLYCEMIC CONTROL; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; PROBLEM AREAS IN DIABETES QUESTIONNAIRE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RAND 36 QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMARTPHONE; SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE QUESTIONNAIRE; ADOLESCENT; BLOOD; CHILD; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATION; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85018220973     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296815585871     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Nathan DM, Cleary PA, Backlund JY, et al. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2005; 22; 353(25):2643-2653.
2. UK prospective Diabetes Study Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS-33). Lancet. 1998; 352: 837-853.
3. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329:977-986.
4. Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000; 321:405-412.
5. Karter AJ, Ackerson LM, Darbinian JA, et al. Self-monitoring of blood glucose levels and glycemic control: the Northern California Kaiser Permanente Diabetes registry. Am J Med. 2001; 111:1-9.
6. Kleefstra N, Landman GW, Houweling ST, et al. Prediction of mortality in type 2 diabetes from health-related quality of life (ZODIAC-4). Diabetes Care. 2008; 31:932-933.
7. McEwen LN, Kim C, Haan MN, et al. Are health-related quality-of-life and self-rated health associated with mortality? Insights from Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD). Prim Care Diabetes. 2009; 3:37-42.
8. Tsai SY, Chi LY, Lee CH, et al. Health related quality of life as a predictor of mortality among community-dwelling older persons. Eur J Epidemiol. 2007; 22:19-26.
9. Liang X, Wang Q, Yang X, et al. Effect of mobile phone intervention for diabetes on glycaemic control: a meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2011; 8:455-463.
10. Dbees.com. Diabetes Under Control. Available at: http://dbees.com/. Accessed February 12, 2014.
11. CONSORT Group. CONSORT statement. Overview Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-statement/. Accessed February 12, 2014.
12. Ware JE Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000; 25(24): 30-31.
13. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995; 18:754.
14. Brooke J. Usability Evaluation in Industry. London, UK: Taylor and Francis; 1996.
15. Snoek FJ, Pouwer F, Welch GW, et al. Diabetes-related emotional distress in Dutch and U.S. diabetic patients: cross-cultural validity of the problem areas in diabetes scale. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23:1305-1309.
16. Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R, Heyink JW, et al. Psychometric qualities of the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0: a multidimensional measure of general health status. Int J Behav Med. 1996; 3:104-122.
17. Welch G, Weinger K, Anderson B, et al. Responsiveness of the Problem Areas In Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Diabet Med. 2003; 20:69-72.
18. Bangor A, Kortum PT, Miller JT. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. Int J Hum Computer Interact. 2008; 24:574-594.
19. Lewis JR, Sauro J. The factor structure of the System Usability Scale. Paper presented at: HCII International Conference; 2009; San Diego, CA.
20. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25:3186-3191.
21. Rossi MC, Nicolucci A, Pellegrini F, et al. Interactive diary for diabetes: A useful and easy-to-use new telemedicine system to support the decision-making process in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009; 11:19-24.
22. Pal K, Eastwood SV, Michie S, et al. Computer-based diabetes self-management interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 3:CD008776.